| Literature DB >> 35756867 |
Liqin Tang1, Yan Xing1, Hui Li1.
Abstract
Objective: To construct a case management model of synchronous radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy (CRR) for cervical cancer led by nurses and carry out preliminary implementation and evaluation, so as to explore a new model of nursing practice.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35756867 PMCID: PMC9232302 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5450575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.664
Comparison of clinical data between the two groups.
| Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 44.05 ± 6.91 | 41.35 ± 7.09 | 3.25 | 0.24 |
| BMI | 17.05 ± 1.28 | 17.65 ± 1.06 | 5.29 | 0 .28 |
| Smoking | 17 (39.5%) | 19 (51.4%) | 1.96 | 0.69 |
| Marital status | 17.83 | 0.24 | ||
| Married | 23 (53.5%) | 19 (51.4%) | ||
| Single | 6 (14%) | 9 (24.3%) | ||
| Divorced or separated | 10 (23.3%) | 6 (16.2%) | ||
| Widowed | 4 (9.3%) | 3 (8.1%) | ||
| Nation | 3.28 | 0.42 | ||
| Han nationality ( | 32 (74.4%) | 26 (70.2%) | ||
| Yi nationality ( | 10 (23.3%) | 9 (24.3%) | ||
| Zang nationality ( | 1 (2.3%) | 2 (5.4%) | ||
| Cultural status | 5.52 | 0.47 | ||
| Junior high school | 10 (23.3%) | 3 (8.1%) | ||
| High school/technical secondary school | 13 (30.2%) | 9 (24.3%) | ||
| Junior college | 13 (30.2%) | 19 (51.4%) | ||
| University and higher | 7 (16.3%) | 6 (16.2%) | ||
| Economic situation | 3.39 | 0 .35 | ||
| Good | 13 (30.2%) | 12 (32.4%) | ||
| Secondary | 22 (51.2%) | 18 (48.6%) | ||
| Poor | 8 (18.6%) | 7 (18.9%) | ||
| Postoperative lymphedema | 1.35 | 0.39 | ||
| Had | 33 (76.7%) | 26 (70.3%) | ||
| No | 10 (23.3%) | 11 (29.7%) |
Note: compared with the control group, significant difference as P < 0.05.
Comparison of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADs) between the two groups after intervention (points, ).
| Time | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anxiety | Before intervention | 10.37 ± 2.10 | 10.19 ± 2.01 | 0.52 | 0.096 |
| After intervention | 5.63 ± 2.35 | 9.09 ± 2.42 | 5.78 | <0.001 | |
|
| 24.9 | 5.78 | — | — | |
|
| <0.001 | 0.02 | — | — | |
|
| |||||
| Depression | Before intervention | 10.67 ± 2.37 | 10.31 ± 2.09 | 0.54 | 0.27 |
| After intervention | 6.31 ± 2.89 | 9.39 ± 2.32 | 6.32 | <0.001 | |
|
| 16.91 | 7.15 | — | — | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | — | — | |
Note: compared with the control group, significant difference as P < 0.05.
Figure 1Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) were used to compare the statistical differences between the anxiety significance scores of the experimental group and the control group after intervention, so as to evaluate the level of depression and anxiety of patients. Note: compared with the experimental group, ∗P < 0.05.
Comparison of nutritional status between the two groups before and after intervention (points, ).
| Time | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum fatty acids | Before intervention | 1.33 ± 0.10 | 1.19 ± 0.32 | 1.52 | 0.086 |
| After intervention | 0.63 ± 0.35 | 1.09 ± 0.42 | 5.78 | <0.001 | |
|
| 3.29 | 2.18 | — | — | |
|
| 0.042 | 0.062 | — | — | |
|
| |||||
| Serum albumin | Before intervention | 43.67 ± 4.37 | 44.32 ± 2.49 | 0.54 | 0.37 |
| After intervention | 36.32 ± 1.99 | 47.29 ± 2.12 | 16.42 | 0.0001 | |
|
| 8.91 | 7.15 | — | — | |
|
| 0.0001 | 0.321 | — | — | |
|
| |||||
| Total lymphocytes | Before intervention | 1.67 ± 0.37 | 1.42 ± 0.09 | 2.34 | 0.39 |
| After intervention | 1.01 ± 2.89 | 1.39 ± 2.32 | 1.32 | 0.056 | |
|
| 3.91 | 7.15 | — | — | |
|
| 0.053 | 0.076 | — | — | |
|
| |||||
| Serum cholesterol | Before intervention | 170.65 ± 12.37 | 178.31 ± 20.09 | 0.54 | 0.27 |
| After intervention | 106.31 ± 3.19 | 169.39 ± 2.29 | 6.32 | 0.0002 | |
|
| 14.31 | 3.15 | — | — | |
|
| 0.0003 | 0.045 | — | — | |
Note: compared with the control group, significant difference as P < 0.001.
Comparison of adverse reactions between two groups.
| Group | Nausea | Lose weight | Radiation vaginitis | Radiation dermatitis | Radiation proctitis | Radiation cystitis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 7 (16.3%) | 8 (18.6%) | 9 (20.9%) | 9 (20.9%) | 14 (32.6%) | 5 (11.6%) |
| Control group | 10 (27%) | 7 (18.9%) | 15 (40.5%) | 16 (43.2%) | 11 (29.7%) | 7 (18.9%) |
|
| 7.153 | 3.621 | 6.378 | 6.378 | 4.061 | 9.737 |
|
| 0.643 | 0.742 | 0.034 | 0.038 | 0.081 | 0.382 |
Note: compared with the control group, significant difference as P < 0.05.