| Literature DB >> 35755669 |
Yi Sun1, Yaxin Yuan1, Yifei Luo1, Wenxiang Ji1, Qingyao Bian1, Zequn Zhu1, Jingru Wang1, Yu Qin2, Xiong Zhao He3, Meng Li1, Shuhua Yi1.
Abstract
Plant species diversity (PSD) is essential in evaluating the function and developing the management and conservation strategies of grassland. However, over a large region, an efficient and high precision method to monitor multiscale PSD (α-, β-, and γ-diversity) is lacking. In this study, we proposed and improved an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based PSD monitoring method (UAVB) and tested the feasibility, and meanwhile, explored the potential relationship between multiscale PSD and precipitation on the alpine grassland of the source region of the Yellow River (SRYR), China. Our findings showed that: (1) UAVB was more representative (larger monitoring areas and more species identified with higher α- and γ-diversity) than the traditional ground-based monitoring method, though a few specific species (small in size) were difficult to identify; (2) UAVB is suitable for monitoring the multiscale PSD over a large region (the SRYR in this study), and the improvement by weighing the dominance of species improved the precision of α-diversity (higher R 2 and lower P values of the linear regressions); and (3) the species diversity indices (α- and β-diversity) increased first and then they tended to be stable with the increase of precipitation in SRYR. These findings conclude that UAVB is suitable for monitoring multiscale PSD of an alpine grassland community over a large region, which will be useful for revealing the relationship of diversity-function, and helpful for conservation and sustainable management of the alpine grassland.Entities:
Keywords: FragMAP; diversity monitoring; multiscale diversity; species diversity; unmanned aerial vehicle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755669 PMCID: PMC9218072 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.905715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Spatial annual precipitation (mean of 2000–2017) and the location of sampling sites among the source region of the Yellow River on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
Figure 2Field sampling method: (a) waypoints (large red dots), flight trajectory (red dashed line), and area of aerial photograph (black frame with the center represented by black dots); (b) aerial photograph taken by MAVIC Pro at the height of 2 m; (c) traditional ground-based measurement (3 quadrats selected randomly among 16 sampling sites); and (d) real-time sampling along the “Belt” trajectory of FragMAP system.
Figure 3The number of species identified within the sampling unit by the traditional sampling method (TSMQ) and the UAV-based method (UAVB). ***Indicates significant difference at P < 0.001 level.
Figure 4Relationships of α- (A–D) and β-diversity indices estimated (E,F) by the traditional quadrat-based (TSMQ) and UAV-based (UAVB) methods. The gray circles and dashed regression lines indicate the presence-based method (UAVB), while the black circles and full regression lines indicate the dominance-based method (UAVBD) to the α-diversity indices; the thin dashed line represents the 1:1 line.
Figure 5Responses of α- (A–D) and β-diversity indices (E,F) to mean annual precipitation (2000–2017). The gray circles and dashed regression lines indicate the traditional sampling method (TSMQ), while the black circles and full regression lines indicate the presence-based sampling method (UAVB, the improved dominance-based method for A–D, UAVBD).
Figure 7Responses of β-diversity (A,B) to mean annual precipitation (2000–2017) based on the data collected by UAVB.
Figure 6Responses of α-diversity (A–D) to mean annual precipitation (2000–2017) based on the data collected by UAVBD. The samples sampled in semi-arid regions were marked by dashed rectangles.