Michael D Jorgensen1, Jean Chmielewski1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, United States.
Abstract
Peptide nanotube biomaterials are attractive for their range of applications. Herein, we disclose the co-assembly of coiled-coil peptides, one with ligands for metal ions that demonstrate hierarchical assembly into nanotubes, with spatial control of the metal-binding ligands. Enhanced stability of the nanotubes to phosphate-buffered saline was successfully accomplished in a metal-dependent fashion, depending on the levels and placement of the ligand-containing coiled-coil peptide. This spatial control also allowed for site-specific labeling of the nanotubes with His-tagged fluorophores through the length of the tubes or at the termini, in a metal-dependent manner.
Peptide nanotube biomaterials are attractive for their range of applications. Herein, we disclose the co-assembly of coiled-coil peptides, one with ligands for metal ions that demonstrate hierarchical assembly into nanotubes, with spatial control of the metal-binding ligands. Enhanced stability of the nanotubes to phosphate-buffered saline was successfully accomplished in a metal-dependent fashion, depending on the levels and placement of the ligand-containing coiled-coil peptide. This spatial control also allowed for site-specific labeling of the nanotubes with His-tagged fluorophores through the length of the tubes or at the termini, in a metal-dependent manner.
Nanotube biomaterials
have drawn significant attention for their
applications ranging from piezoelectric devices to cargo delivery.[1] While less common than simpler nanofibrils, these
three-dimensional materials contain an inner cavity and outer shell
to allow for multifunctionality. Peptide-based nanotubes specifically
are an attractive choice owing to their tunability and biocompatibility.[2−4] As such, peptide nanotubes have been derived from a diverse collection
of structures including dipeptides,[5−9] cyclic peptides,[10−25] peptoids,[26−29] triple helices,[30,31] β-sheets,[32−35] and coiled-coils.[36−42]The assembly and morphology of peptide nanotubes provide the
opportunity
for a range of interesting biological applications. For example, early
studies with cyclic peptide nanotubes focused on interactions with
the cell membrane to mimic membrane-bound proteins and form ion channels.[10,11,19−21,23] Since then, nanotubes have been developed with antibacterial
properties, including dipeptide nanotubes clearing biofilms[7] and cyclic peptide nanotubes lysing bacterial
membranes.[12,25] β-sheet nanotubes have
been used for directed delivery of an anticancer agent to metastatic
melanoma,[34] whereas coiled-coil nanotubes,
composed of the peptide TriNL (Figure A), for instance, have been loaded with a
biopolymer cargo.[42]
Figure 1
Peptide nanotube co-assemblies.
(A) Peptide sequences of the coiled-coil
(CC) peptides TriNL and p2L. (B) Schematic
of co-assembly strategies for incorporating p2L into TriNL nanotubes for potential stabilization with metal ions:
forming mixed peptide CC through thermal annealing and using stepwise
addition to bring in CC trimers of p2L.
Peptide nanotube co-assemblies.
(A) Peptide sequences of the coiled-coil
(CC) peptides TriNL and p2L. (B) Schematic
of co-assembly strategies for incorporating p2L into TriNL nanotubes for potential stabilization with metal ions:
forming mixed peptide CC through thermal annealing and using stepwise
addition to bring in CC trimers of p2L.Coiled-coil nanotubes of TriNL have the potential
for molecular storage and drug delivery, but instability in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) limited biological applications. Herein, we demonstrate
the co-assembly of TriNL with a variant containing metal-binding
ligands that produces nanotubes with enhanced PBS stability in a metal-dependent
manner while also promoting His-tagged cargo binding.
Experimental
Section
Circular Dichroism
A TriNL-Fl solution
(50 μM) was prepared in citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 3.0). The
circular dichroism (CD) spectrum was taken at 4 and at 90 °C
by averaging three scans between 190 and 260 nm.
Fluorimetry
A 15 μL aliquot of a 550 μM TriNL-Fl solution
with varying p2L concentrations
was annealed (90 °C for 30 min, 4 °C for >18 h). The
samples
were diluted with 985 μL of PBS and fluorescence measurements
were conducted with an excitation wavelength of 490 ± 2.5 nm
and an emission bandwidth of 0.5 nm.
