Literature DB >> 35765515

Engaging Scientists in Policy Discourse.

Priyanka N Bushana1,2, Christopher Szlenk3, Shannon Kozlovich3,4.   

Abstract

Today's science is largely funded by taxpayer dollars, and because of this, scientists have a responsibility to ensure that their research is being effectively communicated back to taxpayers and to the policy makers who determine the distribution of those funds. The importance and impact of effective science communication is compounded when research is used to inform legislative action. Science impacts policy, and policy can impact science. However, the formal education of scientists does not usually include specific training on interacting with science policy. This article describes strategies for engaging with science policy-starting with simple and easy policy actions, and delving into more complex event planning and group organizing tasks. Whether advocating for evidence-based policies or policies that impact the scientific enterprise or STEM education, practicing skills pertinent to science policy can help you gain comfort in translating your experiences and experiments into lasting change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advocacy; policy; science advocacy; science communication; science policy

Year:  2019        PMID: 35765515      PMCID: PMC9236277          DOI: 10.1002/cpet.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protoc Essent Lab Tech        ISSN: 1948-3430


  13 in total

1.  From Pipettes to Science Policy.

Authors:  Yvette R Seger
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 16.687

2.  Shifts to and from daylight saving time and incidence of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Imre Janszky; Rickard Ljung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?

Authors:  Till Roenneberg; Anna Wirz-Justice; Debra J Skene; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Kenneth P Wright; Derk-Jan Dijk; Phyllis Zee; Michael R Gorman; Eva C Winnebeck; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.182

4.  Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity.

Authors:  Dustin J Welbourne; Will J Grant
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2015-02-19

5.  Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication.

Authors:  Jing Jiang; Bohan Dai; Danling Peng; Chaozhe Zhu; Li Liu; Chunming Lu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Trump seeks big cuts to science funding - again.

Authors:  Heidi Ledford; Sara Reardon; Emiliano Rodríguez Mega; Jeff Tollefson; Alexandra Witze
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Scientists Must Shape Our Future as They Have Shaped Our Past: Perspective of the Former US EPA Administrator.

Authors:  Gina McCarthy
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Temperature-dependent hypoxia explains biogeography and severity of end-Permian marine mass extinction.

Authors:  Justin L Penn; Curtis Deutsch; Jonathan L Payne; Erik A Sperling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Scientific risk communication about controversial issues influences public perceptions of scientists' political orientations and credibility.

Authors:  Emily Vraga; Teresa Myers; John Kotcher; Lindsey Beall; Ed Maibach
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?

Authors:  Paul Cairney; Kathryn Oliver
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.