| Literature DB >> 35761294 |
Ying Zhang1, Hong-Xi Chen1, Zi-Yan Shi1, Qin Du1, Jian-Cheng Wang1, Xiao-Fei Wang1, Yu-Han Qiu1, Yan-Lin Lang1, Ling-Yao Kong1, Lin-Jun Cai1, Xue Lin1, Zi-Chao Mou1, Wen-Qin Luo1, Shuang-Jie Li1, Hong-Yu Zhou2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many patients with neurological disorders experience chronic fatigue, but the neural mechanisms involved are unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebellum; Fatigue; Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; Nucleus accumbens; Pallidum
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35761294 PMCID: PMC9235096 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02757-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.903
Fig. 1The segmentation of deep gray matter
Comparisons of demographic and clinical characteristics between each patient subgroup and healthy controls
| Characteristic | Healthy controls | Low fatigue | High fatigue | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 45.2 ± 9.5 | 42.2 ± 11.8 | 47.1 ± 10.0 | 0.404 |
| Female, n (%) | 20(100%) | 15(88.2%) | 16(100%) | 0.111 |
| Years of education | 9.0 ± 2.7 | 9.9 ± 3.5 | 8.6 ± 3.3 | 0.467 |
| EDSS score | – | 3.5 (1.5,4) | 3.3 (2.3,4) | 0.637 |
| Disease duration, yr | – | 6.7 (4.3,9.8) | 3.3 (2.4,7.3) | 0.081 |
| HAMA score | 0 (0,2.5) | 5 (2,7) | 7.5 (4.5,12.5) | 0.000 |
| HRSD score | 0 (0,1.5) | 2 (1,7) | 9.5 (5,14.5) | 0.000 |
| Global FIS score | 0 (0,0) | 20 (13,39) | 71.5 (58,108.5) | 0.000 |
Values are mean ± SD or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise noted
yr years, EDSS Expanded Disability Status, HAMA Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HRSD Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, FIS Fatigue Impact Scale
Comparisons of volumes of deep gray matter between each patient subgroup and healthy controls, corrected by the eTIV provided by the Freesurfer pipeline
| Anatomical structures | Healthy controls | Low fatigue | High fatigue | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caudate nucleus | Left | 0.2435 ± 0.0230 | 0.2458 ± 0.0278 | 0.2441 ± 0.0161 | 0.951 |
| Right | 0.2530 ± 0.0235 | 0.2556 ± 0.0304 | 0.2542 ± 0.0199 | 0.952 | |
| Putamen | Left | 0.3562 ± 0.0271 | 0.3584 ± 0.0547 | 0.3550 ± 0.0481 | 0.974 |
| Right | 0.3507 ± 0.0275 | 0.3669 ± 0.0489 | 0.3420 ± 0.0465 | 0.219 | |
| Pallidum | Left | 0.1372 ± 0.0145 | 0.1454 ± 0.0193 | 0.1573 ± 0.0214 | |
| Right | 0.1302 ± 0.0145 | 0.1426 ± 0.0153 | 0.1466 ± 0.0238 | ||
| Amygdala | Left | 0.1105 ± 0.0131 | 0.1078 ± 0.0170 | 0.1103 ± 0.0125 | 0.829 |
| Right | 0.1239 ± 0.0083 | 0.1209 ± 0.0169 | 0.1207 ± 0.0126 | 0.705 | |
| Hippocampus | Left | 0.2868 ± 0.0224 | 0.2844 ± 0.0183 | 0.2848 ± 0.0245 | 0.935 |
| Right | 0.2959 ± 0.0230 | 0.2932 ± 0.0209 | 0.2899 ± 0.0284 | 0.763 | |
| Nucleus accumbens | Left | 0.0417 ± 0.0052 | 0.0377 ± 0.0052 | 0.0361 ± 0.0071 | |
| Right | 0.0372 ± 0.0033 | 0.0369 ± 0.0056 | 0.0357 ± 0.0053 | 0.625 | |
| Thalamus proper | Left | 0.4974 ± 0.0376 | 0.5133 ± 0.0606 | 0.4814 ± 0.0581 | 0.225 |
| Right | 0.4707 ± 0.0326 | 0.4840 ± 0.0395 | 0.4616 ± 0.0482 | 0.276 |
Values are mean ± SD of corrected volumes (structure volume / eTIV × 100). eTIV estimated intracranial volume
Fig. 2Corrected volumes (mean ± SD) of the bilateral pallidum and left nucleus accumbens between each patient subgroup and healthy controls. * indicating a significant difference adjusted for age, sex, years of education, anxiety and depression; eTIV, estimated intracranial volume; HCs, healthy controls; LF, low fatigue group; HF, high fatigue group
Multiple linear regression to identify relationships between certain disease variables and corrected deep gray matter volumes in 33 patients with NMOSD
| Variable | Left pallidum | Left nucleus accumbens | Right pallidum |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDSS | 0.000, 0.942 | 0.001, 0.177 | −0.000, 0.996 |
| Disease duration | −0.002, 0.016 | −0.000, 0.774 | −0.001, 0.419 |
Values are shown as coefficients, followed by p value. The analysis was adjusted for age, sex, years of education, anxiety and depression. NMOSD neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
Brain regions with significantly decreased functional connectivity in NMOSD patients with high fatigue compared to patients with low fatigue
| Seed ROIs | Brain regions | Peak MNI | Cluster voxels | Peak z value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | |||||
| Analysis 1* | Left pallidum | Left cerebellum posterior lobe | −39 | −57 | −36 | 38 | −4.5611 |
| Right cerebellum posterior lobe | 30 | −63 | −36 | 42 | −4.8523 | ||
| Analysis 2# | Left pallidum | Left cerebellum posterior lobe | −39 | −57 | −36 | 33 | −4.3456 |
| Right cerebellum posterior lobe | 30 | −63 | −36 | 34 | −4.7087 | ||
NMOSD neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, ROIs regions of interest, MNI Montreal Neurological Institute
*, with FD_Jenkinson as covariate; #, with FD_Jenkinson, age, sex, years of education and scores on the HAMA and HRSD as covariates
Fig. 3Decreased functional connectivity of NMOSD patients with high fatigue compared to patients with low fatigue. The left pallidum was set as the seeding region of interest. Covariates were FD_Jenkinson, age, sex, years of education and scores on the HAMA and HRSD. The color bar displayed Z-values. NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder