| Literature DB >> 35761813 |
Ying Zhang1, Wei Gao1, Xia Li1.
Abstract
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are characterized by augmented oxidative stress (OS) due to the imbalance between the generation of increased concentrations of oxidative molecules and decreased antioxidant capacity. Vitamin E-coated dialyzer membranes (VEMs) have previously been reported to alleviate the imbalance of redox metabolism in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis (HD); however, their effect on the deformability of red blood cells (RBCs) remains unknown. In the present study, 48 patients with ESRD undergoing HD were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups: HD with VEMs (VEM group; n=24) and HD with polysulfone dialyzer membranes (PM group; n=24), and another 24 healthy volunteers served as the control group. The present study investigated the morphological changes and deformability of RBCs in patients with ESRD and healthy volunteers. The concentration of serum vitamin E, the parameters of antioxidant stress and OS, and the degree of oxidative phosphorylation and clustering of anion exchanger 1 (Band 3) in RBCs were measured. The results obtained suggested that VEM treatment markedly ameliorated the abnormalities of RBC morphology and deformability in patients with ESRD undergoing HD. Mechanistic studies showed that VEM treatment led to a marked improvement in the concentration of serum vitamin E, which was positively associated with the restored antioxidant capacity, and decreased oxidative phosphorylation and clustering of Band 3 in RBCs of patients with ESRD undergoing HD. Taken together, the results of the present study have demonstrated that VEM treatment effectively restored the imbalance of redox metabolism, and improved the oxidative phosphorylation and clustering of Band 3 in RBCs of patients with ESRD undergoing HD via delivering vitamin E, which may alleviate the abnormal morphological and mechanical properties of RBCs. These findings are anticipated to be useful with respect to improving the nursing care and cure rate of patients with ESRD. Copyright: © Zhang et al.Entities:
Keywords: deformability; end-stage renal disease; oxidative stress; red blood cells; vitamin E-coated dialyzer membranes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35761813 PMCID: PMC9214592 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.751
Clinical parameters and causes of ESRD in patients and control subjects.
| A, Clinical parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Control (n=24) | PM (n=24) | VEM (n=24) |
| Age (year) | 54±12 | 55±15 | 50±14 |
| Sex (M/F) | 11/13 | 13/11 | 10/14 |
| Weight (kg) | 62±8 | 64±7 | 60±10 |
| HD treatment (months) | - | 26±16 | 33±18 |
| B, Cause of ESRD | |||
| Variable | Control (n=24) | PM (n=24) | VEM (n=24) |
| Polycystic kidney disease | - | 5 | 6 |
| Chronic kidney failure | - | 6 | 6 |
| Chronic glomerulonephritis | - | 4 | 3 |
| Nephrosclerosis | - | 1 | 2 |
| Others | - | 8 | 7 |
ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HD, hemodialysis; PM, polysulfone dialyzer membrane; VEM, vitamin E-coated dialyzer membrane; M, male; F, female.
Hematological parameters of the patients and control subjects.
| Control (n=24) | PM (n=24) | VEM (n=24) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Before | After 8 weeks | Before | After 8 weeks | Before | After 8 weeks |
| RBC, mil/µl | 5.21±0.14 | 5.32±0.16 | 3.88±0.18[ | 3.45±0.16[ | 3.79±0.34[ | 4.25±0.2[ |
| Hb, g/dl | 14.11±1.43 | 14.42±1.55 | 11.51±1.64[ | 10.32±1.26[ | 11.34±1.71[ | 12.70±1.52[ |
| RDW, % | 12.51±3.71 | 12.92±4.13 | 16.52±5.41[ | 17.34±6.43[ | 15.81±4.63[ | 14.55±3.74[ |
| Hct, % | 43.54±4.43 | 44.24±4.65 | 34.58±5.45[ | 32.72±6.51[ | 33.82±5.21[ | 37.52±4.93[ |
| MCHC, g/dl | 31.51±1.94 | 30.81±1.74 | 34.55±1.71 | 36.21±1.93 | 35.61±1.85 | 32.61±1.53 |
| MCH, pg | 32.83±1.31 | 31.83±1.51 | 30.11±1.53 | 28.91±1.74 | 30.73±2.65 | 31.51±2.34 |
| MCV, fl | 98.51±3.43 | 99.23±3.61 | 89.41±5.13[ | 87.15±5.91[ | 88.71±4.73[ | 94.71±4.43[ |
| HDL, mg/dl | 38.63 ± 9.74 | 37.81±9.55 | 39.41± 9.56 | 40.15± 9.66 | 38.91± 8.26 | 39.91± 10.51 |
| BUN, mg/dl | 14.82±4.61 | 14.53±4.41 | 52.11±8.12[ | 58.71±8.83[ | 52.51±9.70[ | 42.51±9.12[ |
| SCr, mg/dl | 0.68±0.14 | 0.69±0.15 | 7.69±2.47[ | 8.89±3.42[ | 7.78±1.35[ | 6.78±1.44[ |
| UA, mg/dl | 3.68±1.15 | 3.57±1.05 | 5.57±3.35[ | 5.89±3.87[ | 5.44±2.92[ | 4.44±2.61[ |
| CRP, mg/dl | 2.98±0.97 | 3.02±0.86 | 14.55±9.45[ | 15.75±9.88[ | 14.78±7.73[ | 9.78±6.83[ |
PM, polysulfone dialyzer membrane; VEM, vitamin E-coated dialyzer membrane; RBC, red blood cells; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; UA, uric acid; SCr, serum creatinine; CRP, C-reactive protein. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
aP<0.05, PM or VEM vs. control group before examination;
bP<0.05, VEM vs. control group 8 weeks after examination;
cP<0.05, VEM vs. PM group 8 weeks after examination.
