| Literature DB >> 35762403 |
Xiangdan Meng1, Xuejiao Pang1, Kai Zhang2, Chenchen Gong3, Junyan Yang3, Haifeng Dong1,4, Xueji Zhang1,4.
Abstract
Fluorescence imaging with high sensitivity and minimal invasiveness has received tremendous attention, which can accomplish visualized monitoring and evaluation of cancer progression. Compared with the conventional first near-infrared (NIR-I) optical window (650-950 nm), fluorescence imaging in the second NIR optical window (NIR-II, 950-1700 nm) exhibits deeper tissue penetration capability and higher temporal-spatial resolution with lower background interference for achieving deep-tissue in vivo imaging and real-time monitoring of cancer development. Encouraged by the significant preponderances, a variety of multifunctional NIR-II fluorophores have been designed and fabricated for sensitively imaging biomarkers in vivo and visualizing the treatment procedure of cancers. In this review, the differences between NIR-I and NIR-II fluorescence imaging are briefly introduced, especially the advantages of NIR-II fluorescence imaging for the real-time visualization of tumors in vivo and cancer diagnosis. An important focus is to summarize the NIR-II fluorescence imaging for deep-tissue biomarker analysis in vivo and tumor tissue visualization, and a brief introduction of NIR-II fluorescence imaging-guided cancer therapy is also presented. Finally, the significant challenges and reasonable prospects of NIR-II fluorescence imaging for cancer diagnosis in clinical applications are outlined.Entities:
Keywords: NIR-II fluorescence imaging; biomarkers; cancer diagnosis; deep-tissue; visualized monitoring
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35762403 DOI: 10.1002/smll.202202035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Small ISSN: 1613-6810 Impact factor: 15.153