| Literature DB >> 35755831 |
Qiang Sun1, Zixuan Li1, Panpan Wang1, Junfang Zhao1, Shuai Chen1, Minglei Sun1.
Abstract
The combination of maxillofacial infections (MI) with descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a complex disease characterized by rapid development and high mortality. Here, we performed metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) using samples from 21 patients with MI and eight patients with DNM. In this study, we found that the species richness of the DNM group was higher than that of the MI group, and the species diversity of the DNM group was higher than that of the MI group, with no statistically significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). LefSE analysis revealed that the main species differing between groups were Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Streptococcaceae, and Streptococcus (S. constellatus and S. anginosus). In addition, the PLS-DA analysis revealed that the dominant groups in the DNM group at the species level were S. constellatus, S. anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, Prevotella oris, Mogibacterium timidum, and Eubacterium nodatum. Next, we correlated the clinical characteristics of the patients with the relative abundance of the pathogens identified in the LefSe and PLS-DA analyses. The relative abundance of S. anginosus was positively correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) and calcitoninogen (PCT) but negatively correlated with the percentage of lymphocytes (Lymph%) (P < 0.05). On the other hand, M. timidum was positively correlated with the percentage of neutrophils (Neut%) and glycated hemoglobin (GLU) (P < 0.05), and Parvimonas micra was positively correlated with CRP (P < 0.05).Entities:
Keywords: early diagnosis and treatment; mNGS; maxillofacial infection; mediastinal infection; pathogenic bacteria
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755831 PMCID: PMC9215328 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.873161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Clinical information of the two sample groups.
| Factors | MI (n = 21) | DNM (n = 8) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.27 | ||
| Male | 12 | 7 | |
| Female | 9 | 1 | |
|
| 56.67 ± 16.30 | 48.75 ± 11.89 | 0.28 |
|
| 0.21 | ||
| Yes | 6 | 5 | |
| No | 15 | 3 | |
|
| 0.13 | ||
| Yes | 3 | 4 | |
| No | 18 | 4 | |
|
| 0.79 | ||
| Yes | 10 | 4 | |
| No | 11 | 4 | |
|
| 16.45 ± 5.16 | 17.20 ± 7.22 | 0.94 |
|
| 227.53 ± 111.04 | 182.00 ± 85.86 | 0.46 |
|
| 85.61 ± 8.74 | 88.13 ± 7.54 | 0.55 |
|
| 6.82 ± 4.88 | 4.23 ± 2.66 | 0.18 |
|
| 5.52 ± 2.60 | 6.85 ± 7.35 | 0.49 |
|
| 173.74 ± 103.74 | 212.01 ± 86.75 | 0.46 |
|
| 8.89 ± 20.99 | 10.32 ± 12.43 | 0.15 |
|
| 8.65 ± 5.89 | 11.06 ± 8.84 | 0.39 |
WBC, White blood cell; PLT, blood platelet count; Neut%, percentage of neutrophilic granulocyte; Lymph%, Percentage of lymphocytes; Mono%, Percentage of Monocyte; CRP, C-reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; GLU, Glycated hemoglobin.
Figure 1Data quality control sketch. (A) raw data Q30 scale statistics, (B) total reads, (C) filter reads, (D) microbe reads.
Top 10 species detected in DNM group.
| Species | Relative abundance (%) | Gram stain | Tolerance to oxygen |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 21.04 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 10.14 | G+ | Aerobic |
|
| 6.35 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 5.81 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 5.62 | G+ | Part-time anaerobic |
|
| 5.02 | G+ | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.67 | G+ | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.43 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.23 | G+ | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.15 | G+ | Aerobic |
Top 10 species detected in MI group.
| Species | Relative abundance (%) | Gram stain | Tolerance to oxygen |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18.59 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 8.41 | G+ | Anaerobic |
|
| 6.36 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 5.67 | G+ | Aerobic |
|
| 5.02 | G+ | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.76 | G+ | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.56 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.52 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 4.03 | G- | Anaerobic |
|
| 3.12 | G- | Anaerobic |
Figure 2Alpha diversity analysis. (A) chao1 index, (B) Shannon index.
Figure 3LefSE results.
Figure 4sPLS-DA model for comparison of two groups. (A) family level, (B) genus level, (C) species level.
Figure 5Differential species screened in the sPLS-DA model. (A) species-level comp1 axial differential species, (B) 9 pathogenic species with high relative abundance in the differential species.
Figure 6Correlation of members of selected species with covariates. Spearman’s rho was calculated between selected species’ relative abundance and phenotypic scores. Black stars within heatmap boxes indicate significant results (*p < 0.05, corr.test function in psych package of R).