| Literature DB >> 35758326 |
Mayank Sharma1,2, Michael A Bellio3, Merline Benny1,2, Shathiyah Kulandavelu1,3, Pingping Chen1,2, Chawisa Janjindamai1,2, Chenxu Han2, Liming Chang2, Shanique Sterling1,2, Kevin Williams1,2, Andreas Damianos1,2, Sunil Batlahally1,2, Kaitlyn Kelly1,2, Daniela Aguilar-Caballero1,2, Ronald Zambrano1,2, Shaoyi Chen1,2, Jian Huang1,2, Shu Wu1,2, Joshua M Hare3,4, Augusto Schmidt1,2, Aisha Khan3, Karen Young1,2,3.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) extracellular vesicles (EVs) have beneficial effects in preclinical bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH) models. The optimal source, dosing, route, and duration of effects are however unknown. The objectives of this study were to (a) compare the efficacy of GMP-grade EVs obtained from Wharton's Jelly MSCs (WJ-MSCs) and bone marrow (BM-MSCs), (b) determine the optimal dosing and route of administration, (c) evaluate its long-term effects, and (d) determine how MSC EVs alter the lung transcriptome. Newborn rats exposed to normoxia or hyperoxia (85% O2) from postnatal day (P)1-P14 were given (a) intra-tracheal (IT) BM or WJ-MSC EVs or placebo, (b) varying doses of IT WJ-MSC EVs, or (c) IT or intravenous (IV) WJ-MSC EVs on P3. Rats were evaluated at P14 or 3 months. Early administration of IT BM-MSC or WJ-MSC EVs had similar beneficial effects on lung structure and PH in hyperoxia-exposed rats. WJ-MSC EVs however had superior effects on cardiac remodeling. Low, medium, and high dose WJ-MSC EVs had similar cardiopulmonary regenerative effects. IT and IV WJ-MSC EVs similarly improved vascular density and reduced PH in hyperoxic rats. Gene-set enrichment analysis of transcripts differentially expressed in WJ-MSC EV-treated rats showed that induced transcripts were associated with angiogenesis. Long-term studies demonstrated that a single early MSC EV dose has pulmonary vascular protective effects 3 months after administration. Together, our findings have significant translational implications as it provides critical insight into the optimal source, dosing, route, mechanisms of action, and duration of effects of MSC-EVs for BPD-PH.Entities:
Keywords: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; extracellular vesicles; mesenchymal stem cell; preterm; pulmonary hypertension
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35758326 PMCID: PMC9397655 DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szac041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med ISSN: 2157-6564 Impact factor: 7.655
Figure 1.Effective delivery of intra-tracheal (IT) MSC extracellular vesicles (EVs). (A) Representative bioluminescence images of neonatal rats taken 30, 60, and 90 minutes following IT administration of fluorescent labeled MSC EVs or placebo (PL). (B) Ex vivo imaging performed 90 minutes post-IT injection shows increased fluorescent signal in the lungs, kidney and liver.
Figure 2.Effect of BM and WJ-MSC EVs on growth and survival. (A) No difference in growth velocity among room air and hyperoxia groups. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve showing differences in survival between room air and hyperoxia exposed rats. Compared to room air placebo (PL) rats, there was significantly increased mortality of hyperoxia PL-treated rats, *P < .05; room air PL vs. hyperoxia PL; N = 9/group. No difference in survival among the hyperoxia groups.
Figure 3.BM and WJ-MSC EVs have similar effects in BPD and PH. Both IT BM-MSC and WJ-MSC EVs significantly reduced (A) right ventricular systolic pressure and (B) weight ratio of the right ventricle to left ventricle + septum (RV/LV+S) but the reduction in RV/LV+S was greater in 2 week old hyperoxia exposed rats who received WJ-MSC EVs. (C) Representative lung sections stained with Von Willebrand Factor showing increased vessels in both IT hyperoxia BM-MSC and WJ-MSC EV treated groups. Original magnification 10×. (D) Similar improvement in lung vascular density in both IT hyperoxia BM-MSC and WJ-MSC EV groups. (E) Lung sections stained with α-smooth muscle actin demonstrating decreased pulmonary vascular remodeling in hyperoxia-exposed rats treated with IT BM-MSC or WJ-MSC EV. Original magnification 40×. (F) Reduced medial wall thickness in hyperoxia-exposed rats treated with IT BM-MSC or WJ-MSC EVs. (G) H&E-stained lung sections demonstrating improved alveolar structure in hyperoxia-exposed rats that received IT BM-MSC or WJ-MSC EV. Original magnification 10×. Inset is 40×. Morphometric analysis showing (H) decreased mean linear intercept and (I) increased radial alveolar count in IT BM-MSC or WJ-MSC EV treated hyperoxia rats. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; N = 9/group. *P < .05; room air placebo (PL) vs. hyperoxia PL or hyperoxia PL vs. hyperoxia BM-MSC or WJ-MSC EV. #P < .05, hyperoxia BM-MSC EV vs. hyperoxia WJ-MSC EV. Room air: open bar; hyperoxia: gray bar.
