Literature DB >> 35756349

Allele-specific and multiplex PCR based tools for cost-effective and comprehensive genetic testing in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.

Lavanya Ravichandran1, Deny Varghese1, Parthiban R1, Asha H S1, Sophy Korula2, Nihal Thomas1,3, Aaron Chapla1,3.   

Abstract

Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) is an autosomal recessive disorder due to enzyme defects in adrenal steroidogenesis. Several genes code for these enzymes, out of which mutations in the CYP21A2 gene resulting in 21 hydroxylase deficiency, contribute to the most common form of CAH. However, pseudogene imposed challenges complicate genotyping CYP21A2 gene, and there is also a lack of comprehensive molecular investigations in other genetic forms of CAH in India. Here, we describe a cost-effective, highly specific, and sensitive Allele Specific PCR (ASPCR) assay designed and optimized in-house to screen eight common pathogenic mutations in the CYP21A2 gene. We have also established and utilized a multiplex PCR assay for target enrichment and Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of CYP11B1, CYP17A1, POR, and CYP19A1 genes. Following preliminary amplification of the functional gene CYP21A2, ASPCR based genotyping of eight common mutations - P30L, I2G, 8BPdel, I172N, E6CLUS (I235N, V236E, M238K) V281L, Q318X, and R356W was carried out. These results were further validated using Sanger and Next-generation sequencing. Once optimized to be specific and sensitive, the advantage of ASPCR in CYP21A2 genotyping extends to provide genetic screening for both adult and paediatric subjects and carrier testing at a low cost and less time. Furthermore, multiplex PCR coupled NGS has shown to be cost-effective and robust for parallel multigene sequencing in CAH.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  21 – hydroxylase deficiency; Allele Specific PCR; Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia; Multiplex PCR

Year:  2022        PMID: 35756349      PMCID: PMC9213767          DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MethodsX        ISSN: 2215-0161


Specifications table ASPCR - highly specific and sensitive to identify eight pseudogene derived mutations in the CYP21A2 gene. Multiplex PCR – cost-effective and robust for target enrichment of CAH related genes Together aids in comprehensive genetic screening for CAH in clinical settings

Description of the protocol

DNA extraction and long-range PCR

DNA extraction was carried out with 2 ml EDTA whole blood using Gentra Puregene kit from QIAGEN® (Hilden, Germany) and quantified using NanoDrop™ spectrophotometer. Long-range PCRs were utilized for locus-specific amplification of the functional gene CYP21A2 (6.2 kbp) and pseudogene CYP21A1P (6.1 kbp) with TaKaRa LA PCRTM Kit (ver.2.1) using previously published protocols [1]. In addition, the results were validated with TaqI restriction digestion [1]. Based on these results, samples suspected for large 30 kbp deletion and large gene conversion were validated with MLPA and additional long-range PCRs with specific primers for these rearrangements described previously by Greene et al [2]. Figs. 1 and 2 show results of locus-specific amplification and restriction digestion of the above genes and their interpretation in identifying rearrangements
Fig. 1

a) 1% Agarose gel image of locus-specific amplification of CYP21A2 and CYP21A1P genes. M-1 Kbp ladder, lane 1: functional gene product CYP21A2 (6.2 kbp) amplified with primers CYP779f/Tena36F and lane 2: pseudogene product CYP21A1P (6.1 kbp) amplified with primers CYP779f/ XA-36F adapted from Lee et al[1]. b) Agarose gel image (1%) - restriction digestion of CYP21A2 and CYP21A1P genes with TaqI. The product sizes of digested products from the functional gene were 3.7 kbp & 2.4 kbp shown in lane 1 and the digested products from the pseudogene were 3.2 kbp & 2.3 kbp shown in lane 2.

Fig. 2

a) Restriction digestion [1] results with TaqI in large gene conversion on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis – Lane 1 and 2 shows normal restriction digested fragments of functional and pseudogene amplified with long range PCR in the negative control. In one subject, there was no amplification with functional gene primers CYP779f/Tena36F2, and so there were no digested products as seen in lane 3. However, there was amplification with the pseudogene primers (CYP779f/ XA-36F) with a restriction digestion pattern similar to the functional gene, as shown in lane 4. This suggests a homozygous large gene conversion involving the proximal end of CYP21A2 and the distal end of CYP21A1P genes. b) Restriction digestion results in large 30 kbp deletion on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis: Lane 4 and 5 show normal restriction digested fragments of the functional and pseudogene in the negative control. Lane 1 shows a restriction digestion pattern of a sample with homozygous 30 kbp deletion. Since the deletion involves forming a chimeric (fusion) gene with the proximal end of CYP21A1P and the distal end of CYP21A2 genes, there is no amplification with pseudogene primers (CYP779f/ XA-36F). However, the product amplified with functional gene primers (CYP779f/Tena36F2) gives a restriction digestion pattern similar to that of the pseudogene. A heterozygous 30 kbp deletion on one allele results in amplification with both the primer sets, but the product from functional gene primers produces three restriction digestion bands resulting in a combination of functional and pseudogene, as seen in lane 2.

