Literature DB >> 35759069

Lower Compliance with Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Vegetarians in North America.

Jisoo Oh1, Keiji Oda2,3, Kaitlyn Dang2, Yermek Ibrayev2, Gary E Fraser2,4, Synnove F Knutsen2,5.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is preventable and treatable through regular screening and follow-up. However, the utilization of cervical cancer screening may vary widely based on individual lifestyles. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in the adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines in various dietary groups. Our study included 21,376 women from the United States and Canada, aged 30-69 from the Adventist Health Study-2, a large population-based prospective cohort study. Modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimation was used to determine the prevalence ratios of cervical cancer screening behavior in participants following five different dietary patterns (non-vegetarians, semi-vegetarians, pesco-vegetarians, lacto-ovo-vegetarians, and vegans). All analyses were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, personal income, body mass index, smoking, alcohol use, exercise, and family history of all female cancer. Vegetarians, in general, had similar screening prevalence as non-vegetarians. However, vegans were 16% less likely to have had a Pap test compared to non-vegetarians (prevalence ratio (PR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.86). Women who were younger, Black, married, more educated, had a family history of all female cancer, had a higher income, and exercise reported higher compliance to a Pap test. It remains to be seen whether vegan women in Adventist Health-2 experience a higher incidence of cervical cancer or are diagnosed at a later stage compared to non-vegetarians.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; Dietary patterns; Pap test; Vegan diet

Year:  2022        PMID: 35759069     DOI: 10.1007/s10935-022-00691-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prev (2022)        ISSN: 2731-5533


  28 in total

1.  Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening.

Authors:  Maggie Cooper
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2011 Mar 2-8

2.  Cohort profile: The Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).

Authors:  Terry L Butler; Gary E Fraser; W Lawrence Beeson; Synnøve F Knutsen; R Patti Herring; Jacqueline Chan; Joan Sabaté; Susanne Montgomery; Ella Haddad; Susan Preston-Martin; Hannelore Bennett; Karen Jaceldo-Siegl
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic review.

Authors:  Kelly Ackerson; Stephanie D Preston
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Why the Pap test? Awareness and use of the Pap test among women in the United States.

Authors:  Nikki A Hawkins; Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya; Cynthia A Gelb; Lindsey Polonec
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Factors influencing men's decisions regarding prostate cancer screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Eric K Shaw; John G Scott
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-10

6.  Role of patient race/ethnicity, insurance and age on Pap smear compliance across ten community health centers in Florida.

Authors:  Nicole Cook; Erin Kobetz; Isildinha Reis; Lora Fleming; D Loer-Martin; Saint Anthony Amofah
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Susan J Curry; Alex H Krist; Douglas K Owens; Michael J Barry; Aaron B Caughey; Karina W Davidson; Chyke A Doubeni; John W Epling; Alex R Kemper; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Maureen G Phipps; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Health effects of vegan diets.

Authors:  Winston J Craig
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Sociodemographic factors associated with cervical cancer screening coverage and follow-up of high grade abnormal results in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  L Elit; R Saskin; R Raut; L Elliott; J Murphy; L Marrett
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Influence of Spirituality and Modesty on Acceptance of Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Eileen O Dareng; Elima Jedy-Agba; Patience Bamisaye; Fatima Isa Modibbo; Lawal O Oyeneyin; Ayodele S Adewole; Olayinka B Olaniyan; Patrick S Dakum; Paul D Pharoah; Clement A Adebamowo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.