| Literature DB >> 35756671 |
Jun Cheng1, Jia Sun2, Yi Zhao3, Xiayu Li1, Yan Jiang1, Rong Lv1, Heng Li1, Jianghua Chen1.
Abstract
Background: A large number of studies have shown that serum globulin plays an important role in a variety of cancers; However, few studies have identified the association between serum globulin levels and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause death in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma (MM).Entities:
Keywords: All-cause deaths; Chinese Patients; Multiple Myeloma; Serum Globulin Level; renal impairment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35756671 PMCID: PMC9213688 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.850961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Baseline clinical and fifindings of the studied patients separated by tertiles of serum globulin level.
| Variable | Tertiles of serum globulin level(mg/dl) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <3.3 | >=3.3, <6.0 | >=6.0 | ||
| Low group | Middle group | High group | ||
| N | 95 | 95 | 98 | N |
| Age(year) | 60.4 ± 9.3 | 62.5 ± 9.7 | 61.5 ± 9.5 | 0.317 |
| Sex | 0.666 | |||
| Female | 40 (42.1%) | 34 (35.8%) | 39 (39.8%) | |
| Male | 55 (57.9%) | 61 (64.2%) | 59 (60.2%) | |
| Follow-up time(month) | 22.2 ± 17.9 | 22.2 ± 16.4 | 25.5 ± 19.9 | 0.333 |
| Urinary kappa light chain(mg/dl) | 436.1 ± 1061.3 | 79.6 ± 247.5 | 115.8 ± 275.7 | 0.001 |
| Urinary lambda light chain(mg/dl) | 705.3 ± 1610.5 | 151.1 ± 648.8 | 62.2 ± 207.0 | 0.001 |
| Hemoglobin(g/l) | 102.6 ± 27.9 | 101.6 ± 23.2 | 83.5 ± 19.8 | 0.001 |
| Serum albumin(g/l) | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 2.9 ± 0.6 | 0.001 |
| eGFR(ml/min) | 56.2 ± 41.8 | 82.7 ± 37.2 | 73.8 ± 28.6 | 0.001 |
| Serum kappa light chain(mg/dl) | 744.3 ± 652.2 | 1947.2 ± 1973.1 | 3980.8 ± 4281.5 | 0.001 |
| Serum lambda light chain(mg/dl) | 555.3 ± 562.7 | 1223.4 ± 1479.8 | 2307.3 ± 2978.3 | 0.001 |
| serum globulin(mg/dl) | 2.3± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 8.19 ± 1.48 | 0.001 |
| Lactate dehydrogenase(u/l) | 233.3 ± 131.9 | 180.7 ± 68.8 | 165.6 ± 78.7 | 0.001 |
| Serum beta 2 microglobulin(ug/l) | 8751.9 ± 8081.7 | 5551.9 ± 5421.1 | 7074.1 ± 6065.6 | 0.007 |
| ISS-Stage | <0.001 | |||
| I | 28 (33.3%) | 31 (34.1%) | 7 (7.2%) | |
| II-III | 56 (66.7%) | 60 (65.9%) | 90 (92.8%) | |
| Antimyeloma Therapy | 0.287 | |||
| Non-Bortezomib group | 31 (33.0%) | 40 (42.6%) | 32 (33.0%) | |
| Bortezomib group | 63 (67.0%) | 54 (57.4%) | 65 (67.0%) | |
| Renal impairment | 0.001 | |||
| No | 56 (58.9%) | 80 (84.2%) | 84 (85.7%) | |
| Yes | 39 (41.1%) | 15 (15.8%) | 14 (14.3%) | |
| ESRD | 0.001 | |||
| No | 71 (76.3%) | 90 (95.7%) | 92 (93.9%) | |
| Yes | 22 (23.7%) | 4 (4.3%) | 6 (6.1%) | |
| All-cause death | 0.007 | |||
| No | 84 (88.4%) | 94 (98.9%) | 86 (87.8%) | |
| Yes | 11 (11.6%) | 1 (1.1%) | 12 (12.2%) | |
Figure 1Flow chart of participants in the cohort. 565 patients were enrolled were enrolled in the cross-sectional study. Of these, 277 patients were excluded and 288 patients with newly diagnosed MM were followed for > 3 months were enrolled in the longitudinal study. MM, multiple myeloma.