a) 1% Agarose gel image of locus-specific amplification of CYP21A2 and CYP21A1P genes. M-1 Kbp ladder, lane 1: functional gene product CYP21A2 (6.2 kbp) amplified with primers CYP779f/Tena36F and lane 2: pseudogene product CYP21A1P (6.1 kbp) amplified with primers CYP779f/ XA-36F adapted from Lee et al[1]. b) Agarose gel image (1%) - restriction digestion of CYP21A2 and CYP21A1P genes with TaqI. The product sizes of digested products from the functional gene were 3.7 kbp & 2.4 kbp shown in lane 1 and the digested products from the pseudogene were 3.2 kbp & 2.3 kbp shown in lane 2. a) Restriction digestion [1] results with TaqI in large gene conversion on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis – Lane 1 and 2 shows normal restriction digested fragments of functional and pseudogene amplified with long range PCR in the negative control. In one subject, there was no amplification with functional gene primers CYP779f/Tena36F2, and so there were no digested products as seen in lane 3. However, there was amplification with the pseudogene primers (CYP779f/ XA-36F) with a restriction digestion pattern similar to the functional gene, as shown in lane 4. This suggests a homozygous large gene conversion involving the proximal end of CYP21A2 and the distal end of CYP21A1P genes. b) Restriction digestion results in large 30 kbp deletion on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis: Lane 4 and 5 show normal restriction digested fragments of the functional and pseudogene in the negative control. Lane 1 shows a restriction digestion pattern of a sample with homozygous 30 kbp deletion. Since the deletion involves forming a chimeric (fusion) gene with the proximal end of CYP21A1P and the distal end of CYP21A2 genes, there is no amplification with pseudogene primers (CYP779f/ XA-36F). However, the product amplified with functional gene primers (CYP779f/Tena36F2) gives a restriction digestion pattern similar to that of the pseudogene. A heterozygous 30 kbp deletion on one allele results in amplification with both the primer sets, but the product from functional gene primers produces three restriction digestion bands resulting in a combination of functional and pseudogene, as seen in lane 2.

Allele Specific PCR (ASPCR) for screening eight hotspot mutations in CYP21A2 gene

The long-range PCR product of the CYP21A2 gene was utilized as a template for Allele Specific PCR (ASPCR) to genotype eight common hotspot mutations in the CYP21A2 gene. ASPCR, a modified application of conventional PCR technique, is a strategy to detect point mutations and small deletions by deliberately introducing mismatches in the primers. Primer designing is crucial in ASPCR to generate detectable amplicons from the mutation target while minimizing false priming at the non-target allele. A wild-type (WT) primer complementary to the normal sequence is designed for each target sequence harboring the hotspot mutation. A mutant (MT) primer complementary to the 3’ terminal base of the mutation under study is also designed for the same target. A reverse primer common for both the WT and MT is designed to maintain the same size for both WT and MT products. The wild type primer will provide amplification only with the wild type allele and there is no amplification when the allele is mutated. Similarly, a mutant primer can amplify only the DNA sequence that carries the mutation. This enables the identification of the hotspot mutation under simple PCR conditions. Mismatches at the penultimate bases are often intentionally added to increase the specificity of the ASPCR [3]. If the terminal destabilization is weak, a strong destabilizing mismatch is added at the penultimate base and vice versa with a strong destabilization at the terminal base. Two WT forward primers were designed for I2G splice site mutation, including two WT alleles A and C. For all the eight hotspot mutations, common internal control primers were designed in such a way, it is amplified with both WT and MT alleles.

Pre-clean up

The long-range PCR product of the CYP21A2 gene is purified using Agencourt AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, USA) magnetic beads with the following protocol. This cleaned up product is used as a template for ASPCR

Standardization of ASPCR conditions

The ASPCR was in house standardized with Emerald Amp® Max PCR master mix (Takara Bio Inc, Japan) in 15 µl reaction volume. The primer sequences are given below in table 1.
Table 1

Primer sequences for in house designed ASPCR to genotype eight common pseudogene derived mutations in CYP21A2 gene.

