| Literature DB >> 35755646 |
Zhao Zhang1,2,3,4, Yongliang Qiao5, Yangyang Guo1,3,4, Dongjian He1,3,4.
Abstract
Grape downy mildew (GDM) disease is a common plant leaf disease, and it causes serious damage to grape production, reducing yield and fruit quality. Traditional manual disease detection relies on farm experts and is often time-consuming. Computer vision technologies and artificial intelligence could provide automatic disease detection for real-time controlling the spread of disease on the grapevine in precision viticulture. To achieve the best trade-off between GDM detection accuracy and speed under natural environments, a deep learning based approach named YOLOv5-CA is proposed in this study. Here coordinate attention (CA) mechanism is integrated into YOLOv5, which highlights the downy mildew disease-related visual features to enhance the detection performance. A challenging GDM dataset was acquired in a vineyard under a nature scene (consisting of different illuminations, shadows, and backgrounds) to test the proposed approach. Experimental results show that the proposed YOLOv5-CA achieved a detection precision of 85.59%, a recall of 83.70%, and a mAP@0.5 of 89.55%, which is superior to the popular methods, including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv3, and YOLOv5. Furthermore, our proposed approach with inference occurring at 58.82 frames per second, could be deployed for the real-time disease control requirement. In addition, the proposed YOLOv5-CA based approach could effectively capture leaf disease related visual features resulting in higher GDE detection accuracy. Overall, this study provides a favorable deep learning based approach for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of grape leaf diseases in the field of automatic disease detection.Entities:
Keywords: attention mechanism; data augmentation; deep learning; digital agriculture; disease detection; grape downy mildew
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755646 PMCID: PMC9227981 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.872107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Figure 1Commercial vineyard and acquired images under natural light conditions.
Figure 2The architecture of the proposed YOLOv5-CA based GDM detection.
Figure 3Schematic of coordinate attention module.
Comparison of different GDM methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faster R-CNN | 79.97 | 87.80 | 83.70 | 80.65 | 35.90 |
| YOLOv4 | 82.69 | 83.63 | 83.15 | 82.65 | 75.20 |
| YOLOv5 | 85.35 | 81.45 | 83.36 | 87.41 | 84.74 |
| YOLOv5-CA | 85.59 | 83.70 | 84.63 | 89.55 | 58.82 |
Figure 4Examples of different GDM detection attention methods. (A) Faster R-CNN, (B) YOLOv4, (C) YOLOv5, and (D) YOLOV5-CA.
Figure 5Examples of YOLOv5-CA based GDM detection results.
Grape downy mildew Detection performance with different network input sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112 ×112 | 80.32 | 72.76 | 76.35 | 76.71 | 102.04 |
| 224 ×224 | 83.73 | 79.32 | 81.47 | 82.63 | 92.63 |
| 320 ×320 | 84.75 | 84.32 | 84.53 | 85.25 | 76.92 |
| 416 ×416 | 85.59 | 83.70 | 84.63 | 89.55 | 58.82 |
| 512 ×512 | 86.71 | 82.80 | 84.71 | 87.89 | 45.45 |
Figure 6Examples of Bounding box based data augmentation. (A) Manual label, (B) Flip (vertical), (C) Flip (horizontal), (D) Crop, (E) Rotation, (F) Shear, (G) Brightness, and (H) Gaussian blur.
Comparison of different GDM methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv5-CA | 85.59 | 83.70 | 84.63 | 89.55 |
| YOLOv5-CA (with data augmentation) | 88.82 | 83.63 | 86.15 | 90.02 |