Literature DB >> 35765297

A case of prenatal diagnosis of 16q24.3 microdeletion KBG syndrome and review of the literature.

Tianqin Deng1,2, Qingzhi Liu2, Jiansheng Xie2, Xuemei Li2, Bing Yao1.   

Abstract

Here we report a case of a 16q24.3 microdeletion KBG syndrome (KBGS) in a fetus. The absence of a well-defined phenotype poses a challenge for genetic diagnosis. This report demonstrated that the high-risk chromosome 21 trisomy could be the first manifestation of KBGS, as observed in this case.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANKRD11; KBG syndrome; chromosome microarray analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35765297      PMCID: PMC9207229          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


INTRODUCTION

KBG syndrome (KBGS) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by extensive growth retardation, craniofacial anomalies, oversized maxillary central incisors, and skeletal anomalies, as well as genetic alterations such as ANKRD11 gene mutation and 16q24.3 microdeletion, and prenatal diagnosis of KBGS has rarely been reported in China. In this study, we prenatally diagnosed KBGS in a fetus and analyzed its possible mechanism to provide a basis for clinical diagnosis, genetic counselling, and prenatal diagnosis.

METHODS

Subject

A pregnant woman, 31 years old, in her second pregnancy and first delivery received early Down's syndrome serological screening at 12 weeks of gestation. The results suggested that the chance of trisomy 21 was 1:89, which is high risk. Prenatal assessment was performed to further clarify the risk. After informed consent was obtained from the pregnant woman, amniocentesis was employed for amniotic fluid karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis. Termination of pregnancy was chosen after genetic counseling and multidisciplinary consultation, but an autopsy was refused. The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee, and the pregnant woman and her relatives signed an informed consent form.

Amniotic fluid karyotype analysis

Fetal amniotic fluid (30 ml) was extracted via ultrasound‐guided transabdominal amniotic cavity puncture at mid‐pregnancy, of which 10 ml was sent for gene chip analysis, and 20 ml was placed in 2 sterile centrifuge tubes in a 37°C and 5% CO2 incubator for cell culture. Cells were harvested by trypsin digestion and imaged and subjected to G‐banding analysis, in which more than 20 mid‐phase divisions were counted, and karyotype analysis.

CMA assay

Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit from Qiagen, Germany. The CMA assay strictly followed the standard operating procedure of the Affymetrix Cytoscan 750 K chip. Genomic DNA was digested into short fragments with enzymes, ligated with connectors and then amplified by PCR. After that, purification was performed by the magnetic bead method. The purified product was fragmented into 25–125 bp fragments and labeled with biotin. The products were denatured by mixing with hybridization solution, hybridized, washed, stained, and scanned by GeneChip Scanner 3000Dx v.2 with Autoloader, and the data were analyzed by ChAS3.0 and related bioinformatics software.

RESULTS

Amniotic fluid karyotype analysis revealed the following karyotype: 46,XN. Chromosome microarray analysis revealed the following results: arr[GRCh37] 16q24.3(89261399_89421499)x1, chromosome 16q24.3 deletion (approximately 160 kb; containing a total of 6 genes, 2 of which are OMIM genes: CDH15, SLC22A31, ZNF778, ANKRD11, LOC105371414, and LOC100287036) (Figures 1 and 2). The 16q24.3 deletion region was located within the KBGS‐related region and contained a partial deletion of the key KBGS gene ANKRD11 (exons 4–14).
FIGURE 1

Chromosome microarray analysis results of all chromosomes

FIGURE 2

Local magnification of chromosome aberration. Blue or red frames indicate a missing signal at the end of the long arm of chromosome 16

Chromosome microarray analysis results of all chromosomes Local magnification of chromosome aberration. Blue or red frames indicate a missing signal at the end of the long arm of chromosome 16 Peripheral blood high‐throughput sequencing: High‐throughput sequencing of the pregnant woman's peripheral blood revealed the following results: seq[GRCh37](1‐22)x2,(X)x2. High‐throughput sequencing of the patient's husband's peripheral blood revealed the following results: seq[GRCh37](1‐22)x2,(XY)x1.

DISCUSSION

KBGS (OMIM 148050) was first reported in 1975. The ANKRD11 gene on the long arm of chromosome 16 is the causative gene of KBGS, which features ANKRD11 mutation and the 16q24.3 microdeletion. Low et al. summarized the clinical and genetic features of 32 cases of KBGS in fetuses, and reported that the fetuses had few identifiable imaging features during the pregnancy. Most of the 20‐week anomaly scans were normal apart from single instances of a single umbilical artery, atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD), placenta previa, and decreased fetal movement. All babies reached a gestation age of at least 36 weeks, and the vast majority were delivered at term. In 2017, Victoria Hodgetts Morton et al. reported a case of KBGS in a fetus with a 16q24.3 microdeletion that was prenatally diagnosed due to enhanced intestinal echogenicity, but the autopsy revealed a more severe phenotype: triangular face pattern, hypoplastic ears, cryptorchidism, and pulmonary dysplasia. Novara et al. compared the phenotypes of KBGS with ANKRD11 mutation and KBGS with 16q24.3 microdeletion and found that KGBS with 16q24.3 microdeletion had a more severe phenotype. Goldenberg et al. reported two cases of KBGS with 16q24.3 microdeletion involving ANKRD11 and nearby gene deletions that included clinical manifestations of multiple malformations and learning disabilities. In 2012, Japanese scholars reported a clinically confirmed case of KBGS in a patient with a 690‐kb deletion on chromosome 16q24.3 (a de novo mutation involving part of ANKRD11) with typical facial appearance, massive maxillary central incisors, hand deformity, delayed bone age, and mental retardation, without autistic symptoms Our reported case also had a de novo mutation with partial deletion of ANKRD11, similar to that reported by the Japanese scholars, and no abnormality was seen on ultrasound at 22 weeks of gestation in our patient, posing a challenge for genetic counseling. The multidisciplinary consultation and literature education informed the patient that the clinical phenotypes of cases with deletions are generally more severe than those of cases with duplications ; the larger the deletion or duplicated fragment is, the more severe the manifestation (though the 160 kb fragment detected in the fetus was a relatively small microdeletion, the region contains the key KBGS pathogenic gene ANKRD11 (deletion of exons 4–10), and partial deletion of exons of this gene presumably leads to severe defects in the function of the encoded protein) ; de novo mutations are generally highly pathogenic; and postnatal clinical manifestations such as delayed language development, mental retardation, learning disabilities, dwarfism, epilepsy, and autism may occur in the fetus, and dwarfism is a common symptom of KBGS for which there is no specific treatment.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of KBGS with microdeletion type 16q24.3 was made in this case due to the high risk identified by early Down's syndrome screening and the finding of chromosome 16q24.3 deletion by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Diagnosis of KBGS due to a high risk identified by early Down's syndrome screening has not been reported in previous studies, and the prominent KBGS phenotype and absence of specificity on early ultrasound examination also pose a challenge for genetic diagnosis.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Qingzhi Liu, Jiansheng Xie, and Xuemei Li actively participated in collection and diagnosis of the patient. Tianqin Deng wrote the manuscript. Bing Yao revised the manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