S.NOPRIMER NAME5' PRIMER SEQUENCE 3'
1CAH ARMS INTERNAL CONTROL FTGTGGCGGTGTAGTTGGTGTGG
2CAH ARMS INTERNAL CONTROL RGGGGACTTGTTCAGGGTGGGGA
3CAH P30L WFCTCCGGAGCCTCCACCTCCC
4CAH P30L MFCTCCGGAGCCTCCACCTCCT
5CAH P30L RTCAGTTCAGGACAAGGAGAGGCT
6CAH I2G WF [C allele]TTCCCACCCTCCAGCCCCCGC
7CAH I2G WF [A allele]TTCCCACCCTCCAGCCCCCTA
8CAH I2G MF [G allele]TTCCCACCCTCCAGCCCCCGG
9CAH I2G RTCAGTTCAGGACAAGGAGAGGCT
10CAH 8BPDEL WFCCGGACCTGTCCTTGGGAGACTAC
11CAH 8BPDEL MFTACCCGGACCTGTCCTTGGTC
12CAH 8BPDEL R*ATGCAAAAGAACCCGCCTCATAG
13CAH I172N WFCTCTCCTCACCTGCAGCATCAT
14CAH I172N MFCTCTCCTCACCTGCAGCATCAA
15CAH I172N RGAGGGTGTTTGCTGTGGTCTCA
16CAH EX 6 CLUS WFATCACATCGTGGAGATGCAGCT
17CAH EX 6 CLUS MFGAGGGATCACAACGAGGAGAA
18CAH E6 CLUS R*AGCCCCAGCCGCACAGTGCTCA
19CAH V281L WFGACAGCTCCTGGAAGGGCACG
20CAH V281L MFGACAGCTCCTGGAAGGGCACT
21CAH V281L RTCTCCCAGACCGTCTCATCCA
22CAH Q318X WFCCAGATTCAGCAGCGACTGC
23CAH Q318X MFCCAGATTCAGCAGCGACTGT
24CAH Q318X RCTCGCACCCCAGTATGACT
25CAH R356W F*CTGGAGCCACTGGTCCATCCAA
26CAH R356W WRGCTAAGAGCACAACGGGCCG
27CAH R356W MRGCTAAGAGCACAACGGGCCA
WF- Wildtype Forward, MF- Mutant Forward, F-Forward, R-Reverse, WR-Wildtype Reverse, MR-Mutant Reverse. *The underlined sequences were adapted from Lee et al. [1] Primer sequences for in house designed ASPCR to genotype eight common pseudogene derived mutations in CYP21A2 gene. Optimal annealing temperature and template concentration were utilized with appropriate positive and negative controls, and the below conditions were finalized to achieve optimal results. P30L hotspot mutation required primer redesigning to overcome false-positive results. Change in DNA extraction techniques can also affect the specificity of ASPCR and might require further standardization of the template concentration used. Details of the ASPCR reaction mix and program are mentioned in Tables 2a and 2b
Table 2a

ASPCR reaction Mix.

ContentsVolume
EmeraldAmp® Max PCR master mixForward primerReverse primerInternal forward primerInternal reverse primerTemplate*Sterile water7.5 µl1 µl1 µl1 µl1 µl1 µl2.5 µl
Total15 µl

*Template - cleaned up PCR product of CYP21A2 gene (diluted concentration: 5-8 ng/µl).

Primer concentration used: 10 pmol/µl.

Table 2b

ASPCR - Thermal cycler conditions.

Stage 1×1Initial denaturation95 °C5 minutes
Stage 2× 20Denaturation98 °C10 seconds
Annealing68 °C70 °C (for I2G only)30 seconds
Extension72 °C1 minute
Stage 3× 1Final extension72 °C5 minutes
ASPCR reaction Mix. *Template - cleaned up PCR product of CYP21A2 gene (diluted concentration: 5-8 ng/µl). Primer concentration used: 10 pmol/µl. ASPCR - Thermal cycler conditions. Following this, samples were screened for all the hotspot mutations with mutant primers, and the results were also validated with Sanger and NGS sequencing (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Gel images of ASPCR results, NGS alignments and chromatogram of Sanger sequencing results for the eight CYP21A2 hotspot mutations screened. a) Agarose gel image (2%) showing ASPCR results for P30L, I2G, 8BPDEL, I172N, E6 CLUS, V281L, Q318X, and R356W mutation screening of different samples with appropriate Positive Control (PC), Negative Control (NC) and a No Template Control (NTC - To detect reagent contamination) run with mutant primers. IC indicates internal control at 180bp, 1 to n represent samples from different subjects, M indicates 100 bp marker.  NS (Non-specific) may indicate non-specific amplification from different combinations of the allele-specific and internal control primers. However, these non-specific products did not interfere with the identification of samples positive and negative for ASPCR. Utilizing these Allele-specific PCR the positive and negative control were compared with the test samples for genotyping.  b) and c) NGS results and chromatogram of Sanger validation of the eight hotspot mutations showing the same hotspot mutation corresponding to ASPCR. The chromosome coordinates of the NGS results indicate the alignment of the reads to the CYP21A2 gene and not to the pseudogene CYP21A1P.

