| Literature DB >> 35765223 |
Yangkui Zhai1, Wenjuan Yu2, Wen Shen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acupoint injection is a therapeutic method that combines acupuncture and Western medicine and shows good curative effects for neuropathies. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of acupoint injection for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by magnetic resonance neuroimaging (MRN). MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty patients with DPN were randomly divided into an acupoint injection group (AI; n=20) and intramuscular injection group (MI; n=20). The AI group received an acupoint injection of mecobalamin at acupoint Zusanli (S36); the MI group received intramuscular injection of mecobalamin. The curative effect was evaluated by the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). RESULTS The neuropathy scores of both groups decreased from baseline (AI 9.31±2.36; MI 9.34±2.54) to after the 2-week treatment (AI 7.12±1.87; MI 7.86±2.11); the differences were not significant. The fractional anisotropy (FA) value showed significant differences on the common peroneal nerve (AI 0.36±0.04; MI 0.31±0.05; P<0.05) and tibial nerve (AI 0.38±0.07; MI 0.34±0.06; P<0.05) after treatment. Likewise, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between groups showed significant differences for the common peroneal nerve (AI 1.44±0.17×10⁻³ mm²/s; MI 1.61±0.20×10⁻³ mm²/s; P<0.05) and tibial nerve (AI 1.54±0.22×10-3 mm²/s; MI 1.60±0.17 10⁻³ mm²/s; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with DPN showed lower nerve FA and higher ADC in DTI-MRN. The acupoint injection of mecobalamin could treat DPN and repair the damaged nerves, which was shown by elevated FA and lowered ADC. Our study provides clinical evidence for the application of acupoint injection therapy and the evaluation of DPN by MRN.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35765223 PMCID: PMC9252098 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.935979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1Flow chart of the trial. There were 40 patients enrolled and no dropouts throughout the study. Figure was created by XMind version 2020.
Demographic and baseline characteristics.
| Group | Acupoint injection | Intramuscular injection | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.22±5.24 | 51.58±5.66 | 0.13 |
| Male, n (%) | 49% | 38% | 0.14 |
| BMI index (kg/m2) | 23.17±3.19 | 24.41±2.69 | 1.01 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 7.81±2.11 | 8.24±2.14 | 0.63 |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.12±2.22 | 8.54±2.41 | 0.52 |
| Case of DR | 8 (20) | 10 (20) | 0.46 |
| UACR (mg/g) | 16.1±2.15 | 14.4±2.88 | 0.21 |
BMI – body max index; FBG – fasting blood glucose; HbA1c – glycated hemoglobin; DR – diabetic retinopathy; UACR – urine albumin-creatine ratio.
Toronto Clinical Scoring System scores of both groups.
| Group | Acupoint injection | Intramuscular injection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 14th day | Baseline | 14th day | |
| TCSS score | 9.31±2.36 | 7.12±1.87 | 9.34±2.54 | 7.86±2.11 |
Comparison before and after treatment within groups, P<0.05.
Figure 2Axial view of diffusion tensor imaging (B, C) and T2 weighted image (A) from a patient in the AI group at baseline. The regions of interest of the tibial (red) and common peroneal (green) nerves at the level of the right knee were displayed. Color fractional anisotropy maps (B) and apparent diffusion coefficient maps (C) of the tibial nerve and common peroneal nerve at the popliteal fossa level are shown. The figure was created by the software Syngo.via (VB40 Siemens Healthineers, Germany).
Fractional anisotropy values of both groups.
| Group | Acupoint injection | Intramuscular injection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 14th day | Baseline | 14th day | |
| Common peroneal nerve | 0.22±0.05 | 0.36±0.04 | 0.22±0.04 | 0.31±0.05 |
| Tibial nerve | 0.25±0.06 | 0.38±0.07 | 0.26±0.08 | 0.34±0.06 |
Comparison between groups, P<0.05;
comparison before and after treatment within groups, P<0.05.
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of both groups.
| Group | Acupoint injection | Intramuscular injection | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 14th day | Baseline | 14th day | |
| Common peroneal nerve | 1.64±0.21 | 1.44±0.17 | 1.69±0.19 | 1.61±0.20 |
| Tibial nerve | 1.82±0.18 | 1.54±0.22 | 1.81±0.18 | 1.60±0.17 |
ADC value (10−3 mm2/s).
Comparison between groups, P<0.05;
comparison before and after treatment within groups, P<0.05.