| Literature DB >> 35759667 |
Jennifer C Stern1, Charles A Malespin1, Jennifer L Eigenbrode1, Christopher R Webster2, Greg Flesch2, Heather B Franz1, Heather V Graham1, Christopher H House3, Brad Sutter4,5, Paul Douglas Archer4,5, Amy E Hofmann2, Amy C McAdam1, Douglas W Ming5, Rafael Navarro-Gonzalez6, Andrew Steele7, Caroline Freissinet8, Paul R Mahaffy1.
Abstract
The Sample Analysis at Mars instrument stepped combustion experiment on a Yellowknife Bay mudstone at Gale crater, Mars revealed the presence of organic carbon of Martian and meteoritic origins. The combustion experiment was designed to access refractory organic carbon in Mars surface sediments by heating samples in the presence of oxygen to combust carbon to CO2. Four steps were performed, two at low temperatures (less than ∼550 °C) and two at high temperatures (up to ∼870 °C). More than 950 μg C/g was released at low temperatures (with an isotopic composition of δ13C = +1.5 ± 3.8‰) representing a minimum of 431 μg C/g indigenous organic and inorganic Martian carbon components. Above 550 °C, 273 ± 30 μg C/g was evolved as CO2 and CO (with estimated δ13C = -32.9‰ to -10.1‰ for organic carbon). The source of high temperature organic carbon cannot be definitively confirmed by isotopic composition, which is consistent with macromolecular organic carbon of igneous origin, meteoritic infall, or diagenetically altered biomass, or a combination of these. If from allochthonous deposition, organic carbon could have supported both prebiotic organic chemistry and heterotrophic metabolism at Gale crater, Mars, at ∼3.5 Ga.Entities:
Keywords: Mars; astrobiology; carbon isotopes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35759667 PMCID: PMC9271195 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2201139119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 12.779
Fig. 1.(A) Landing ellipse of the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity Rover at Gale Crater, Mars. (B) Rover Traverse from 2012 to 2022. Red dot shows the location of the Cumberland sample in the Yellowknife Bay formation. (C) Rover scale view of the Sheepbed mudstone member of the Yellowknife Bay formation, with locations of John Klein and Cumberland drill holes. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU, NASA/JPL-Caltech/Univ. of Arizona and Scott Rowland, NASA JPL-Caltech/MSSS.
Selected TLS and QMS data for each step
| Oxidant | TLS | QMS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ18O (‰) | CO2 μmol | μg C/g | CO2-δ13C (‰) | CO2-δ18O (‰) | CO2 μmol | CO nmol | O2 nmol | CH4 nmol | ||
| <550 °C | Step 1 | +41‰ Mars O2 | 14 ± 0.1 | 957 ± 38 | +1.5 ± 3.8 | +55.0 ± 5.5 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Step 2 | +20‰ Tank O2 | 5.1 ± 0.03 | 340 ± 13 | −4.3 ± 4.3 | +58.2 ± 7.0 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 72 ± 95 | 61 ± 19 | 182 ± 16 | |
| <870 °C | Step 3 | +20‰ Tank O2 | 2.5 ± 0.01 | 166 ± 7 | −16.2 ± 3.1 | +28 ± 5.6 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 93 ± 206 | 180 ± 28 | 15 ± 4 |
| Step 4 | +20‰ Tank O2 | 1.2 ± 0.01 | 80 ± 3 | +2.5 ± 4.4 | +46 ± 4.5 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 315 ± 49 | 24 ± 15 | 8 ± 1 | |
Step 1 used oxychlorine native to Mars as the oxidant instead of tank O2. No QMS data are available for step 1 due to QMS shut down. Steps 2 to 4 used the SAM O2 tank carried for this purpose. The cup was returned to the sample manipulation system between steps 1 and 2 to estimate instrument background sources of carbon (). Step 3 was designed to access refractory carbon. Step 4 was designed to access refractory carbon not combusted in step 3
*CH4 was saturated in step 2 so value represents lower limit.
Comparison of refractory carbon abundance in various planetary materials
| Material | Carbon concentration (μg C/g) | Comment/Ref |
|---|---|---|
| Combustion CO2 <550 °C | 957 ± 38 | Combination of instrument C and at least ∼430 μg C/g Martian C |
| Combustion CO2 <550 °C | 340 ± 13 | Mostly instrument C |
| Combustion CO2 + CO >550 °C | 273 ± 30 (201–273) | Refractory and mineral-stablized organic C, includes C from both CO2 and CO. (Range reflects presence/absence of carbonate) |
| Pyrolysis <550 °C | 667–827 | Sutter et al. ( |
| Pyrolysis >550 °C | 72 ± 7 | Sourced from carbonate, organics, or both |
| Estimated contribution from instrument sources to pyrolysis of CB mudstone | 163–237 | Calculated from MTBSTFA estimates from Freissinet et al. ( |
| Pyrolysis >500 °C Sheepbed mudstone–hydrocarbon fragments | 5.6–6.7 | Eigenbrode et al. ( |
| Pyrolysis >500 °C Murray mudstone–hydrocarbon fragments | 8.8–24.4 | Eigenbrode et al. ( |
| Martian meteorite igneous organic carbon released by combustion >600 °C and <1,000 °C | 1.3–150 | Steele et al. ( |
| Estimates of total organic carbon concentration in Mars regolith due to exogenous inputs | 10 | Carrillo-Sanchez et al. ( |
Fig. 2.TLS and QMS carbon abundances and TLS δ13C data. Bulk δ13C for steps 3 and 4 combined is −3.6 ± 3.1‰.
Fig. 3.Carbon isotopic composition of carbon reservoirs on Mars. Our combustion data overlap with both igneous refractory carbon, meteoritic organics, and carbonate carbon. Atmospheric data from (29); Meteoritic EOM from (25, 26); Meteoritic IOM data from (34); Carbonate SNC range from (48); ALH84001 data from (7, 50); Igneous refractory carbon from (1); Gale Crater data from (13) Box and whiskers show the median, upper and lower quartiles, and maximum and minimum values, with outlier values shown as black dots.