Literature DB >> 3576020

Robustness of the two independent samples t-test when applied to ordinal scaled data.

T Heeren, R D'Agostino.   

Abstract

One may encounter the application of the two independent samples t-test to ordinal scaled data (for example, data that assume only the values 0, 1, 2, 3) from small samples. This situation clearly violates the underlying normality assumption for the t-test and one cannot appeal to large sample theory for validity. In this paper we report the results of an investigation of the t-test's robustness when applied to data of this form for samples of sizes 5 to 20. Our approach consists of complete enumeration of the sampling distributions and comparison of actual levels of significance with the significance level expected if the data followed a normal distribution. We demonstrate under general conditions the robustness of the t-test in that the maximum actual level of significance is close to the declared level.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3576020     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780060110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  30 in total

1.  Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project.

Authors:  John C Morey; Robert Simon; Gregory D Jay; Robert L Wears; Mary Salisbury; Kimberly A Dukes; Scott D Berns
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A graduate student mentoring program to develop interest in research.

Authors:  Mary E Kiersma; Nicholas Hagemeier; Aleda M H Chen; Brittany Melton; Marwa Noureldin; Kimberly S Plake
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  The impact of Parkinson disease on patients' sexuality and relationship.

Authors:  C Buhmann; S Dogac; E Vettorazzi; U Hidding; C Gerloff; T P Jürgens
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Preservation of Childbearing Potential in Cancer Survivors: a Survey of Gynecologists' and Embryologists' Current Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice.

Authors:  Reza Omani-Samani; Samira Vesali
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Continuous cotemporal probabilistic modeling of systems biology networks from sparse data.

Authors:  David J John; Jacquelyn S Fetrow; James L Norris
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Analysing force-pCa curves.

Authors:  John S Walker; Xiaotao Li; Peter M Buttrick
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 7.  Review: analysis of parasite and other skewed counts.

Authors:  Neal Alexander
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Measuring symptoms in terminal cancer: are pain and dyspnoea controlled?

Authors:  I Higginson; M McCarthy
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Gary S Collins; Rasmus Oestergaard Nielsen; Maryam Nazemipour; Nicholas P Jewell; Douglas G Altman; Michael J Campbell
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 18.473

10.  Efficacy and Safety Study of Wearable Cyborg HAL (Hybrid Assistive Limb) in Hemiplegic Patients With Acute Stroke (EARLY GAIT Study): Protocols for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hiroki Watanabe; Aiki Marushima; Hideki Kadone; Yukiyo Shimizu; Shigeki Kubota; Tenyu Hino; Masayuki Sato; Yoshiro Ito; Mikito Hayakawa; Hideo Tsurushima; Kazushi Maruo; Yasushi Hada; Eiichi Ishikawa; Yuji Matsumaru
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.