Gel images of ASPCR results, NGS alignments and chromatogram of Sanger sequencing results for the eight CYP21A2 hotspot mutations screened. a) Agarose gel image (2%) showing ASPCR results for P30L, I2G, 8BPDEL, I172N, E6 CLUS, V281L, Q318X, and R356W mutation screening of different samples with appropriate Positive Control (PC), Negative Control (NC) and a No Template Control (NTC - To detect reagent contamination) run with mutant primers. IC indicates internal control at 180bp, 1 to n represent samples from different subjects, M indicates 100 bp marker.  NS (Non-specific) may indicate non-specific amplification from different combinations of the allele-specific and internal control primers. However, these non-specific products did not interfere with the identification of samples positive and negative for ASPCR. Utilizing these Allele-specific PCR the positive and negative control were compared with the test samples for genotyping.  b) and c) NGS results and chromatogram of Sanger validation of the eight hotspot mutations showing the same hotspot mutation corresponding to ASPCR. The chromosome coordinates of the NGS results indicate the alignment of the reads to the CYP21A2 gene and not to the pseudogene CYP21A1P.

MLPA and ASPCR in identifying chimeric genes

Large 30 kbp deletion in 21 –hydroxylase deficiency results in the formation of chimeric genes involving the proximal end of CYP21A1P and the distal end of CYP21A2 genes. MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification) is the most common technique employed in molecular analysis of large deletions and duplications in routine clinical practice. In this study, we utilized MLPA to validate large 30 kbp deletion suspected from the results of long-range PCR and restriction digestion using SALSA MLPA CAH Probemix P050 C1 from MRC-Holland [4]. Simultaneously allele-specific PCR was also carried out. Results of some of these samples are discussed below in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

MLPA images of a) reference sample with copy number 1 for all the probes b) a sample positive for 30 kbp homozygous deletion with loss of eight probes in CYP21A2 gene. This sample was homozygous positive for all the eight common mutations screened with ASPCR, indicating the formation of classic chimera CH8 [5]. c) A sample positive for heterozygous 30 kbp deletion with a copy number of 0.5 in several CYP21A2 probes. The black arrowheads indicate the copy number of MLPA probes for Intron 2 splice site – each for wild type allele C and A to be zero with DQ of 0 and 0.09, respectively. With ASPCR, this subject was heterozygous for P30L, 8BPdel, I172N, E6CLUS and V281L and homozygous for I2G mutations. The parental screening revealed that the mother was a carrier for 30 kbp deletion and the father for the I2G splice variant. These results indicate that the subject is heterozygous for 30 kbp deletion with chimeric gene CH5 [5] on one allele and I2G splice mutation on the other allele.

MLPA images of a) reference sample with copy number 1 for all the probes b) a sample positive for 30 kbp homozygous deletion with loss of eight probes in CYP21A2 gene. This sample was homozygous positive for all the eight common mutations screened with ASPCR, indicating the formation of classic chimera CH8 [5]. c) A sample positive for heterozygous 30 kbp deletion with a copy number of 0.5 in several CYP21A2 probes. The black arrowheads indicate the copy number of MLPA probes for Intron 2 splice site – each for wild type allele C and A to be zero with DQ of 0 and 0.09, respectively. With ASPCR, this subject was heterozygous for P30L, 8BPdel, I172N, E6CLUS and V281L and homozygous for I2G mutations. The parental screening revealed that the mother was a carrier for 30 kbp deletion and the father for the I2G splice variant. These results indicate that the subject is heterozygous for 30 kbp deletion with chimeric gene CH5 [5] on one allele and I2G splice mutation on the other allele. The junction sites to classify classical and attenuated chimeras depend on the series of deleterious pseudogene mutations present in the extent of rearrangement. However, CYP21A2 probes in the utilized MLPA assay span only till exon 7 out of 10 (probe: CYP21A2-7(WT) wt F306+T). But Q318X and R356W probes are also required to identify chimeras CH3 and CH8. Therefore, the ASPCR, including these mutations, is advantageous to identify the above chimeras.

Multiplex PCR based target enrichment for NGS testing in CAH

A multiplex PCR program was designed to comprehensively screen for CYP21A2, CYP11B1, CYP17A1 and POR genes in CAH along with the CYP19A1 gene that causes aromatase deficiency mimicking CAH. The coding and splice site regions of four genes - CYP11B1, CYP17A1, POR and CYP19A1 were amplified in 28 amplicons in 6 groups. Primers for the CYP11B1 gene were adapted from white et al. [6]. The primers were pooled into six groups based on the amplicon sizes (Table 3 and 4). The multiplex PCR was carried out using QIAGEN® Multiplex PCR kit. The PCR reaction mix and the conditions are described in table 5 and 6 respectively. The concentration of primers used was 10 pmol/µl. The PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 5.). Multiplex PCR products were pooled along with the long range PCR product of CYP21A2 gene and sequencing with Ion Torrent PGM™ was performed following methods from published protocols [7]. Multiplex PCR coupled NGS sequencing achieved a uniform coverage across five genes with an average base coverage depth of 700X and with >99% of the target having 20X coverage (Table 7 and Fig. 6.).
Table 3

In house designed primer sequences for amplifying CYP17A1, POR and CYP19A1 genes.