Annealed Assemblies
Peptide solutions were prepared
in 15 μL aliquots and annealed (90 °C for 30 min, 4 °C
for >18 h). These aliquots were added to 35 μL of 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid buffer (MES, pH 6.0) to
create a final buffer concentration of 50 mM and a total peptide concentration
of 500 μM. Following a 30 min incubation at room temperature,
the assemblies were centrifuged at 10,000g for 3
min where the supernatant was removed and replaced with water. This
process was repeated two more times.
Stepwise Assemblies
Assemblies were conducted with
a total peptide concentration of 500 μM in a final MES buffer
concentration of 50 mM (pH 6.0). Specifically, TriNL and p2L were separately added to the MES buffer in the same buffer
ratio as the peptide ratio. After a 2 min incubation at room temperature, p2L was added to TriNL and allowed to assemble
for an additional 30 min. The samples were centrifuged at 10,000g for 3 min. The supernatant was removed, replaced with
water, and the process was repeated twice.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Aliquots of the assemblies
described above (3 μL) were placed on a glass coverslip attached
to a metal stub via a copper tape. The samples were either air-dried
or lyophilized and platinum-coated. Samples were imaged using an FEI
Teneo Volumescope field emission scanning electron microscope.
Degradation
Studies
Peptides were assembled using the
protocol above. Following washing, the samples were incubated in 1
mM NiCl2 for 1 h at room temperature. The material was
centrifuged at 10,000g for 3 min, the supernatant
was removed, and the samples were resuspended in 50 μL of 1×
PBS for 24 h at room temperature.
Cargo Binding
Peptides were assembled using the protocol
above in the presence of 1 mg/mL fluorescein-labeled anionic dextran
(MW 40,000). Following washing, the samples were incubated in 1 mM
NiCl2 for 1 h at room temperature. The material was centrifuged
at 10,000g for 3 min, and the supernatant was removed
followed by resuspension in 50 mM MES buffer (pH 6.0) and 20 μM
Rh-His6. After a 48 h incubation, the samples were washed
as above and imaged on a Nikon A1R multiphoton inverted confocal microscope
under a 100× oil objective using 488 and 561 nm excitation lasers.
Results and Discussion
Co-assembled Peptide Nanotube Design
The design of
the stabilized nanotubes is based on the leucine-zipper motif of the
transcription factor GCN4. A dimeric coiled-coil in its native form
and the GCN4 sequence have been modified to form trimeric coiled-coils.[43] This trimeric sequence was the basis of the TriNL peptide (Figure A) that assembles into nanotubes while encapsulating the biopolymer
cargo.[42] However, upon exposure to PBS,
these coiled-coil peptide tubes were found to rapidly deteriorate.
To promote stability, therefore, we hypothesized that the introduction
of a coiled-coil peptide with metal-binding ligands as a part of the
nanotubes might strengthen the interactions between coiled-coils in
a metal-dependent fashion and potentially decrease the rate of tube
degradation (Figure B). To this end, we looked at the coiled-coil peptide p2L with di-histidine and nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) ligands at the
C- and N-termini, respectively (Figures A and S1).[44] The p2L peptide alone has been
shown to form hexagonal crystals with zinc ions,[44] but here we wished to investigate what levels of p2L could be added to TriNL while retaining the
tube morphology and whether stabilized nanotubes would result (Figure B).In the
design of nanotubes comprised of two peptides, heterotrimeric coiled-coil
mixtures composed of both TriNL and p2L or
individual homotrimers of TriNL and p2L could
be used as building blocks (Figure B). Herein, both coiled-coil assemblies were explored,
either through prior thermal annealing or sequential addition of the
two peptides, to allow for spatial control of p2L within
the nanotubes. These co-assemblies, in turn, may allow us to tune
nanotube stability and bring in His-tagged cargo in a metal-dependent
fashion.
