| Literature DB >> 35757584 |
Satoshi Suzuki1, Atsunori Okamura1, Hiroyuki Nagai1, Katsuomi Iwakura1.
Abstract
Background: It has been considered impossible to perform antegrade dissection and reentry (ADR) by simply puncturing with a guidewire using the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) observation without the support of the Stingray system. Case summary: A 78-year-old man suffered from effort angina pectoris due to a chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesion in the left circumflex coronary artery. A retry percutaneous coronary intervention for the CTO lesion was attempted at our hospital. The J-CTO score was 3. The first guidewire entered the subintimal space. We moved onto Stingray-ADR using the angiographic observation, but the guidewire could not be led into the true lumen. AnteOwl WR-IVUS (AO-IVUS) observation revealed a distal true lumen in which the inner lumen was maintained 5 mm beyond the CTO exit. We decided to perform the tip detection-ADR using the AO-IVUS observation. The tip detection method allowed the tip of the penetration wire to puncture the wall between the subintima and the true lumen in an exactly vertical direction, resulting in the successful creation of a reentry point. The CTO lesion was dilated with one drug-eluting stent, and normal antegrade blood flow was achieved. Discussion: Since the tip detection method enables accurate punctures, it may allow for ADR by simply puncturing using a guidewire. Due to this method being performed using the IVUS observation, it is likely more reliable than Stingray-ADR using the angiographic observation.Entities:
Keywords: Antegrade dissection and reentry; Case report; Chronic total occlusion; Coronary intervention; IVUS-based tip detection method
Year: 2022 PMID: 35757584 PMCID: PMC9214776 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytac233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J Case Rep ISSN: 2514-2119
| 6 months ago | He began to feel chest pain on exertion. |
| 3 months ago | He was diagnosed with effort angina pectoris by cardiac computed tomography. |
| Day 1 | The patient was admitted to our hospital. |
| Day 2 | The retry percutaneous coronary intervention for the chronic total occlusion in the left circumflex coronary artery was performed. |
| Day 3 | No significant increase in myocardial enzymes was observed. |
| Day 4 | He was discharged in favourable clinical course. |
| 1 month later | The chronic total occlusion in the left anterior descending coronary artery was recanalized with an additional percutaneous coronary intervention. |
| 7 months later | In outpatient follow-up, he was asymptomatic and blood pressure was 132/84 mmHg, and no change was observed in the electrocardiogram. |