| Literature DB >> 35757271 |
Jinli Cui1, Yadong Wang2, Ke Wang3.
Abstract
Mean-shift originally refers to the mean vector of the offset. The algorithm idea is to assume that the data sets of different clusters conform to different probability density distributions, and the area with high sample density corresponds to the center of the cluster. With the wide application of hospital information system, especially the popularity of the meanshift algorithm in the outpatient system, it has greatly improved the efficiency of medical staff. Medical imaging refers to the technology and process of obtaining internal tissue images of the human body or a certain part of the human body in a noninvasive manner for medical treatment or medical research. It contains the following two relatively independent research directions: medical imaging system and medical image processing. In this paper, we expect to improve the mining ability of medical image information with the help of the meanshift algorithm based on the key technology of the medical image intelligent mining algorithm. This paper proposes a method to enhance image feature extraction and data mining and how to apply relevant analysis rules for mining. Applying this integrated algorithm to extract simplified rules is more beneficial to people's understanding than the raw data and helps doctors quickly understand the patient's condition.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35757271 PMCID: PMC9217612 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6711043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Med Int ISSN: 2090-2840 Impact factor: 1.621
Figure 1Data mining model.
Figure 2Data mining process.
Comparison of the number of iterations.
| Number of frames | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of iterations meanshift algorithm | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |
| Improved algorithm | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
| Average | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | |
Evaluation of image enhancement effects.
| Indicators | Based on uniformity | Mathematical morphology | Histogram equalization |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSM | 12 | 20 | 1 |
| TBCs | 27 | 7 | 2 |
| TBCe | 29 | 6 | 1 |
Image enhancement metrics for different regions.
| Name | Average value | Variance | Smoothness | Peak state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background category | 175 | 2.158 | 0.639 | 0.254 |
| Function bundle category 1 | 141 | 13.15 | 0.852 | 0.059 |
| Function bundle 2 | 91.2 | 7.69 | 0.789 | 0.156 |
Figure 3Image enhancement algorithm.
Rough set decision-making.
| Decision table | Conditional properties | Decision attributes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| C | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| D | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Figure 4Brain MRI image data.
Image grading statistics.
| WHO level | Percent | |
|---|---|---|
| Class I | LGG | 14% |
| Class II | 42% | |
| Class III | HGG | 33% |
| Class IV | 11% | |
Figure 5K-mean clustering analysis process of MRI images.
Figure 6Cluster analysis of MRI images.
The input stream for rule mining.
| Rule | Composition | Conf (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Edge = very clear ⟶ WHO level = HGG | 2 | 100 |
| Edge = relatively clear ∧ placeholder = heavy placeholder ⟶ WHO level = HGG | 3 | 100 |
| Edge = relatively clear edema = severe edema ⟶ WHO level = HGG | 3 | 100 |
| Occupancy = mild occupation ∧ edema = mild edema ⟶ WHO level = LGG | 3 | 100 |
| Edge = fuzzy ∧ placeholder = mild place ∧ edema = severe edema ⟶ WHO level = LGG | 4 | 100 |