Peptide Synthesis
Peptides were synthesized using standard
Fmoc-based solid-phase peptide synthesis on the ChemMatrix Rink Amide
resin with hexafluorophosphate azabenzotriazole tetramethyl uronium
(HATU) as a coupling reagent. The protected NTA amino acid was synthesized
as previously described.[45] The peptides
were cleaved from the resin using a trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) cocktail,
purified to homogeneity via reverse-phase high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC), and characterized via matrix-assisted laser
desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-ToF) mass spectrometry
(Figures S2 and S3).
Previous studies
have shown that thermal annealing of two different
dimeric coiled-coils can give rise to mixed coiled-coils at statistical
levels with their homodimeric counterparts.[46] Motivated by this work, and that of others studying mixed coiled-coils,[47−66] we first pursued a strategy to co-assemble p2L and TriNL within nanotubes by intermixing the peptides at the
supersecondary structure level using thermal annealing. In this way,
we could create a mixture of coiled-coils with some containing both TriNL and p2L.Circular dichroism (CD)
was initially used to study coiled-coil folding by monitoring the
two negative absorption bands at 222 and 208 nm. CD spectra were taken
at 4 and 90 °C using a 2:1 ratio of TriNL and p2L (500 μM total peptide concentration, Figure S4). Elevated temperature (90 °C)
led to a decrease in helical content from 90 to 58%, and subsequent
cooling to 4 °C promoted refolding to 97% α-helicity. It
is worth noting that in the low-temperature spectra the magnitude
of the absorption at 222 nm is higher than that at 208 nm (θ222/θ208 ∼ 1.5), which has been shown
to be indicative of the presence of a coiled-coil.[67] At 90 °C, however, this ratio decreased to ∼1.1,
demonstrating lower levels of the coiled-coil fold.With CD
supporting the refolding of the coiled-coils through thermal
annealing, the formation of heterotrimeric coiled-coils was verified
using the fluorometric assay of Xiao and co-workers.[68] This assay relies on fluorescence self-quenching of fluorophores
at the termini of peptides’ trimeric assemblies. With this
in mind, fluorescein was installed at the N-terminus of TriNL (TriNL-Fl, Figures S5 and S6). If unlabeled p2L is introduced into the labeled coiled-coil
through thermal annealing, an increase in fluorescence due to less
fluorescein self-quenching should result. The coiled-coil refolding
process was monitored by measuring the fluorescence of TriNL-Fl (8.5 μM) with varying amounts of p2L before and
after thermal annealing (Figures and S7). All solutions
exhibited similar initial fluorescence readings prior to annealing.
Following annealing, however, an increase in fluorescence was observed
relative to the amount of p2L in solution, with up to
a 1.9-fold increase at a ratio of 2:1 TriNL-Fl:p2L (Figure ). Additionally, the fluorescence of TriNL-Fl did not
increase when annealed in the absence of p2L, further
demonstrating that any observed increase in fluorescence was due to
intermixed coiled-coil formation rather than the annealing process.
Figure 2
Fluorescence
spectra of TriNL-Fl (8.5 μM) before
and after annealing in the presence of increasing levels of p2L.
Fluorescence
spectra of TriNL-Fl (8.5 μM) before
and after annealing in the presence of increasing levels of p2L.
