| Literature DB >> 35756285 |
Dongjun Zhang1, Shamim Akhter2, Tribhuwan Kumar3, Nhat Tan Nguyen4.
Abstract
Music education is frequently growing around the globe and needs emotional attachments and adoption innovation for the attractive music education that needs researcher's emphasis. Thus, the current article investigates the impact of lack of emotional experience and resistance to innovation on unattractive music education in China. The current research also investigates the mediating impact of dissatisfied musicians among the association of lack of emotional experience, resistance to innovation, and unattractive music education in China. The study has used the primary data collected using questionnaires. The current article examines the validity and reliability using the measurement assessment model and also tests the hypotheses using the structural assessment model with the help of smart-PLS. The results indicated that the lack of emotional experience and resistance to innovation has a positive and significant impact on unattractive music education in China. The findings also revealed that dissatisfied musicians significantly mediate among lack of emotional experience, resistance to innovation, and unattractive music education in China. This article helps policymakers establish policies about making music education attractive for musicians by adopting innovation.Entities:
Keywords: China; dissatisfied musicians; lack of emotional experience; resistance to innovation; unattractive music education
Year: 2022 PMID: 35756285 PMCID: PMC9226546 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Research model.
Lack emotional experience scale.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| LEE1 | “I am not satisfied with this institution.” |
|
| LEE2 | “I do not recommend to anyone to join this institution.” | |
| LEE3 | “Institution not proved the said facilities to the students.” | |
| LEE4 | “The lack of experienced faculty in the institution.” | |
| LEE5 | “I am not interested in my education due to my institution.” | |
| LEE6 | “I feel uncomfortable during the study in my institution.” |
Resistance to innovation items.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RTI1 | “I will wait to adopt new technology until it proves beneficial.” |
|
| RTI2 | “I need to clarify some queries and justify the reasons to adopt new technology.” | |
| RTI3 | “I am waiting for the right time and required capability to adopt new technology.” | |
| RTI4 | “I fear wasting my time using new technology.” | |
| RTI5 | “I need to get a solution for some of my complaints and objections before I adopt new technology.” | |
| RTI6 | “I fear certain changes in the organization may impose on me.” | |
| RTI7 | “Innovation is not for me.” | |
| RTI8 | “It is unlikely that I will adopt innovation in future.” |
Dissatisfied musician scale.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| DSM1 | “I am not satisfied with the quality of service provided by my institution.” |
|
| DSM2 | “I am not satisfied with the collection provided by the institution.” | |
| DSM3 | “I am not satisfied with the facilities provided by the institution.” | |
| DSM4 | “I am not satisfied with the environment provided by the institution.” | |
| DSM5 | “I will not recommend my friends to make full use of this institution.” | |
| DSM6 | “I will continue using this institution.” | |
| DSM7 | “In general, I am not satisfied with this institution.” |
Music unattractive education scale.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| MUE1 | “I am not engaged with the education provided by the institution.” |
|
| MUE2 | “I am not satisfied with the education provided by my institution.” | |
| MUE3 | “I am not interested in the education provided by the institution.” | |
| MUE4 | “I am not motivated to gain this education in the same institution.” | |
| MUE5 | “The education is unattractive for me that I gain from this institution.” |
Convergent validity.
| Constructs | Items | Loadings | Alpha | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissatisfied Musicians | DSM1 | 0.821 | 0.894 | 0.919 | 0.653 |
| DSM3 | 0.783 | ||||
| DSM4 | 0.868 | ||||
| DSM5 | 0.836 | ||||
| DSM6 | 0.779 | ||||
| DSM7 | 0.758 | ||||
| Lack of Emotional Experience | LEE1 | 0.909 | 0.971 | 0.976 | 0.873 |
| LEE2 | 0.962 | ||||
| LEE3 | 0.903 | ||||
| LEE4 | 0.952 | ||||
| LEE5 | 0.920 | ||||
| LEE6 | 0.959 | ||||
| Music Unattractive Education | MUE1 | 0.776 | 0.902 | 0.927 | 0.719 |
| MUE2 | 0.884 | ||||
| MUE3 | 0.834 | ||||
| MUE4 | 0.880 | ||||
| MUE5 | 0.862 | ||||
| Resistance to Innovation | RTI1 | 0.820 | 0.930 | 0.943 | 0.677 |
| RTI2 | 0.592 | ||||
| RTI3 | 0.860 | ||||
| RTI4 | 0.854 | ||||
| RTI5 | 0.828 | ||||
| RTI6 | 0.872 | ||||
| RTI7 | 0.864 | ||||
| RTI8 | 0.855 |
Discriminant validity.
| DSM | LEE | MUE | RTI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSM | ||||
| LEE | 0.494 | |||
| MUE | 0.481 | 0.416 | ||
| RTI | 0.490 | 0.447 | 0.426 |
Path analysis.
| Relationships | Beta |
| T-statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSM→MUE | 0.268 | 0.073 | 3.647 | 0.000 |
| LEE→DSM | 0.334 | 0.070 | 4.768 | 0.000 |
| LEE→MUE | 0.186 | 0.073 | 2.552 | 0.006 |
| RTI→DSM | 0.308 | 0.074 | 4.157 | 0.000 |
| RTI→MUE | 0.192 | 0.070 | 2.752 | 0.004 |
| RTI→DSM→MUE | 0.082 | 0.032 | 2.544 | 0.006 |
| LEE→DSM→MUE | 0.089 | 0.032 | 2.827 | 0.003 |
Figure 2Measurement model assessment.
Figure 3Structural model assessment.