Cross-sectional Correlation Analyses between serum globulin level and the presence of RI in different models.
| Variable | The occurrence of RI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude model (HR, 95%CI, P) | Minimally adjusted model (HR, 95%CI, P) | Fully adjusted model (HR, 95%CI, P) | |
| serum globulin(mg/dl) | 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) <0.001 | 0.8 (0.7, 0.9) <0.001 | 0.7 (0.5, 1.0) 0.034 |
| serum globulin level | |||
| L group | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| M group | 0.3 (0.1, 0.6) <0.001 | 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) <0.001 | 0.2 (0.0, 0.5) 0.002 |
| H group | 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) <0.001 | 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) <0.001 | 0.1 (0.0, 0.3) <0.001 |
Crude model adjust for: None.
Minimally adjusted model:adjust for: age; sex.
Fully adjusted model adjust for: age; sex; hypertension history; diabetes history,LDH, HB, serum albumin, serum/urinary kappa light chain, ISS-stage, serum/urinary lambda light chain and serum beta 2 microglobulin.
Figure 2Cross-sectional associations of serum globulin level with by using in a generalized additive model and smooth curve fitting. There was a negative correlation between the serum globulin level and RI (p < 0.01) after adjusting for age; sex, LDH, urinary kappa/ Lambda light chain, serum kappa/Lambda light chain, HB, ISS-stage, serum albumin, serum beta 2 microglobulin.
Threshold effect analysis of serum globulin level and the presence of RI using piece-wise linear regression.
| Model | Result [β (95%CI) P value] |
|---|---|
| Model I | |
| one-line linear regression model | 0.7 (0.5, 0.9) 0.003 |
| Model II | |
| turning point | 6.1 mg/dl |
| Group1<6.1 correlation coefficient (β1) | 0.6 (0.4, 0.8) <0.001 |
| Group2 >6.1, correlation coefficient (β1) | 0.9 (0.7, 1.3) 0.709 |
| predictive value of RI at turning point | |
| a log likelihood ratio test | 1.6 (1.1, 2.5) 0.026 |
Effect: serum globulin level; Cause: myeloma-related RI.
adjusted for age; sex; hypertension history; diabetes history LDH, ISS-stage, serum albumin, serum/urinary lambda light chain, serum/urinary kappa light chain, HB, serum beta 2 microglobulin.
Relationship between serum globulin level and All-cause death and ESRD in different models.
| Variable | All-cause death | ESRD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude model (HR, 95%CI, P) | Minimally adjusted model(HR, 95%CI, P) | Fully adjusted model(HR,95%CI,P) | Crude model (HR, 95%CI, P) | Minimally adjusted model(HR, 95%CI, P) | Fully adjusted model (HR, 95%CI, P) | |
| serum globulin level | ||||||
| M group | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Low group | 11.40 (1.47, 88.39) 0.0199 | 12.40 (1.58,97.06) 0.0165 | 9.38 (1.00, 87.70) 0.0496 | 5.76 (1.98, 16.77) 0.0013 | 6.53 (2.22, 19.19) 0.0007 | 5.38 (1.41, 20.56) 0.0140 |
| High group | 8.77 (1.13, 68.18) 0.0379 | 9.38 (1.20, 73.24) 0.0327 | 14.05 (1.36, 144.53) 0.0263 | 1.24 (0.35, 4.41) 0.7375 | 1.38 (0.39, 4.93) 0.6171 | 2.75 (0.45, 16.63) 0.2718 |
Crude model adjust for: None.
Minimally adjusted model: adjust for: age sex.; hypertension history; diabetes history.
Fully adjusted model adjust for: age; sex.; hypertension history; diabetes history, serum/urinary lambda light chain, LDH, serum/urinary kappa light chain, HB, ISS-stage, serum albumin and serum beta 2 microglobulin.
Figure 3(A) Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves of all-cause death outcome according to serum globulin levels *Survival in the M group was significantly higher than the H group and L group. (B) Adjusted Log risk ratios (RRs) for all-cause death outcome by tertiles of serum globulin levels. A U-shaped association was shown to exist between the serum globulin level and all-cause deaths in patients with MM. P < 0.05 M vs. H group; P < 0.05 M vs. L group; P > 0.01 H vs. L group.
Figure 4(A) Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves of ESRD outcome according to serum globulin levels.Renal survival was lowest In the L group, Renal survival analysis between the H and M groups was not significantly different. P > 0.01 M vs. H group; P < 0.01 M vs. L group and H vs. L group. (B) Adjusted Log risk ratios (RRs) for ESRD by tertiles of serum globulin levels. A L-shaped association was shown to exist between the serum globulin level and ESRD in patients with MM.