S.NOPRIMER NAME5' PRIMER SEQUENCE 3'
1CYP17A1 EX1 FTCCAAGCCTTGACTCCTGAG
2CYP17A1 EX1 RACATGCACCTTCTCAGTCCA
3CYP17A1 EX2-3 FAAGGAAAGCAGGGACCAGAG
4CYP17A1 EX2-3 RAAAAGATGGGTCATTGCGGC
5CYP17A1 EX4 FCTCCTCCCTTGTTTAGAATTG
6CYP17A1 EX4 RCGCCCAGCCCTTAAGTCA
7CYP17A1 EX5-6 FCTGCCCAGACTTGCTCTACT
8CYP17A1 EX5-6 RAGTAGTTGATGGTTGACTGACTT
9CYP17A1 EX7-8 FAAACGCACACCCACATACAC
10CYP17A1 EX7-8RGAGCTCGAGTGTCCTGAGAA
11POR EX1 FCATTTCCTGCAGCCCCAG
12POR EX1 RTTTTCGCAGTGCTTCCTGTG
13POR EX2 FGGAATGTCCCCTCCCTGTG
14POR EX2 RCGGAGAGAAAATGGCAGTGG
15POR EX3 FGTGACCTTTGCCCTCCTTTG
16POR EX3 RGCAGGGATGGCAATGACC
17POR EX4 FGGCCTTCCCCATCTGGTG
18POR EX4 RGTCCACTGCCAGCCTCAA
19POR EX5-6 FGTCAACCAGATGAAGCCTCT
20POR EX5-6 RCTTCTAACCTTGCTGCGACC
21POR EX7 FTAGTCCAACCCCTCCCTCTC
22POR EX7 RTGCAGAGTAAGGTGGCTAAGT
23POR EX8-9 FGCCCTTGATGTAACCGGTGAGA
24POR EX8-9 RGCCTAAGCAGAAGCTCAACC
25POR EX10-11 FCCAGGGAGGCATCAGAGAG
26POR EX10-11 RGAGAATCTCACAAGCCAGCC
27POR EX12-13 FCTGCAGAACGGGACTTGG
28POR EX12-13 RAAGGGTGGTGCTGTGAGG
29POR EX14-15 FACGAAGGTGGGCATGAGG
30POR EX14-15 RAAGTTGATGCAGGTGGAGGT
31CYP19A1 EX 1FCTTTGCCCTCCTTTCATCCAC
32CYP19A1 EX 1RTGCGACCAAATGTAGGGGAT
33CYP19A1 EX 2FGTCTTGCCTAAATGTCTGATCACA
34CYP19A1 EX 2RTTTCTCCCAAGTCCTCATTTGC
35CYP19A1 EX 3FATGGAGAAGTGAAGAGCCTCAT
36CYP19A1 EX 3RTCAAGCAAAACCCAATTATTCTGTT
37CYP19A1 EX 4FACAGAAGTGCTTATTCAACCCG
38CYP19A1 EX 4RCAAGGTCGTGAGCCAAGGTC
39CYP19A1 EX 5FCCTATCTCCTTCCGTTCATTCATT
40CYP19A1 EX 5RGCTGGCCCCTACTTTATGGAA
41CYP19A1 EX 6FTGGATGGCAAGGAGAACAAATC
42CYP19A1 EX 6RTCGACCCTTCTCTTCAACTCAA
43CYP19A1 EX 7FAGCTAACTCTGGCACCTTAACA
44CYP19A1 EX 7RGTGGGCTATTTGGATTGGGATT
45CYP19A1 EX 8FGTCCACAGTCAATCACAGAGAC
46CYP19A1 EX 8RAGAGGAGAGCGGAAAGGATTG
47CYP19A1 EX 9FGCATAACATATTTGGCCCTGGT
48CYP19A1 EX 9RGAAGGCTTGAGGATGAATACGG
49CYP19A1 EX 10FACATAGAAAGGGCTTGAGTTCC
50CYP19A1 EX 10RCCTTGGGTTGAGGCAGTAGA
51CYP11B1 EX1-2F*TCGAAGGCAAGGCACCAG
52CYP11B1 EX1-2R*TGCTCCCAGCTCTCAGCT
53CYP11B1 EX 3-5F*AGAAAATCCCTCCCCCCTA
54CYP11B1 EX3-5R*GACACGTGGGCGCCGTGTGA
55CYP11B1 EX 6-9F*TGACCCTGCAGCTGTGTCT
56CYP11B1 EX6-9R*GAGACGTGATTAGTTGATGGC

Primers for the CYP11B1 gene were adapted from white et al.[6].