Nanotube Formation: Thermally
Annealed Samples
With
intermixed coiled-coils available through thermal annealing, nanotube
formation was investigated. All assembly experiments were conducted
with a total peptide concentration of 500 μM in MES buffer (50
mM, pH 6.0) at room temperature for 30 min, with a range of TriNL:p2L ratios (1:1–50:1). Upon assembly,
the precipitate was collected via centrifugation and washed. Peptide
levels within the assemblies were determined by first dissolving the
material with aqueous HCl, followed by quantitation using reverse-phase
UPLC (Figure S8 and Table S1). The experimentally
determined ratios of TriNL and p2L in the
assemblies were quite similar to starting ratios of the two peptides
in solution, indicating that both of the peptides entered the materials
at levels close to the added amounts.Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) was used to determine if the TriNL nanotube morphology
(Figure A) was maintained
with the added p2L. Indeed, upon increasing the amount
of p2L up to a ratio of 10:1 TriNL:p2L (Figure B–D), we observed definitive nanotubes, with lengths in the
10–15 μm range and inner diameters in the range of 400–800
nm (n = 10). From these experiments and the UPLC
data, we can confirm that up 9% incorporation of p2L (10:1)
still allows the nanotubes to form. Interestingly, assemblies that
form with 17–33% of p2L (5:1 and 2:1) have a hexagonal
rod morphology (Figure E,F), with an inner channel in the case of the 5:1 ratio. A 1:1 ratio
of peptides provided similar rods as the 2:1 mixtures (Figure S9), although lower levels of assembly
were observed. Although no metals are used in these experiments, this
observed morphology is reminiscent of the assemblies formed with p2L and metal ions, albeit the current assemblies have an
increased aspect ratio (∼3.5-times increase in the length/diameter).[44] It is important to note that p2L does not assemble on its own, without metal ions, under these conditions.
Figure 3
SEM visualization
of assemblies of (A) TriNL and at
different ratios of TriNL:p2L. (B–F)
Annealed samples and (G, H) stepwise addition of the peptide. Insets
show the interior morphology of the assemblies (inset scale bar: 500
nm).
SEM visualization
of assemblies of (A) TriNL and at
different ratios of TriNL:p2L. (B–F)
Annealed samples and (G, H) stepwise addition of the peptide. Insets
show the interior morphology of the assemblies (inset scale bar: 500
nm).
Nanotubes formed only with TriNL exhibit limited stability
in the presence of PBS buffer with degradation of the tubes at the
termini and dissolution into shard-like tube fragments (Figure A).[42] The introduction of the ligand-containing p2L peptide,
through thermal annealing, allows for the potential of using metal–ligand
interactions to increase the stability of the tubes. With this in
mind, the degradation of the nanotube co-assemblies in PBS was investigated
at different TriNL:p2L ratios with added
Ni(II), a metal ion that has been used extensively for His-tags with
NTA. Preformed nanotubes were first incubated in NiCl2 (1
mM, 1 h) and subsequently resuspended in PBS (10 mM phosphate, 137
mM NaCl, pH 7.4) for 24 h. The resulting materials were imaged using
SEM. With low levels of p2L (2–5%), there was
distinct erosion at the ends into the center of the nanotubes upon
exposure to PBS (Figure B,C). Increasing the p2L content to 9%, however, resulted
in intact nanotubes (Figure D). In the absence of Ni(II), the co-assembled nanotubes were
found to degrade more substantially than with TriNL alone,
with only small pieces of nanotubes remaining (Figure S10). The addition of p2L may be destabilizing
the tubes due to the charge ligands at each terminus. Overall, these
data support the idea that the observed nanotube stabilization is
derived from metal–ligand interactions from p2L within the nanotubes.
Figure 4
Stability of nanotubes formed with TriNL or TriNL:p2L ratios after a 24 h incubation
with
PBS. (A) TriNL alone; (B–D) pre-annealed TriNL:p2L at a (B) 50:1 ratio, (C) 20:1 ratio,
and (D) 10:1 ratio; and (E, F) stepwise addition of TriNL:p2L at a (E) 10:1 ratio and (F) 2:1 ratio.
Stability of nanotubes formed with TriNL or TriNL:p2L ratios after a 24 h incubation
with
PBS. (A) TriNL alone; (B–D) pre-annealed TriNL:p2L at a (B) 50:1 ratio, (C) 20:1 ratio,
and (D) 10:1 ratio; and (E, F) stepwise addition of TriNL:p2L at a (E) 10:1 ratio and (F) 2:1 ratio.
