| Literature DB >> 35755704 |
Yuxin Yang1,2, Ying Li1,2, Xinyue Mei1,2,3, Min Yang1,2,3, Huichuan Huang1,2,3, Fei Du1,2,3, Jiaqing Wu1,2, Yiyi He1,2, Junwei Sun1,2, Haining Wang1,2,3, Xiahong He1,2,3, Shusheng Zhu1,2,3, Yingbin Li1,2,3, Yixiang Liu1,2,3.
Abstract
The interactions between non-host roots and pathogens may be key to the inhibition of soilborne pathogens in intercropping systems. Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) can be intercropped with a wide range of other plants to inhibit soilborne pathogens in biodiversity cultivation. However, the key compounds of fennel root exudates involved in the interactions between fennel roots and pathogens are still unknown. Here, a greenhouse experiment confirmed that intercropping with fennel suppressed pepper (Capsicum annuum) blight disease caused by Phytophthora capsici. Experimentally, the roots and root exudates of fennel can effectively interfere with the infection process of P. capsici at rhizosphere soil concentrations by attracting zoospores and inhibiting the motility of the zoospores and germination of the cystospores. Five terpene compounds (D-limonene, estragole, anethole, gamma-terpenes, and beta-myrcene) that were identified in the fennel rhizosphere soil and root exudates were found to interfere with P. capsica infection. D-limonene was associated with positive chemotaxis with zoospores, and a mixture of the five terpene compounds showed a strong synergistic effect on the infection process of P. capsici, especially for zoospore rupture. Furthermore, the five terpene compounds can induce the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), especially anethole, in hyphae. ROS accumulation may be one of the antimicrobial mechanisms of terpene compounds. Above all, we proposed that terpene compounds secreted from fennel root play a key role in Phytophthora disease suppression in this intercropping system.Entities:
Keywords: Phytophthora capsici; intercropping; reactive oxygen species; synergistic antimicrobial ability; terpene compounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755704 PMCID: PMC9218821 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.890534
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1Pepper and fennel intercropping patterns and their effects on pepper Phytophthora blight control in the field. (A) Pepper and fennel intercropping; (B) pepper/blank intercropping; (C) pepper monoculture; (D) disease incidence of Phytophthora pepper blight in monoculture systems, intercropping systems and the intercropping spacing without fennel rows. IB and MB indicate the borderlines (indicator line) in the intercropping and monoculture fields, respectively. IC and MC indicate the centerlines (inoculate online) in the intercropping and monoculture fields, respectively. Significant differences are based on Chi square test (p < 0.05). The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means (n = 3). The significant differences were compared between monoculture (P2), intercropping with fennel (P2/F2), and peppers spaced as in intercropping but without fennel (P2/F2-). *Indicate p < 0.05, respectively.
FIGURE 2Effects of fennel roots on zoospore behavior of P. capsici. (A,B) Dynamic process of P. capsica zoospore attraction by fennel roots. (C) Cystospore germination. (D) Chemotaxis ratios (CR): fennel root showed significant attraction to zoospores. (E) Germination rate and motility rate in fennel root and zoospore interactions. CK was a capillary tube replacing the root as the control. Significant differences were based on Chi square test (p < 0.05). The error bars indicate the standard error of the means (n = 3). *Indicates significant differences between the control and plant root treatment at the 0.05 level.
FIGURE 3Effects of fennel root exudates on zoospores at different stages. (A) Chemotaxis. (B) Motility. (C) Cystospore germination. Significant differences are based on one-way ANOVA. The error bars indicate the standard error of the means (n = 3). Lower case letters show significant differences in the inhibitory effect at different stages at the 0.05 level.
FIGURE 4Separation and characterization of terpene compounds from fennel root volatiles and fennel rhizosphere soil by gas chromatography (GC) mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. (A) GC–MS profiles of root volatiles, (B) GC–MS profiles of rhizosphere soil, and (C) GC–MS profiles of the control soil.