Table 4

Grouping details of primers for multiplex PCR.

Group No.Product Size (bp)volume (µl)
GROUP 1
1POR EX7 F38710
POR EX7 R10
2POR EX3 F48510
POR EX3 R10
3POR EX1 F54510
POR EX1 R10
4CYP19A1 EX 9F58910
CYP19A1 EX 9R10
1X TE70
TOTAL150
GROUP 2
1CYP19A1 EX 4F47015
CYP19A1 EX 4R15
2CYP19A1 EX 1F50610
CYP19A1 EX 1R10
3POR EX4 F58110
POR EX4 R10
4CYP19A1 EX 6F62710
CYP19A1 EX 6R10
5CYP19A1 EX 10F77810
CYP19A1 EX 10R10
6CYP11B1 EX1-2F87410
CYP11B1 EX1-2R10
7CYP17A1 EX7-8 F144810
CYP17A1 EX7-8R10
1X TE50
TOTAL200
GROUP 3
1CYP19A1 EX 7F46810
CYP19A1 EX 7R10
2CYP19A1 EX 3F53410
CYP19A1 EX 3R10
3CYP19A1 EX 5F60010
CYP19A1 EX 5R10
4POR EX10-11 F76810
POR EX10-11 R10
5POR EX5-6 F85010
POR EX5-6 R10
6CYP11B1 EX 3-5F140910
CYP11B1 EX3-5R10
1X TE80
TOTAL200
GROUP 4
1CYP19A1 EX 2F47110
CYP19A1 EX 2R10
2POR EX2 F52710
POR EX2 R10
3CYP19A1 EX 8F58510
CYP19A1 EX 8R10
4POR EX12-13 F64920
POR EX12-13 R20
5CYP17A1 EX2-3 F79510
CYP17A1 EX2-3 R10
6CYP17A1 EX5-6 F95010
CYP17A1 EX5-6 R10
7CYP11B1 EX 6-9F154110
CYP11B1 EX6-9R10
1X TE40
TOTAL200
GROUP 5
1CYP17A1 EX4 F4432
CYP17A1 EX4 R2
2POR EX14-15 F8183
POR EX14-15 R3
TOTAL10
GROUP 6
1POR EX8-9 F5661
POR EX8-9 R1
2CYP17A1 EX1 F9721
CYP17A1 EX1 R1
1X TE6
TOTAL10
Table 5

Multiplex PCR reaction mix.

ContentsVolume
2x QIAGEN Multiplex PCR Master MixQ solutionDNAPrimer poolSterile water7.5 µl1.5 µl1 µl3 µl2 µl
Total15 µl

Primer concentration used: 10 pmol/µl.

Table 6

Multiplex PCR program.

Stage 1× 1Initial denaturation95 °C10 minutes
98 °C5 minutes
Stage 2× 25Denaturation98 °C30 seconds
Annealing60 °C90 seconds
Extension72 °C90 seconds
Stage 3× 1Final extension72 °C10 minutes
Fig. 5

Agarose gel image (2%) of multiplex PCRs to amplify CYP11B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1 and POR genes in 6 groups with 28 amplicons in three representative samples (A1-6, B1-6 and C1-6) respectively. 1-6 in each sample indicate amplicons amplified with the primer pool groups from 1 to 6 mentioned in Table 4

Table 7

Target coverage summary generated from Ion torrent coverage analysis plugin for CAH - 5 gene panel with 29 amplicons. The coverage of amplicons 17&18 and 19&20 are merged.