Figure 4.Non-dose-dependent effects of WJ-MSC EVs in BPD and PH. Similar reduction in (A) right ventricular systolic pressure, (B) RV/LV+S, and (C) percentage of muscularized vessels in 2-week-old hyperoxia (HYP) exposed rats treated with IT low dose (LD), medium dose (MD) and high dose (HD) WJ-MSC EV. IT WJ-MSC EV non-dose dependently (D) increased lung vascular density, (E) decreased mean linear intercept and (F) increased radial alveolar count. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; N = 6/group. *P < .05, room air (RA) placebo (PL) vs. HYP PL or HYP PL vs. HYP WJ-MSC EV LD, MD or HD.
Figure 5.Non-dose-dependent effects of WJ-MSC EVs on lung cytokine concentration. Multiplex array demonstrate similar reduction in the lung concentration of (A) IL-1β, IL-1α, IL-6, TNF-α, MIP-1 α, MCP-1, and leptin concentration in 2-week-old hyperoxia (HYP) exposed rats treated with IT low dose (LD), medium dose (MD), and high dose (HD) WJ-MSC EV. In contrast, lung VEGF concentration was increased by all doses of WJ-MSC EV. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; N = 4–5/group. *P < .05, room air (RA) placebo (PL) vs. HYP PL or HYP PL vs. HYP WJ-MSC EV LD, MD, or HD. (B) Treatment of hyperoxia-exposed human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells with WJ-MSC EVs 10 or 20 ug/mL increased capillary tube formation and (C) this was non-dose dependent. All experiments were performed in quadruplicate. *P < .05, normoxia control vs. hyperoxia control or hyperoxia control vs. hyperoxia WJ-MSC EV 10 or 20 ng/mL.
Figure 6.IV and IT delivered WJ-MSC EVs have similar lung protective effects in BPD and PH. IT and IV WJ-MSC EVs significantly reduced (A) weight ratio of the right ventricle to left ventricle + septum (RV/LV+S). (B) Representative lung sections stained with Von Willebrand Factor (green) and α-smooth muscle actin (red) showing increased vessels and decreased muscularization in both IV and IT hyperoxia WJ-MSC EV treated groups. Original magnification 10×. (C) Similar improvement in lung vascular density and (D) percentage of muscularized vessels in both IV and IT hyperoxia WJ-MSC EV groups. (E) H&E-stained lung sections demonstrating improved alveolar structure in hyperoxia-exposed rats that received IV or IT WJ-MSC EV. Original magnification 10×. Morphometric analysis showing (F) similarly decreased mean linear intercept in IT and IV WJ-MSC EV treated hyperoxia rats. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; N = 8–16/group. *P < .05; room air placebo (PL) vs. hyperoxia PL or hyperoxia PL vs. hyperoxia IT or hyperoxia IV WJ-MSC EV. Room air: open bar; hyperoxia: gray bar.
Figure 7.Long term effects of early IT WJ-MSC EVs in BPD and PH. Reduced (A) right ventricular systolic pressure, (B) RV/LV+S, and (C) % muscularized vessels in 3 month old hyperoxia (HYP) exposed rats treated with IT WJ-MSC EV at P3. (D) Lung sections stained with Von Willebrand Factor (green) and α-smooth muscle actin (red) demonstrating improved angiogenesis and decreased vascular remodeling in hyperoxia exposed rats treated with IT WJ-MSC EV. Original magnification 10×. (E) Increased lung vascular density in IT WJ-MSC EV hyperoxia-exposed rats. (F) H&E-stained lung sections demonstrating improved alveolar structure in 3 month old hyperoxia-exposed rats who received IT WJ-MSC EV. Original magnification ×. (G) Decreased mean linear intercept in hyperoxia-exposed IT WJ-MSC EV rats. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; N = 5–7/group. *P < .05, room air (RA) vs. HYP placebo (PL) or HYP placebo (PL) vs. HYP WJ-MSC EV.