Quantitative analysis of terpenes in rhizosphere soil.
| Analyte | Retention time (RT) (min) | Molecular weight | Calibration curve | R2 | Actual concentration (μg/g) |
| Beta-Myrcene | 12.33 | 136.23 | y = 313474x – 1E + 06 | 0.9958 | 6.13 ± 0.70 |
| 14.02 | 136.23 | y = 82102x + 648887 | 0.9973 | 67.48 ± 12.99 | |
| gamma-Terpinene | 15.26 | 136.23 | y = 27272x + 26867 | 0.9992 | 66.30 ± 0.96 |
| Estragole | 20.43 | 148.2 | y = 425864x – 4E + 06 | 0.9989 | 13.54 ± 0.71 |
| Anethole | 23.22 | 148.2 | y = 217035x – 86524 | 0.9941 | 18.30 ± 3.38 |
Control, soil without plant culture. The error bar indicates the standard errors of the means (n = 3).
FIGURE 5(A–E) Chemotaxis of terpene compounds on zoospores. (F–J) Inhibition of terpene compounds on zoospore motility of P. capsici. (K–O) Inhibition of terpene compounds on cystospore germination. (P–T) Inhibition of terpene compounds on hyphal growth. Significant differences are based on one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means (n = 3).
The antimicrobial activity of a mixture of five terpene compounds against Phytophthora capsici infection according to their concentrations in the rhizosphere soil of fennel.
| Inhibition ratio (%) | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Concentration | Compound | Chemotaxis | Zoospore motility | Cystospore germination | Hyphal growth | Ratio of zoospore rupture (%) |
| × 1 | 0.71 ± 0.12a | 45.86 ± 1.23b | 21.85 ± 9.22c | 27.22 ± 4.12a | 4.67 ± 1.62b | |
| Estragole | 0.85 ± 0.08a | 36.79 ± 3.50c | 28.51 ± 1.72b | 30.32 ± 5.90a | 4.89 ± 2.00b | |
| Anethole | 0.57 ± 0.14a | 41.69 ± 1.63b | 41.14 ± 8.49ab | 49.18 ± 9.73a | 7.92 ± 1.28b | |
| gamma-Terpinene | 0.95 ± 0.47a | 44.42 ± 1.80b | 28.01 ± 14.36ab | 56.91 ± 5.14a | 0.58 ± 0.66b | |
| beta-Myrcene | 1.01 ± 0.40a | 34.1 ± 2.18b | 18.85 ± 2.06c | 34.97 ± 12.05a | 3.97 ± 1.16b | |
| 1 × MTC | 1.00 ± 0.35a | 100 ± 0a | 64.88 ± 9.41a | 51.73 ± 1.11a | 89.43 ± 1.32a | |
| × 2 (2 times) | 1.41 ± 0.23a | 44.175 ± 1.18b | 30.31 ± 5.38c | 51.18 ± 7.11a | 6.79 ± 2.46b | |
| Estragole | 1.04 ± 0.36b | 39.0 ± 1.91bcd | 65.02 ± 8.00ab | 64.59 ± 2.00a | 1.84 ± 1.24b | |
| Anethole | 0.36 ± 0.06ab | 34.82 ± 1.03cd | 46.26 ± 3.61bc | 72.95 ± 8.84a | 7.23 ± 3.27b | |
| gamma-Terpinene | 0.86 ± 0.35ab | 34.1 ± 2.38d | 36.40 ± 2.99c | 50.38 ± 6.82a | 6.62 ± 2.65b | |
| beta-Myrcene | 0.81 ± 0.29ab | 40.8 ± 2.81bc | 25.55 ± 3.57d | 38.71 ± 8.30a | 7.84 ± 2.84b | |
| 2 × MTC | 1.38 ± 0.17a | 100 ± 0a | 83.80 ± 11.46a | 69.67 ± 14.11a | 98.85 ± 0.94a | |
1 × MTC and 2 × MTC indicate that the concentrations of the mixture were 1 and 2 times the rhizosphere soil concentrations, respectively (mixture = 6.13 μg/mL beta-myrcene + 67.48 μg/mL
Different letters in the same group indicate significant differences as determined by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05).
The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means (n = 3).
FIGURE 6Fennel root exudates and terpene compounds induced ROS accumulation in P. capsici hyphae. Bar = 50 μm.