| Literature DB >> 35758925 |
Hefeng Tian1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Ying Fan1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Lei Yang1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Sai Hou1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Wen Huang1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Ruizhi Dong1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Shaodong Li1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Xuanrui Zhu1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Wenlong Liu1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Guanghuan Shi1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Xiaoke Li1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Shiping Zhou1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, Xiu Wang1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13.
Abstract
The quality of bowel preparation is an extremely important determinant of colonoscopy results. However, the efficacy of senna regimens in improving bowel cleanliness is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize data on whether using a senna bowel preparation regimen enhances the bowel cleanliness. We searched Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases (from the inception to August 2021). The primary efficacy outcome was bowel cleanliness. Secondary outcomes included patient compliance, tolerance, and adverse events. Eleven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria (3,343 patients. Overall, we found no significant differences in bowel cleanliness between the senna regimen and other bowel preparation regimens (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.02 [0.63, 1.67], p = 0.93). There was significant difference in tolerance (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.66 [1.08, 2.54], p = .02) and compliance (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 3.05 [1.42, 6.55], p = .004). The senna regimen yielded a significantly greater proportion of no nausea (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.84 [1.45, 2.32]) and vomiting (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.65 [0.81, 3.35]). Compared with other bowel preparation regimens, the senna regimen may be effective and safe in bowel cleaning before colonoscopy, with superior compliance and tolerance.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35758925 DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Nurs ISSN: 1042-895X Impact factor: 0.978