| Literature DB >> 35758682 |
Yanpeng Li1, Le Cao1, Mei Ye2,3, Rong Xu1, Xin Chen2,3, Yingying Ma1, Ren-Rong Tian2, Feng-Liang Liu2, Peng Zhang1, Yi-Qun Kuang4, Yong-Tang Zheng2,3, Chiyu Zhang1.
Abstract
Intravenous drug users (IDUs) are a high-risk group for HIV-1, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections, which are the leading causes of death in IDUs. However, the plasma virome of IDUs and how it is influenced by above viral infections remain unclear. Using viral metagenomics, we determined the plasma virome of IDUs and its association with HIV-1, HCV, and/or HBV infections. Compared with healthy individuals, IDUs especially those with major viral infections had higher viral abundance and diversity. Anelloviridae dominated plasma virome. Coinfections of multiple anelloviruses were common, and anelloviruses from the same genus tended to coexist together. In this study, 4,487 anellovirus ORF1 sequences were identified, including 1,620 (36.1%) with less than 69% identity to any known sequences, which tripled the current number. Compared with healthy controls (HC), more anellovirus sequences were observed in neg-IDUs, and HIV-1, HCV, and/or HBV infections further expanded the sequence number in IDUs, which was characterized by the emergence of novel divergent taxons and blooms of resident anelloviruses. Pegivirus was mainly identified in infected IDUs. Five main pegivirus transmission clusters (TCs) were identified by phylogenetic analysis, suggesting a transmission link. Similar anellovirus profiles were observed in IDUs within the same TC, suggesting transmission of anellome among IDUs. Our data suggested that IDUs suffered higher plasma viral burden especially anelloviruses, which was associated with HIV-1, HCV, and/or HBV infections. Blooms in abundance and unprecedented diversity of anellovirus highlighted active evolution and replication of this virus in blood circulation, and an uncharacterized role it may engage with the host. IMPORTANCE Virome is associated with immune status and determines or influences disease progression through both pathogenic and resident viruses. Increased viral burden in IDUs especially those with major viral infections indicated the suboptimal immune status and high infection risks of these population. Blooms in abundance and unprecedented diversity of anellovirus highlighted its active evolution and replication in the blood circulation, and sensitive response to other viral infections. In addition, transmission cluster analysis revealed the transmission link of pegivirus among IDUs, and the individuals with transmission links shared similar anellome profiles. In-depth monitoring of the plasma virome in high-risk populations is not only needed for surveillance for emerging viruses and transmission networks of major and neglected bloodborne viruses, but also important for a better understanding of commensal viruses and their role it may engage with immune system.Entities:
Keywords: HCV; HIV-1; IDUs; anellovirus; plasma virome; transmission cluster; viral expansion
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35758682 PMCID: PMC9431549 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01447-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
Characteristics of healthy participants and IDUs in this study
| Sociodemographics | Healthy control | Intravenous drug users (IDUs) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neg-IDUs | HIV-1+ | HCV+ | HIV-1/hCV+ | HBV+ | ||
| No. of individuals | 11 | 23 | 26 | 11 | 29 | 10 |
| Age | 31 (19 to 60) | 30 (21 to 37) | 31 (22 to 53) | 29 (21 to 39) | 31 (18 to 43) | 30.5 (28 to 36) |
| Gender (male/female) | 11/0 | 23/0 | 20/0 | 10/1 | 25/4 | 11/0 |
| Higher education | 9.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Married | 10 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
| Single/divorced | 1 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 23 | 8 |
