| Literature DB >> 35756770 |
Yasuhiko Nara1, Hideki Kitaura1, Aseel Marahleh1, Fumitoshi Ohori1, Takahiro Noguchi1, Adya Pramusita1, Ria Kinjo1, Jinghan Ma1, Kayoko Kanou1, Itaru Mizoguchi1.
Abstract
Background/purpose: As the number of patients with osteoporosis requiring orthodontic treatment is increasing with the aging of society, it is necessary to evaluate the relations between bone metabolism in old age and orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). However, the effects of changes in bone metabolism due to osteoporosis on OTM and root resorption are still unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effects of OTM and root resorption in a mouse ovariectomy (OVX)-induced osteoporosis model. Materials and methods: Eight-week-old female wild-type mice underwent OVX or sham surgery (Sham) as controls. One month after treatment, a nickel titanium coil spring was used to apply a mesial force to the maxillary left first molars of OVX or Sham mice for 12 days. The distance between the maxillary first molar and the second molar changed due to OTM and osteoclast formation was evaluated. The odontoclast formation and root resorption along the root surface of the distobuccal root of the first molar was also evaluated by histological analysis and scanning electron microscopy.Entities:
Keywords: Bone resorption; Odontoclast; Orthodontics; Root resorption; Tooth movement
Year: 2021 PMID: 35756770 PMCID: PMC9201653 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.11.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 3.719
Figure 1OTM distance on day 12 in the maxillary left first molar area (OTM side) and right first molar area (control side) in Sham and OVX mice. (A) Intraoral photograph of the appliance fixed between anterior alveolar bone and upper left first molar. (B) The distances of tooth movement were measured using silicone impressions of the control and OTM sides in Sham and OVX mice. (C) Comparison of tooth movement between Sham and OVX mice. ∗p < 0.05. n = 4 for each group.
Figure 2Histological analysis of horizontal sections of alveolar bone in the maxillary left first molar area (OTM side) and right first molar area (control side). (A) TRAP-stained histological sections of the distobuccal root of the maxillary left first molar after 12 days of experimental tooth movement (OTM side) and maxillary right first molar (control side) in Sham and OVX mice. (B) Graph showing the numbers of TRAP-positive cells along the alveolar bone on the pressure (mesial) side in both the maxillary left first molar area (OTM side) and right first molar area (control side) after 12 days in Sham and OVX mice. Scale bars = 50 μm ∗∗p < 0.01. n = 4 for each group.
Figure 3Root resorption after OTM in Sham and OVX mice. (A) Representative scanning electron micrographs of the distobuccal root of the maxillary left first molar after 12 days in Sham and OVX mice. Arrows indicate the orientation of the image: B, buccal; P, palatal; M, mesial; D, distal. (B) Graph indicating the ratio of root resorption area in Sham and OVX mice. ∗p < 0.05. n = 4 for each group.
Figure 4Evaluation of root resorption on transverse histological sections in Sham and OVX mice. (A) TRAP-stained histological sections of the distobuccal root of the maxillary left first molar area (OTM side) and right first molar area (control side) in Sham and OVX mice. (B) The numbers of TRAP-positive cells along the root surface on the pressure (mesial) side of the maxillary left first molar area (OTM side) and right first molar area (control side) after 12 days of OTM in Sham and OVX mice. (C) Evaluation of the root resorption surface on transverse histological sections. The percentage root resorption area was calculated as the root resorption surface (broken line)/root surface (solid line) ratio. (D) Ratio of root resorption surface on histological sections of the maxillary left first molar area (OTM side) and right first molar area (control side) after 12 days of OTM in Sham and OVX mice. Scale bars = 50 μm ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. n = 4 for each group.