This research was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Affiliated Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University (No.LLYJ2021‐077‐044), and patients signed informed consent forms to participate.

CONSENT

None. Appendix S1 Click here for additional data file. Figure S1 Click here for additional data file. Figure S2 Click here for additional data file.
  7 in total

1.  Clinical and molecular findings in 39 patients with KBG syndrome caused by deletion or mutation of ANKRD11.

Authors:  Alice Goldenberg; Florence Riccardi; Aude Tessier; Rolph Pfundt; Tiffany Busa; Pierre Cacciagli; Yline Capri; Charles Coutton; Andree Delahaye-Duriez; Thierry Frebourg; Vincent Gatinois; Anne-Marie Guerrot; David Genevieve; Francois Lecoquierre; Aurélia Jacquette; Philippe Khau Van Kien; Bruno Leheup; Sandrine Marlin; Alain Verloes; Vincent Michaud; Gwenael Nadeau; Cyril Mignot; Philippe Parent; Massimiliano Rossi; Annick Toutain; Elise Schaefer; Christel Thauvin-Robinet; Lionel Van Maldergem; Julien Thevenon; Véronique Satre; Laurence Perrin; Catherine Vincent-Delorme; Arthur Sorlin; Chantal Missirian; Laurent Villard; Julien Mancini; Pascale Saugier-Veber; Nicole Philip
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  KBG syndrome: Common and uncommon clinical features based on 31 new patients.

Authors:  Maria Gnazzo; Francesca R Lepri; Maria Lisa Dentici; Rossella Capolino; Elisa Pisaneschi; Emanuele Agolini; Martina Rinelli; Viola Alesi; Paolo Versacci; Silvia Genovese; Claudia Cesario; Lorenzo Sinibaldi; Anwar Baban; Andrea Bartuli; Bruno Marino; Marco Cappa; Bruno Dallapiccola; Antonio Novelli; Maria Cristina Digilio
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  The KBG syndrome-a syndrome of short stature, characteristic facies, mental retardation, macrodontia and skeletal anomalies.

Authors:  J Herrmann; P D Pallister; W Tiddy; J M Opitz
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1975

4.  A de novo deletion at 16q24.3 involving ANKRD11 in a Japanese patient with KBG syndrome.

Authors:  Satoko Miyatake; Akira Murakami; Nobuhiko Okamoto; Michiko Sakamoto; Noriko Miyake; Hirotomo Saitsu; Naomichi Matsumoto
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Haploinsufficiency for ANKRD11-flanking genes makes the difference between KBG and 16q24.3 microdeletion syndromes: 12 new cases.

Authors:  Francesca Novara; Berardo Rinaldi; Sanjay M Sisodiya; Antonietta Coppola; Sabrina Giglio; Franco Stanzial; Francesco Benedicenti; Alan Donaldson; Joris Andrieux; Rachel Stapleton; Astrid Weber; Paolo Reho; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Wilhelmina S Kerstjens-Frederikse; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Koenraad Devriendt; Carlos A Bacino; Andrée Delahaye; S M Maas; Achille Iolascon; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  The first antenatal diagnosis of KBG syndrome: a microdeletion at chromosome 16q24.2q24.3 containing multiple genes including ANKRD11 associated with the disorder.

Authors:  Victoria Hodgetts Morton; Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones; Natasha Butts; Denise Williams; Sue Hamilton; Tamas Marton; Katie Morris
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-11

7.  Clinical and genetic aspects of KBG syndrome.

Authors:  Karen Low; Tazeen Ashraf; Natalie Canham; Jill Clayton-Smith; Charu Deshpande; Alan Donaldson; Richard Fisher; Frances Flinter; Nicola Foulds; Alan Fryer; Kate Gibson; Ian Hayes; Alison Hills; Susan Holder; Melita Irving; Shelagh Joss; Emma Kivuva; Kathryn Lachlan; Alex Magee; Vivienne McConnell; Meriel McEntagart; Kay Metcalfe; Tara Montgomery; Ruth Newbury-Ecob; Fiona Stewart; Peter Turnpenny; Julie Vogt; David Fitzpatrick; Maggie Williams; Sarah Smithson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.802

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.