| Duration of drug use/y | 3.5 (1 to 16) | 8.0 (1 to 20) | 4.0 (1 to 13) | 10.0 (1 to 22) | 6.0 (2 to 15) | |
| Frequency of drug use (times/day) | 3.0 (0.3 to 7) | 3.0 (1.5 to 10) | 3.0 (1 to 3) | 3.5 (1 to 9) | 4.0 (1 to 5) | |
| Syringe sharing | 38.1% | 60.0% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 77.8% | |
| Times of repeated syringe use | 1.0 (1 to 10) | 2.0 (1 to 8) | 1.5 (1 to 5) | 2.0 (1 to 10) | 3.0 (1 to 5) | |
| Cleaning method | ||||||
| Tap water | 75% | 50% | 66.7% | 78.6% | 71.4% | |
| Boiled water | 25% | 28.6% | 16.7% | 7.1% | 14.3% | |
| Never | 0 | 21.4% | 16.7% | 14.3% | 14.3% | |
| STD | 10.0% | 5.9% | 33.3% | 0 | 22.2% | |
| Sexual partners | 3.0 (0 to 10) | 1.0 (0 to 6) | 2.0 (0 to 5) | 1.0 (0 to 5) | 3.0 (1 to 10) | |
| Ways of drug use | ||||||
| Intravenous | 33.3% | 23.8% | 70.0% | 65.0% | 44.4% | |
| Intravenous and oral | 66.7% | 76.2% | 30.0% | 35.0% | 55.6% | |
| Drug rehabilitation times | 2.0 (1 to 4) | 2.0 (1 to 15) | 2.0 (1 to 5) | 4.0 (2 to 15) | 2.5 (1 to 5) | |
| Other drug use | 74.7% | 75.0% | 85.7% | 78.9% | 100% | |
Healthy control group (non-IDU and without main viral infections).
STD, sexually transmitted disease.
IDUs without HIV-1/HCV/HBV infections.
Other drugs include Diazepam and Triazolam.
FIG 1Summary of the viral compositions detected in this study. The donut chart shows the distribution of all viral reads according to taxonomical ranks (a). Relative abundance of main vertebrate viruses (b) and prokaryotic viruses (bacteriophages) (c) in different groups.
FIG 2Viral abundance and diversity among different groups. Viral abundance was shown as reads per million (RPM) (a). Viral diversity was shown for each group with richness score (number of annotated taxons) (b), Inverse Simpson index (c), and Shannon index (d).
FIG 3Expansion and distribution of anelloviruses among different groups. Number of annotated anelloviruses (a). Relative abundance of three anellovirus genera in different groups (b). Abundance (log10 reads) of Anelloviridae (c), alpha-(d), beta-(e), and gammatorquevirus (f).
FIG 4Unprecedented plasma anellovirus diversity. Number of anellovirus ORF1 sequences (>1,500 bp) in each group (a). Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of ORF1 sequences. Arrows to the right of the tree indicate the positions of reference sequences (b). Distributions of new ORF1 sequences with over or below 69% identity to all currently known anelloviruses (c).
FIG 5Blooms and coexistence of certain anelloviruses. Comparison of within individual pairwise distances between different groups (a). Distributions of ORF1 sequence clusters that have different identities (b). Venn diagrams of different anellovirus taxons between healthy individuals, neg-IDUs, IDUs with HIV-1/HCV/HBV infections (c), and IDUs with different infection patterns (d). Co-occurrence network of different anelloviruses. Viruses in the same network were highlighted with same color. Bigger size of the circle means more viruses it interacts with, and the line between two circles indicates the frequency of the co-occurrence. TTV, Torque teno virus; TTMV, Torque teno mini virus; TTMDV, Torque teno midi virus; TLMV, TTV-like mini virus; STTV, Simian torque teno virus; AV, anellovirus.
FIG 6Transmission of pegivirus and anellovirus among IDUs. (a) Maximum-likelihood phylogentic tree of human pegivirus C. Three human pegivirus genotypes are highlighted with orange, blue, and green colors. Five transmission clusters (TC1 to 5) are labeled. Pie charts to the right show the individual anellome profile within each TC (presence of each anellovirus), only top 15 abundant anelloviruses are shown. (b) Relatedness of anellovirus reads within TC versus unrelated individuals (also described in Table S3). Relatedness was compared with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.