The presence
of ligands for metal ions within the mixed coiled-coil
nanotubes presents the opportunity of using these interactions to
facilitate the binding of the cargo functionalized with metal-binding
ligands. Previously, the TriNL nanotubes were shown to
encapsulate fluorescently labeled anionic dextrans within their interior.[42] Similarly, the co-assembled nanotubes resulting
from thermally annealed peptide mixtures also encapsulated anionic,
fluorescein-labeled dextrans (Figure A). However, after treating both of these tubes with
NiCl2 (1 mM, 1 h), followed by treatment with His-tagged
rhodamine (Rh-His6, 20 μM, 48 h), only the nanotubes
co-assembled with p2L were found to have rhodamine fluorescence
throughout the tubes (Figure B vs S11). Also, without the addition
of Ni(II), no Rh-His6 association with the mixed coiled-coil
tubes was observed (Figure S12). These
data demonstrate the importance of metal-loaded ligands within the
nanotubes for His-tagged fluorophore binding and suggest that p2L is distributed throughout the assembly.
Figure 5
Confocal microscopy of
co-assembled TriNL:p2L nanotubes. (A,B)
Annealed nanotubes with encapsulated fluorescein-labeled
dextran (1 mg/mL, 40 kD) (A) alone and (B) with pretreated NiCl2 (1 mM) followed by Rh-His6 (20 μM). (C,D)
Nanotubes from stepwise addition with encapsulated fluorescein-labeled
dextran (1 mg/mL, 40 kD) (C) alone and (D) with pretreated NiCl2 (1 mM) followed by Rh-His6 (20 μM). (B)
and (D) Overlay of both the red and green channels.
Confocal microscopy of
co-assembled TriNL:p2L nanotubes. (A,B)
Annealed nanotubes with encapsulated fluorescein-labeled
dextran (1 mg/mL, 40 kD) (A) alone and (B) with pretreated NiCl2 (1 mM) followed by Rh-His6 (20 μM). (C,D)
Nanotubes from stepwise addition with encapsulated fluorescein-labeled
dextran (1 mg/mL, 40 kD) (C) alone and (D) with pretreated NiCl2 (1 mM) followed by Rh-His6 (20 μM). (B)
and (D) Overlay of both the red and green channels.
Nanotube Formation and Stability: Stepwise Addition
Motivated
by the results of nanotube cargo loading and stability
after including p2L into the TriNL tubes
using thermal annealing, we sought an additional way to control the
location of the ligand-containing p2L peptide within
the nanotubes. To this end, we investigated the addition of individual
coiled-coils of TriNL and p2L in a stepwise
fashion at 10:1 and 2:1 ratios. Attempts to simultaneously add the
two peptides led to results that were difficult to replicate. Therefore,
we chose to add the p2L coiled-coils to TriNL trimers after a 2 min incubation of the latter peptide in MES buffer
(50 mM, pH 6.0). The combined peptides (500 μM total) were then
incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and the precipitates were
collected and washed. SEM analysis of the assemblies demonstrated
morphologies that were similar to those obtained with the thermally
annealed, co-assembled nanotubes. The 10:1 TriNL:p2L ratio provided nanotubes (Figure G), whereas the 2:1 ratio led to hexagonal
rods with an aspect ratio of ∼9 (length/diameter) (Figure H). UPLC analysis
was used to determine the levels of p2L in the tubes/rods
after acid treatment to dissolve the assemblies. As opposed to the
thermally annealed samples, the assemblies formed from stepwise addition
contained substantially lower levels of the ligand-containing p2L (10:0.3 and 2:0.5 TriNL:p2L ratios,
respectively) (Table S2).Although
the nanotubes obtained from the two different assembly techniques
at a 10:1 ratio of peptides looked similar at the micron scale, the
two sets of tubes behaved quite differently when treated first with
NiCl2 and then with PBS. The nanotube morphology was retained
in the thermally annealed co-assemblies in PBS after metal ion treatment
(Figure D), whereas
the sequential assemblies showed notable disintegration of the tube
interior with PBS, with the ends of the tubes remained somewhat intact
(Figure E). This latter
PBS degradation pattern was also observed after Ni(II) treatment of
the nanorods derived from the sequential assembly of the 2:1 ratio
of peptides (Figure F). Regions of the interior of the hexagonal rods were eaten away
leaving hollow shells with defined ends. These data may indicate that
the ends of these nanotubes/rods are rich in p2L coiled-coils
and addition of metal ions could stabilize these regions. To determine
if these terminal ends contain more p2L than the entire
structure, the 10:1 and 2:1 stepwise assemblies and their corresponding
PBS-degraded materials (Figure E,F) were dissolved with aqueous HCl, and their peptide contents
were quantified via UPLC (Table S2). We
observed an increase in the p2L levels after PBS treatment
of 2.7- and 6.8-fold, respectively, compared to the intact nanotubes/rods.
