Yae Won Park1, Sooyon Kim2, Chae Jung Park3, Sung Soo Ahn4, Kyunghwa Han1, Seok-Gu Kang5, Jong Hee Chang5, Se Hoon Kim6, Seung-Koo Lee1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. 2. Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. 4. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea. sungsoo@yuhs.ac. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 6. Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether radiomic features could improve the accuracy of survival predictions of IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) histological lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) over clinicopathological features. METHODS: Preoperative MRI data of 61 patients with IDHwt histological LGGs were included as the institutional training set. The test set consisted of 32 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Radiomic features (n = 186) were extracted using conventional MRIs. The radiomics risk score (RRS) for overall survival (OS) was derived from the elastic net. Multivariable Cox regression analyses with clinicopathological features (including epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] amplification and telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter [TERTp] mutation status) and the RRS were performed. The integrated area under the receiver operating curves (iAUCs) from the models with and without the RRS were compared. The net reclassification index (NRI) for 1-year OS was also calculated. The prognostic value of the RRS was evaluated using the external validation set. RESULTS: The RRS independently predicted OS (hazard ratio = 48.08; p = 0.001). Compared with the clinicopathological model alone, adding the RRS had a better OS prediction performance (iAUCs 0.775 vs. 0.910), which was internally validated (iAUCs 0.726 vs. 0.884, 1-year OS NRI = 0.497), and a similar trend was found on external validation (iAUCs 0.683 vs. 0.705, 1-year OS NRI = 0.733). The prognostic significance of the RRS was confirmed in the external validation set (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating radiomics with clinicopathological features (including EGFR amplification and TERTp mutation status) can improve survival prediction in patients with IDHwt LGGs. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics risk score has the potential to improve survival prediction when added to clinicopathological features (iAUCs increased from 0.775 to 0.910). • NRIs for 1-year OS showed that the radiomics risk score had incremental value over the clinicopathological model. • The prognostic significance of the radiomics risk score was confirmed in the external validation set (p = 0.001).
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether radiomic features could improve the accuracy of survival predictions of IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) histological lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) over clinicopathological features. METHODS: Preoperative MRI data of 61 patients with IDHwt histological LGGs were included as the institutional training set. The test set consisted of 32 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Radiomic features (n = 186) were extracted using conventional MRIs. The radiomics risk score (RRS) for overall survival (OS) was derived from the elastic net. Multivariable Cox regression analyses with clinicopathological features (including epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] amplification and telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter [TERTp] mutation status) and the RRS were performed. The integrated area under the receiver operating curves (iAUCs) from the models with and without the RRS were compared. The net reclassification index (NRI) for 1-year OS was also calculated. The prognostic value of the RRS was evaluated using the external validation set. RESULTS: The RRS independently predicted OS (hazard ratio = 48.08; p = 0.001). Compared with the clinicopathological model alone, adding the RRS had a better OS prediction performance (iAUCs 0.775 vs. 0.910), which was internally validated (iAUCs 0.726 vs. 0.884, 1-year OS NRI = 0.497), and a similar trend was found on external validation (iAUCs 0.683 vs. 0.705, 1-year OS NRI = 0.733). The prognostic significance of the RRS was confirmed in the external validation set (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating radiomics with clinicopathological features (including EGFR amplification and TERTp mutation status) can improve survival prediction in patients with IDHwt LGGs. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics risk score has the potential to improve survival prediction when added to clinicopathological features (iAUCs increased from 0.775 to 0.910). • NRIs for 1-year OS showed that the radiomics risk score had incremental value over the clinicopathological model. • The prognostic significance of the radiomics risk score was confirmed in the external validation set (p = 0.001).
Authors: Y W Park; K Han; S S Ahn; Y S Choi; J H Chang; S H Kim; S-G Kang; E H Kim; S-K Lee Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Maarten M J Wijnenga; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Pim J French; Nathalie E Synhaeve; Winand N M Dinjens; Peggy N Atmodimedjo; Johan M Kros; Clemens M F Dirven; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Niha Beig; Kaustav Bera; Prateek Prasanna; Jacob Antunes; Ramon Correa; Salendra Singh; Anas Saeed Bamashmos; Marwa Ismail; Nathaniel Braman; Ruchika Verma; Virginia B Hill; Volodymyr Statsevych; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Vinay Varadan; Anant Madabhushi; Pallavi Tiwari Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: C Mircea S Tesileanu; Linda Dirven; Maarten M J Wijnenga; Johan A F Koekkoek; Arnaud J P E Vincent; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Peggy N Atmodimedjo; Johan M Kros; Sjoerd G van Duinen; Marion Smits; Martin J B Taphoorn; Pim J French; Martin J van den Bent Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: David N Louis; Pieter Wesseling; Kenneth Aldape; Daniel J Brat; David Capper; Ian A Cree; Charles Eberhart; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Maryam Fouladi; Gregory N Fuller; Caterina Giannini; Christine Haberler; Cynthia Hawkins; Takashi Komori; Johan M Kros; H K Ng; Brent A Orr; Sung-Hye Park; Werner Paulus; Arie Perry; Torsten Pietsch; Guido Reifenberger; Marc Rosenblum; Brian Rous; Felix Sahm; Chitra Sarkar; David A Solomon; Uri Tabori; Martin J van den Bent; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller; Valerie A White; David W Ellison Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 6.508