Amplicon NoContig_startContig_endRegion IDave_base readsfwd_base readsrev_base readsCov 20xCov 100xCov 500x
1104590181104591627chr10:104590181-104591627517.91441520033422214471420824
2104596499104597469chr10:104596499-1045974691166.65605352527465971971960
3104592145104593093chr10:104592145-1045930931713.268952225673666949949949
4104594438104595231chr10:104594438-1045952312463.586980654975433794794794
5104593641104594084chr10:104593641-1045940843555.056879897698548442442442
65152887651529408chr15:51528876-515294082727.535895187558589533533533
75151043751511062chr15:51510437-515110622763.9126570541073155626626626
85150264651503422chr15:51502646-515034222783.3691274280888398777777777
95151434651514944chr15:51514346-515149443165.8518373331059012599599599
105150698451507567chr15:51506984-515075673259.106964143939175584584584
115163054851631052chr15:51630548-516310523544.501918710871263505505505
125150433351504920chr15:51504333-515049203768.37411915521024252588588588
135151981651520284chr15:51519816-515202844440.9811244142838678469469469
145150775451508220chr15:51507754-515082204909.90611226811170245467467467
155153481351535282chr15:51534813-515352826990.32317146671570785470470470
163200539832011605chr6:32005398-32011605808.09825377252478950620862084977
17 &187561482175615956chr7:75614821-75615468&chr7:75615407-75615956591.2728555638612711361136872
19&207560952875611028chr7:75609528-75610224&chr7:75610180-756110281317.141985186991842143114311339
217561394075614706chr7:75613940-756147061485.86613624526031767767767
227558319775583740chr7:75583197-755837401953.465603651459034544544544
237561270075613264chr7:75612700-756132642065.257641878524992565565565
247560160675602131chr7:75601606-756021313238.409886363817040526526526
257560857375609056chr7:75608573-756090563296.955830463765263484484484
267561147275611857chr7:75611472-756118573574.839689546690342386386386
27143957567143958974chr8:143957567-143958974391.87229146626029014081360233
28143955781143957320chr8:143955781-1439573201041.747699797904493154015401509
29143960421143961293chr8:143960421-1439612931608.318725207678855873873873
Fig. 6

a. Coverage analysis report of a representative sample sequenced for CYP21A2 gene with 100% of the target having a minimum coverage of 20X reads. b. Coverage analysis report of a representative sample sequenced for five genes CAH panel in 29 amplicons with 99.72% of the target having a minimum coverage of 20X reads and 99.44% of the target with 100X reads.

In house designed primer sequences for amplifying CYP17A1, POR and CYP19A1 genes. Primers for the CYP11B1 gene were adapted from white et al.[6]. Grouping details of primers for multiplex PCR. Multiplex PCR reaction mix. Primer concentration used: 10 pmol/µl. Multiplex PCR program. Agarose gel image (2%) of multiplex PCRs to amplify CYP11B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1 and POR genes in 6 groups with 28 amplicons in three representative samples (A1-6, B1-6 and C1-6) respectively. 1-6 in each sample indicate amplicons amplified with the primer pool groups from 1 to 6 mentioned in Table 4 Target coverage summary generated from Ion torrent coverage analysis plugin for CAH - 5 gene panel with 29 amplicons. The coverage of amplicons 17&18 and 19&20 are merged. a. Coverage analysis report of a representative sample sequenced for CYP21A2 gene with 100% of the target having a minimum coverage of 20X reads. b. Coverage analysis report of a representative sample sequenced for five genes CAH panel in 29 amplicons with 99.72% of the target having a minimum coverage of 20X reads and 99.44% of the target with 100X reads. With the above comprehensive strategy, clinically significant variants were identified in CYP21A2, CYP11B1 and CYP19A1 genes in 97.2% of the study subjects (n=72) suspected for 21 hydroxylase and 11 beta hydroxylase deficiency. No disease-causing variants were identified in CYP17A1 and POR genes. However, several polymorphisms were identified in the above two genes (table 8) indicating effective use of this CAH - NGS panel in clinical settings.
Table 8

List of polymorphisms identified in CYP17A1 and POR genes through NGS strategy.