These data indicate that the percentage of p2L is higher
at the ends than in the center of the material. It is likely that
substantial nanotube/rod formation occurs with TriNL in
the 2 min prior to p2L addition, thereby leading to an
abundance of p2L near the ends of the assemblies.
As an additional
means to verify the location of the metal-binding p2L, we also investigated where His-tagged rhodamine binds
to the co-assembled nanotubes formed from sequential addition. Preformed
nanotubes (10:1) with encapsulated dextran (Figure C) were subjected to Ni(II) incubation followed
by Rh-His6. Even after extended periods of time (48 h),
rhodamine fluorescence was only observed at the termini of the nanotubes
(Figure D). In contrast
to the annealed assemblies where the p2L peptide is likely
distributed throughout the tubes, all of the above observations provide
support for the p2L coiled-coils being substantially
localized near the end of the nanotubes when added sequentially (Figure ).
Figure 6
Schematic of PBS stability
results for the two strategies of p2L incorporation into TriNL nanotubes. (A) Annealed
samples led to p2L distribution throughout the tubes
via intermixed coiled-coils resulting in metal ion stabilization throughout
the length of the nanotubes. (B) Stepwise addition of individual coiled-coils
led to the concentration of p2L near the ends of the
nanotubes, followed by treatment with metal ions, resulting in PBS
degradation of the center of the tubes.
Schematic of PBS stability
results for the two strategies of p2L incorporation into TriNL nanotubes. (A) Annealed
samples led to p2L distribution throughout the tubes
via intermixed coiled-coils resulting in metal ion stabilization throughout
the length of the nanotubes. (B) Stepwise addition of individual coiled-coils
led to the concentration of p2L near the ends of the
nanotubes, followed by treatment with metal ions, resulting in PBS
degradation of the center of the tubes.
Conclusions
Peptide-based nanotubes hold great promise for
molecular storage
and drug delivery. Coiled-coil nanotubes derived from the peptide TriNL have been shown to encapsulate biopolymers, but instability
to PBS has limited their bioapplications.[42] Herein, we have demonstrated a means of incorporating the coiled-coil
forming peptide p2L, which contains ligands for metal
ions at both termini, into nanotube assemblies with TriNL. It was possible to tune the position of p2L in the
assemblies, either distributed throughout the tubes or localized near
the ends, depending on whether intermixed or individual coiled-coils
of p2L and TriNL were used. Indeed, this
spatial control of the position of p2L has led to both
stabilized nanotubes or tubes with stabilized ends, upon addition
of metal ions (Figure ). Metal-charged ligands derived from p2L were also
harnessed to bring His-tagged fluorophores to the full length or the
termini of the nanotubes, providing an additional readout for the
placement of the p2L peptide in the assemblies. The encapsulated
cargo within the nanotubes should have differing release profiles
depending on the stability of the tubes. It is likely that metal ion-based
stabilization will slow down the kinetics of the release of the cargo
from the nanotubes, since the tubes are more intact. Future experiments
will focus on the range of cargoes that may be placed on and within
the structure of these coiled-coil nanotubes.
Authors: Chunfu Xu; Rui Liu; Anil K Mehta; Ricardo C Guerrero-Ferreira; Elizabeth R Wright; Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz; Kyle Morris; Louise C Serpell; Xiaobing Zuo; Joseph S Wall; Vincent P Conticello Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Li Lei; Zhiai Xu; Xianli Hu; Yi Lai; Jie Xu; Bo Hou; Ya Wang; Haijun Yu; Yang Tian; Wen Zhang Journal: Small Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 13.281