Literature DB >> 35756822

Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty: Which Surgical Approach Is Optimal?

William T Sheahan1, Thomas E Sheahan1.   

Abstract

Background: For decades, the total hip arthroplasty procedure of choice has been a standard posterior approach. In the past several years, modified muscle-sparing surgical approaches have been introduced, including the mini posterior and direct anterior approaches. However, the optimal surgical approach is still being debated. Case Presentation: This case report describes a patient with right hip end-stage degenerative joint disease, a comparison of the mini posterior and direct anterior approaches, and the patient's choice of procedure. Conclusions: The final decision for total hip arthroplasty approaches should be dependent on the patient-surgeon relationship and informed decision making.
Copyright © 2022 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35756822      PMCID: PMC9217074          DOI: 10.12788/fp.0234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fed Pract        ISSN: 1078-4497


  27 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Prospective randomised trial].

Authors:  José Ramón Varela Egocheaga; Miguel Ángel Suárez-Suárez; María Fernández-Villán; Vanessa González-Sastre; José Ramón Varela-Gómez; Antonio Murcia-Mazón
Journal:  An Sist Sanit Navar       Date:  2010 May-Aug       Impact factor: 0.829

2.  What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Richard Noel de Steiger; Michelle Lorimer; Michael Solomon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the standard versus mini-incision posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  James R Berstock; Ashley W Blom; Andrew D Beswick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Revisited.

Authors:  Dimitrios A Flevas; Andreas G Tsantes; Andreas F Mavrogenis
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2020-04

5.  Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers.

Authors:  Patrick F Bergin; Jason D Doppelt; Curtis J Kephart; Michael T Benke; James H Graeter; Andrew S Holmes; Hana Haleem-Smith; Rocky S Tuan; Anthony S Unger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gregory R Galakatos
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

7.  Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Authors:  Xian-Teng Yang; Hai-Feng Huang; Li Sun; Zhen Yang; Chao-Yong Deng; Xiao-Bin Tian
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jonathan T Evans; Jonathan P Evans; Robert W Walker; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse; Adrian Sayers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A comparison of clinical, radiographic and surgical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty between direct anterior and posterior approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fangteng Jia; Bin Guo; Feixiang Xu; Yuechao Hou; Xiongfeng Tang; Lanfeng Huang
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Factors that may influence the functional outcome after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florin Păunescu; Andreea Didilescu; Dinu M Antonescu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2013-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.