| Literature DB >> 35765062 |
Yutthana Khanasuk1, Srihatach Ngarmukos2, Aree Tanavalee3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The benefit of the femoral canal bone plug during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in reducing blood loss has never been proven. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether the femoral canal bone plug significantly reduces blood loss in primary TKA.Entities:
Keywords: Blood loss; Plug; Seal; TKA; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35765062 PMCID: PMC9238037 DOI: 10.1186/s43019-022-00160-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Relat Res ISSN: 2234-0726
Studies Included for the analysis
| Study | Total no. of patients | No. of female patients | Total knee arthroplasty | Outcomes | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With femoral canal bone plug ( | Without femoral canal bone plug ( | |||||
| Ko et al. 2003 [ | 262 | 198 | 128 | 134 | - Hemoglobin reduction - Total drained blood - Drained blood at 24 h postoperatively - Transfusion rate | Bone plug effectively reduced blood loss |
| Kumar et al. 2000 [ | 120 | 74 | 65 | 55 | - Total drained blood - Drained blood at 24 h postoperatively | Bone plug was effective in reducing blood loss |
| Torres-Claramunt et al. 2014 [ | 134a | 96 | 67 | 67 | - Hemoglobin reduction - Total drained blood - Drained blood at 24 h postoperatively - Transfusion rate | Bone plug had no effect on blood loss or transfusion rate |
| Li et al. 2017 [ | 120 | 91 | 60 | 60 | - Hemoglobin reduction, - Total drained blood, - Transfusion rate | Bone plug significantly reduced blood loss and transfusion rate |
| Tanasubsinn et al. 2017 [ | 81 | 61 | 41 | 40 | - Total drained blood - Transfusion rate | Bone plug did not reduce either blood loss or transfusion rate |
aTorres-Claramunt [9] reported 201 patients who were allocated to 3 groups: with bone plug, with bone cement, and without bone plug, respectively. Only data on the groups receiving/not receiving bone plug were included here
Fig. 1PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram summarizing study selection process
Fig. 2Risk of bias assessment in the included studies
Fig. 3Meta-analysis of post-operative hemoglobin reduction between the plugged and unplugged groups. CI Confidence interval, SD standard deviation
Fig. 4Meta-analysis of total drained blood between the plugged and unplugged groups
Fig. 5Meta-analysis of drained blood at 24 h after surgery between the plugged and unplugged groups
Fig. 6Meta-analysis of blood transfusion between the plugged and unplugged groups