Subject IDGeneRef BaseCalled BaseCodon changeProtein changeGenotypeEffectdbSNP IDMAF in South Asians
C3CYP17A1GAc.138C>Tp.His46=HomozygousSynonymous61620.476
CA|Cc.195G>Tp.Ser65=HeterozygousSynonymous61630.359
PORGA|Gc.1716G>Ap.Ser572=HeterozygousSynonymous10578700.278
AG|Ac.387A>Gp.Pro129=HeterozygousSynonymous11356120.206
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C30CYP17A1GAc.138C>Tp.His46=HomozygousSynonymous61620.476
CA|Cc.195G>Tp.Ser65=HeterozygousSynonymous61630.359
PORCT|Cc.1508C>Tp.Ala503ValHeterozygousNon-synonymous10578680.354
TC|Tc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HeterozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C31CYP17A1GA|Gc.138C>Tp.His46=HeterozygousSynonymous61620.476
PORCT|Cc.1508C>Tp.Ala503ValHeterozygousNon-synonymous10578680.354
AG|Ac.387A>Gp.Pro129=HeterozygousSynonymous11356120.206
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C32CYP17A1GA|Gc.138C>Tp.His46=HeterozygousSynonymous61620.476
PORGA|Gc.1716G>Ap.Ser572=HeterozygousSynonymous10578700.278
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C46CYP17A1GAc.138C>Tp.His46=HomozygousSynonymous61620.476
CA|Cc.195G>Tp.Ser65=HeterozygousSynonymous61630.359
PORTCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C47PORGAc.1716G>Ap.Ser572=HomozygousSynonymous10578700.278
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C50CYP17A1GA|Gc.138C>Tp.His46=HeterozygousSynonymous61620.476
CA|Cc.195G>Tp.Ser65=HeterozygousSynonymous61630.359
PORGA|Gc.1716G>Ap.Ser572=HeterozygousSynonymous10578700.278
AG|Ac.387A>Gp.Pro129=HeterozygousSynonymous11356120.206
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C51PORGA|Gc.1716G>Ap.Ser572=HeterozygousSynonymous10578700.278
AG|Ac.387A>Gp.Pro129=HeterozygousSynonymous11356120.206
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C52CYP17A1GAc.138C>Tp.His46=HomozygousSynonymous61620.476
CAc.195G>Tp.Ser65=HomozygousSynonymous61630.359
PORCTc.1508C>Tp.Ala503ValHomozygousNon-synonymous10578680.354
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C53CYP17A1GAc.138C>Tp.His46=HeterozygousSynonymous61620.476
CAc.195G>Tp.Ser65=HeterozygousSynonymous61630.359
PORAGc.387A>Gp.Pro129=HomozygousSynonymous11356120.206
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C54PORTCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C55CYP17A1GAc.138C>Tp.His46=HomozygousSynonymous61620.476
CA|Cc.195G>Tp.Ser65=HeterozygousSynonymous61630.359
PORTCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HomozygousSynonymous22281040.932
C56CYP17A1GAc.138C>Tp.His46=HomozygousSynonymous61620.476
PORCTc.1508C>Tp.Ala503ValHeterozygousNon-synonymous10578680.354
TCc.1455T>Cp.Ala485=HeterozygousSynonymous22281040.932
List of polymorphisms identified in CYP17A1 and POR genes through NGS strategy.

Conclusion

The ASPCR assay was found to be highly specific and sensitive to detect all eight hotspot mutations in CYP21A2 gene that were also identified by NGS and Sanger sequencing, validating its sensitivity and specificity. This assay is a simple cost-effective technique to genotype point mutations in CYP21A2 gene and to identify junction sites in chimeric genes of CYP21A2 - CYP21A1P rearrangement that contributes to more than 90% of mutations in 21 – hydroxylase deficiency. Careful standardization enabled accurate and precise results that can provide a genetic diagnosis to a significant proportion of the CAH cohort in a clinical setting. The multiplex PCR assay enables a cost-effective step in NGS processing of CAH genes achieving uniform coverage matrices across the genes.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Subject Area;Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
More specific subject area;Genotyping with Allele Specific PCR and target enrichment with multiplex PCR
Protocol name;Allele Specific and Multiplex PCR for genetic testing in CAH
Reagents/tools;Gentra Puregene DNA extraction kit from QIAGEN®TaKaRa LA PCRTM Kit (ver.2.1)EmeraldAmp® Max PCR master mixQIAGEN® Multiplex PCR Kit
Experimental design;1. Long-range PCR for CYP21A2 gene amplification followed by Allele Specific PCR for screening eight hotspot mutations.2.Multiplex PCR for target enrichment of CYP11B1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1and POR genes
Trial registration;N/A
Ethics;N/A
Value of the Protocol;

ASPCR - highly specific and sensitive to identify eight pseudogene derived mutations in the CYP21A2 gene.

Multiplex PCR – cost-effective and robust for target enrichment of CAH related genes

Together aids in comprehensive genetic screening for CAH in clinical settings

  7 in total

1.  Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Jan P Schouten; Cathal J McElgunn; Raymond Waaijer; Danny Zwijnenburg; Filip Diepvens; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS) analysis of point mutations.

Authors:  S Little
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05

3.  Maturity onset diabetes of the young in India - a distinctive mutation pattern identified through targeted next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Aaron Chapla; Mahesh Doddabelavangala Mruthyunjaya; Hesarghatta Shyamasunder Asha; Denny Varghese; Manika Varshney; Senthil K Vasan; Padmanaban Venkatesan; Veena Nair; Sarah Mathai; Thomas Vizhalil Paul; Nihal Thomas
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  A mutation in CYP11B1 (Arg-448----His) associated with steroid 11 beta-hydroxylase deficiency in Jews of Moroccan origin.

Authors:  P C White; J Dupont; M I New; E Leiberman; Z Hochberg; A Rösler
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Mutational analysis of CYP21A2 gene and CYP21A1P pseudogene: long-range PCR on genomic DNA.

Authors:  Hsien-Hsiung Lee
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

6.  Novel method to characterize CYP21A2 in Florida patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and commercially available cell lines.

Authors:  Christopher N Greene; Suzanne K Cordovado; Daniel P Turner; Lisa M Keong; Dorothy Shulman; Patricia W Mueller
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2014-08-08

Review 7.  Genetics of congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Nils Krone; Wiebke Arlt
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.690

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.