Literature DB >> 35756798

Efficacy of glycine air-powder abrasion for treatment of peri-implantitis.

Keisuke Seki1,2, Takayuki Ikeda1, Atsushi Kamimoto1,2, Yoshiyuki Hagiwara1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air-powder abrasion; Dental implant; Glycine powder; Peri-implantitis

Year:  2021        PMID: 35756798      PMCID: PMC9201631          DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Sci        ISSN: 1991-7902            Impact factor:   3.719


× No keyword cloud information.
The pathogenesis of peri-implantitis, which significantly impairs oral quality of life, is not fully identified, and function can be restored by cumulative interceptive supported therapy. The rough surface structure of current implants is difficult to decontaminate following bacterial infection. Moreover, the complex thread morphology makes cleaning difficult, and nonsurgical procedures alone are ineffective and do not allow the bone tissue to heal. Various methods have been used to decontaminate implant surfaces. Among them, the Er:YAG laser does not irradiate the implant surface evenly; implantoplasty reduces the strength of the implant body and increases the risk of fracture, and the effect of titanium particle fragments on the surrounding tissue cells is unknown. The application of air-powder ablation is minimally invasive and advantageous to both the organism and the implant. In this report, we described a case of peri-implantitis treated with air-powder abrasion in which bone regeneration was achieved without bone grafting. A 47-year-old female patient visited our hospital in 2013 with a chief complaint of discomfort on the right side of the mandible. She had no systemic diseases and smoking habit. Tooth #47 had been replaced with an implant (Brånemark System® Mk Ⅳ, 11.5 mm, Nobel Biocare, Zürich, Switzerland) 2 years previously (Fig. 1A). Peri-implantitis with surrounding mucosal swelling, a probing depth of 7 mm, and bleeding was diagnosed. A porcelain-fused-to-metal crown was temporarily cemented, with no cement residue observed. After several applications of local antibiotic therapy (minocycline hydrochloride ointment), the symptoms did not improve and a surgical procedure was planned. After local anesthesia, a full-thickness flap was elevated and four-wall bone resorption was confirmed. The granulation tissue was easily removed in a single mass. No calcification was observed on the surface, and air abrasion with glycine powder (AIR-FLOW SⅠⓇ E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A., Nyon, Switzerland) was performed (Fig. 1B and C). The spray was applied at a distance of 3–5 mm from the implant surface at an angle of 30–60° to the axial plane at 0.5 MPa air pressure for 1–2 min. The handpiece was angled carefully to avoid dead space (Fig. 1D). The base of the flap was not sprayed to avoid subcutaneous emphysema. The patient had no postoperative discomfort and continued regular maintenance (Fig. 1E), and a large gain in bone tissue was observed (Fig. 1F and G).
Figure 1

The radiographic and clinical photographs of our case. (A) Panoramic radiograph at the time of earlier prosthetic rehabilitation (2011). (B) Air-powder abrasion device (AIR-FLOW SⅠⓇ E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A., Nyon, Switzerland). (C) Glycine powder – average particle size is 25–150 μm, Mohs hardness is 2 (lower than that of dentin). (D) Clinical photograph after the air abrasion for peri-implantitis (2015). (E) Clinical photograph at maintenance (2021). (F) Periapical radiograph of #47 peri-implantitis (2015) showing bone resorption of about half of the implant length. (G) Periapical radiograph showing marked bone regeneration around the #47 implant.

The radiographic and clinical photographs of our case. (A) Panoramic radiograph at the time of earlier prosthetic rehabilitation (2011). (B) Air-powder abrasion device (AIR-FLOW SⅠⓇ E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A., Nyon, Switzerland). (C) Glycine powder – average particle size is 25–150 μm, Mohs hardness is 2 (lower than that of dentin). (D) Clinical photograph after the air abrasion for peri-implantitis (2015). (E) Clinical photograph at maintenance (2021). (F) Periapical radiograph of #47 peri-implantitis (2015) showing bone resorption of about half of the implant length. (G) Periapical radiograph showing marked bone regeneration around the #47 implant. Glycine, an amino acid produced by the human body, is water-soluble and therefore generally harmless. It is more useful than chemical cleaning methods for removing biofilm from subgingival and implant surfaces, and its bone healing capacity is reported to be better than that of implantoplasty. Peri-implantitis, with various forms of bone defects, is associated with difficulties in instrument reachability and manipulation angles. However, the excellent therapeutic effect obtained in this study indicates that the treatment is sufficiently effective even on the complex TiUnite® surface structure. Air abrasion with glycine powder can achieve effective decontamination when used alone and it provides an environment that enhances bone regeneration even without bone grafting.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
  5 in total

1.  Air-abrasive debridement with glycine powder versus manual debridement and chlorhexidine administration for the maintenance of peri-implant health status: a six-month randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  S M Lupi; M Granati; A Butera; V Collesano; R Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.477

Review 2.  Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications.

Authors:  Niklaus P Lang; Tord Berglundh; Lisa J Heitz-Mayfield; Bjarni E Pjetursson; Giovanni E Salvi; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Implantoplasty Versus Glycine Air Abrasion for the Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jérôme Frédéric Lasserre; Michel Christian Brecx; Selena Toma
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

Authors:  Noel Claffey; Emily Clarke; Ioannis Polyzois; Stefan Renvert
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Efficacy of alternative or adjunctive measures to conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Andrea Schmucker; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-08-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.