Literature DB >> 3576148

The healthy worker effect. Selection of workers and work forces.

T Wilcosky, S Wing.   

Abstract

The favorable health status of employed populations in comparison to that of the general population is often called the "healthy worker effect," and most researchers feel that it results from the selection of healthy individuals during the hiring process. However, other mechanisms may also contribute to the healthy worker effect. In particular, the healthy worker effect may reflect the selection, for epidemiologic study, of relatively advantaged workforces in terms of socioeconomic status and health. Evidence of differential health by socioeconomic status within the workforce is reviewed, and its possible role in the healthy worker effect is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3576148     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  11 in total

1.  Occupational history, self reported chronic illness, and mortality: a follow up of 25,586 Swedish men and women.

Authors:  P Ostlin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Sleep and sickness absence: a nationally representative register-based follow-up study.

Authors:  Tea Lallukka; Risto Kaikkonen; Tommi Härkänen; Erkki Kronholm; Timo Partonen; Ossi Rahkonen; Seppo Koskinen
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  The active comparator, new user study design in pharmacoepidemiology: historical foundations and contemporary application.

Authors:  Jennifer L Lund; David B Richardson; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-09-30

4.  Update of a prospective study of mortality and cancer incidence in the Australian petroleum industry.

Authors:  R T Gun; N L Pratt; E C Griffith; G G Adams; J A Bisby; K L Robinson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Health related selection and death rates in the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority workforce.

Authors:  L Carpenter; V Beral; P Fraser; M Booth
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1990-04

6.  Assessing the component associations of the healthy worker survivor bias: occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer mortality.

Authors:  Ashley I Naimi; Stephen R Cole; Michael G Hudgens; M Alan Brookhart; David B Richardson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Low bone mass is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  J Tamaki; M Iki; Y Hirano; Y Sato; E Kajita; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Work-family conflicts and health behaviors among British, Finnish, and Japanese employees.

Authors:  T Lallukka; T Chandola; E Roos; N Cable; M Sekine; S Kagamimori; T Tatsuse; M Marmot; E Lahelma
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2010-06

9.  External radiation dose and cancer mortality among French nuclear workers: considering potential confounding by internal radiation exposure.

Authors:  L Fournier; O Laurent; E Samson; S Caër-Lorho; P Laroche; B Le Guen; D Laurier; K Leuraud
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Changes in economic difficulties and subsequent sickness absence: a prospective register-linkage study.

Authors:  Tea Lallukka; Eero Lahelma; Ossi Rahkonen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.