Yehonatan Adler1,2, Sharon Tzelnick1,2, Yoni Shopen1,2, Ella Reifen1,2, Gideon Bachar1,2, Thomas Shpitzer1,2, Aviram Mizrachi3,4. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. 2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. aviramguy@hotmail.com. 4. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. aviramguy@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Role of intra-operative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring during parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has long been debated. Our main goal was to investigate the cure rates of parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism with and without IOPTH monitoring. Our secondary goal was to investigate if operating room time can be saved when IOPTH monitoring is not used. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT due to a single adenoma between 2004 and 2019 was performed. Cure rates and operating room time were compared. RESULTS: 423 patients were included. IOPTH was used in 248 patients (59%). Four patients were not cured, two from each group, with no significant difference between the groups (98.8% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.725). Surgery time was significantly longer in the IOPTH group, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage for using IOPTH during parathyroidectomy in suitable clinical settings. The procedure may be safely performed without IOPTH while achieving non-inferior success rates and reducing operative time.
PURPOSE: Role of intra-operative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring during parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has long been debated. Our main goal was to investigate the cure rates of parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism with and without IOPTH monitoring. Our secondary goal was to investigate if operating room time can be saved when IOPTH monitoring is not used. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT due to a single adenoma between 2004 and 2019 was performed. Cure rates and operating room time were compared. RESULTS: 423 patients were included. IOPTH was used in 248 patients (59%). Four patients were not cured, two from each group, with no significant difference between the groups (98.8% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.725). Surgery time was significantly longer in the IOPTH group, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: There is no advantage for using IOPTH during parathyroidectomy in suitable clinical settings. The procedure may be safely performed without IOPTH while achieving non-inferior success rates and reducing operative time.
Authors: Michael W Yeh; Philip H G Ituarte; Hui Cynthia Zhou; Stacie Nishimoto; In-Lu Amy Liu; Avital Harari; Philip I Haigh; Annette L Adams Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Philipp Riss; Christian Scheuba; Reza Asari; Christian Bieglmayer; Bruno Niederle Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: John P Bilezikian; Maria Luisa Brandi; Richard Eastell; Shonni J Silverberg; Robert Udelsman; Claudio Marcocci; John T Potts Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 5.958