Literature DB >> 35759206

Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Recommendations in Patients With Curable Esophageal and Gastric Cancers.

Joel Jia Yi Soon1, Yue Zhao2, Nicholas Brian Shannon2, Jeremy Tian Hui Tan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) discussion is standard practice in the management of Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers. However, poor adherence to MDT recommendations may account for the lack of improved oncological outcomes with MDTs. We aim to quantify adherence rates and compare outcomes between adherent and non-adherent patients.
METHODS: We included all patients with potentially curable primary UGI carcinomas who were discussed at UGI MDT from 2017 to 2018. MDT recommendations were compared to actual treatment received. Oncological and survival outcomes were compared between both groups.
RESULTS: Amongst 153 patients, 64 (41.8%) were non-adherent to MDT recommendations. Reasons for non-adherence were patient refusal (50.0%), treatment-related complications (31.3%), disease factors (17.2%) and clinician decision (1.56%). Univariate analysis showed that non-adherent patients were older (71.6 vs 65.2 years, p < 0.001), with higher clinical stage at point of diagnosis (p = 0.028), pathological stage after resection (p < 0.001) and were more likely to be recommended for multimodal therapy. No significant factors were associated with non-adherence at multivariate analysis. Non-adherent patients had worse median overall survival (19.5 months) compared to adherent patients (not reached at follow-up) with both unmatched and propensity-score matched analysis. Patients who received only part of the intended adjuvant chemotherapy course had worse median overall survival and disease-free survival compared to patients who completed or did not initiate adjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence to MDT recommendations was associated with advanced age and tumor stage, and potentially contributes to the worse oncological outcomes in a group of patients already predisposed to poor outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Cancer; Esophageal; Gastric; Multidisciplinary

Year:  2022        PMID: 35759206     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00847-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  13 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

Authors:  Rebecca A Levine; Bhani Chawla; Shelli Bergeron; Harry Wasvary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Effects of multidisciplinary care on the survival of patients with oral cavity cancer in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yueh-Hsin Wang; Pei-Tseng Kung; Wen-Chen Tsai; Chih-Jaan Tai; Shih-An Liu; Ming-Hsui Tsai
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature.

Authors:  J M Croke; S El-Sayed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Do patients discussed at a lung cancer multidisciplinary team meeting receive guideline-recommended treatment?

Authors:  Miriam M Boxer; Kirsten J Duggan; Joseph Descallar; Shalini K Vinod
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.601

5.  A single-institution prospective evaluation of a neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team meeting.

Authors:  Malaka Ameratunga; Dorothea Miller; Wayne Ng; Mori Wada; Augusto Gonzalvo; Lawrence Cher; Hui K Gan
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board routinely impacts therapeutic plans in patients with lung and esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Henner M Schmidt; John M Roberts; Artur M Bodnar; Sonia Kunz; Steven H Kirtland; Richard P Koehler; Michal Hubka; Donald E Low
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Brindha Pillay; Addie C Wootten; Helen Crowe; Niall Corcoran; Ben Tran; Patrick Bowden; Jane Crowe; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Compliance with multidisciplinary team meeting management recommendations.

Authors:  Amali Samarasinghe; Arlene Chan; Diana Hastrich; Richard Martin; Albert Gan; Farah Abdulaziz; Margaret Latham; Yvonne Zissiadis; Mandy Taylor; Peter Willsher
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.601

9.  Adjuvant treatments for gastric cancer: from practice guidelines to clinical practice.

Authors:  Anne Marie Bouvier; Gilles Créhange; Caroline Azélie; Nicolas Cheynel; Jean Louis Jouve; Laurent Bedenne; Jean Faivre; Côme Lepage; Philippe Maingon
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.088

10.  Multidisciplinary team consultation for resectable Gastric Cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Yonghe Chen; Jun Xiang; Dan Liu; Jian Xiao; Fei Xiong; Kaikai Wei; Aihong Liu; Shi Chen; Yaxi Zhu; Xiaochun Meng; Junsheng Peng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.