Figure 1RBC morphology and deformability in patients with ESRD undergoing HD and healthy volunteers. (A) Representative RBC images were obtained using a scanning electron microscope in healthy donors and in patients with ESRD undergoing HD after 8 weeks (green arrows indicate dysmorphic RBCs; scale bar, 10 µm). (B) Percentages of dysmorphic RBCs. Erythrocyte deformability in healthy donors and patients with ESRD undergoing HD as reflected by the elongation index were tested under shear stress of (C) 3 Pa and (D) 30 Pa. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05, PM or VEM group vs. control group before examination; #P<0.05, VEM group vs. control group 8 weeks after examination; &P<0.05, VEM group vs. PM group 8 weeks after examination. PM, polysulfone dialyzer membranes; VEM, vitamin E-coated dialyzer membrane; RBC, red blood cell; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.
Figure 2RBC redox metabolism parameters in patients with ESRD undergoing HD and healthy volunteers. The oxidative stress parameters of (A) ROS, (B) MetHb and (C) MDA in RBCs of healthy donors and patients with ESRD undergoing HD. The antioxidant parameters of (D) FRAP, (E) CAT and (F) SOD in RBCs of healthy donors and patients with ESRD undergoing HD. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, PM or VEM group vs. control group before examination; #P<0.05, VEM group vs. control group 8 weeks after examination; &P<0.05, VEM group vs. PM group 8 weeks after examination. PM, polysulfone dialyzer membrane; VEM, vitamin E-coated dialyzer membrane; RBC, red blood cell; SOD, superoxide dismutase; FRAP, ferric-reducing ability of plasma; CAT, catalase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; MDA, malondialdehyde; MetHb, methemoglobin; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.
Figure 3Red blood cell serum vitamin E concentration in patients with ESRD undergoing HD and healthy volunteers. (A) Concentration of serum vitamin E in healthy donors and patients with ESRD undergoing HD. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. **P<0.01, PM or VEM group vs. control group before examination; #P<0.05, VEM group vs. control group 8 weeks after examination; &P<0.05, VEM group vs. PM group 8 weeks after examination. (B) Pearson correlation analysis between the concentration of serum vitamin E and the FRAP level in patients with ESRD undergoing HD (r=0.762, P<0.001). (C) Pearson correlation analysis between the concentration of serum vitamin E and the ROS level in patients with ESRD undergoing HD (r=0.795, P<0.001). FRAP, ferric-reducing ability of plasma; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; PM, polysulfone dialyzer membrane; VEM, vitamin E-coated dialyzer membrane.
Figure 4Oxidative phosphorylation of Band 3 in RBCs of patients with ESRD undergoing HD and healthy volunteers. (A) Expression levels of Band 3 and tyrosine-p-Band 3 (Tyr) in healthy donors and patients with ESRD undergoing HD (red boxes indicate highly expressed clustered Band 3). (B) Densitometric analyses of clustered Band 3. (C) Ratio of p-Band 3(Tyr)/total Band 3 is shown. (D) Representative fluorescence micrographs for Band 3-labeled RBCs in healthy donors and patients with ESRD undergoing HD after 8 weeks (white arrows indicate the crosslink of Band 3 in RBCs; scale bar, 10 µm). All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. *P<0.05, PM or VEM group vs. control group before examination; #P<0.05, VEM group vs. control group 8 weeks after examination; &P<0.05, VEM group vs. PM group 8 weeks after examination. ESRD, end-stage renal disease; PM, polysulfone dialyzer membrane; VEM, vitamin E-coated dialyzer membrane; RBC, red blood cell.