| Literature DB >> 35755251 |
Marco Potowski1, Verena B K Kunig1, Lukas Eberlein2, Mateja Klika Škopić1, Alexandros Vakalopoulos3, Stefan M Kast2, Andreas Brunschweiger1.
Abstract
DNA-encoded libraries are a prime technology for target-based small molecule screening. Native DNA used as genetic compound barcode is chemically vulnerable under many reaction conditions. DNA barcodes that are composed of pyrimidine nucleobases, 7-deazaadenine, and 7-deaza-8-azaguanine have been investigated for their suitability for encoded chemistry both experimentally and computationally. These four-letter barcodes were readily ligated by T4 ligation, amplifiable by Taq polymerase, and the resultant amplicons were correctly sequenced. Chemical stability profiling showed a superior chemical stability compared to native DNA, though higher susceptibility to depurination than a three-letter code based on pyrimidine DNA and 7-deazaadenine.Entities:
Keywords: DNA-encoded chemistry; DNA-encoded library; chemically modified nucleobase; heterocyclic chemistry; multi-component reaction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755251 PMCID: PMC9218945 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.894563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1DNA-encoded libraries. (A) A DNA-encoded compound. (B) Split-and-pool DEL synthesis (C) DNA damage by depurination. (D) Previous work: Study of a chemically stabilized code consisting of nucleobases T, C, and 7-deazaA 1. (E) This work: From a three-to a four-letter barcode. Investigation of 8a-7-deazaG 2; PG, protective group: benzoyl (1) or DMF (2).
FIGURE 2(A) Calculated standard reaction free energies ΔG (kcalmol−1) and populations for selected tautomeric forms of guanine derivatives I-IV relative to the Watson-Crick tautomers [I-IVa] accompanied by uncertainties from averaging over a range of methodsc. See SI for computational details. a Eberlein, 2020: 6.6 ± 0.7 kcal mol−1, b Eberlein, 2020: 7.5 ± 1.5 kcal mol−1, c Note that the uncertainties provided in Eberlein, 2020 and Potowski, 2021 were erroneously reported to be too small by a factor of 51/2 = 2.236. Uncertainties are here correct, and the corrected values are also given for reference calculations (Eberlein, 2020) on canonical guanine I a,b. This correction has no impact on energetic rankings and discussion of tautomer relevance. (B) Encoding strategy using stabilized DNA barcodes. (C) Results of the T4 ligation and PCR amplification, ligation carried out with 100 pmol of each oligonucleotide, 600 units of T4 DNA Ligase, gel electrophoresis performed with a 4% agarose gel. (D) Amplification efficiencies of a chemically stabilized DNA template and the corresponding native DNA template strand.
Stability screening of DNA barcodes 5 and 6 in presence of protic acids, metal salts and organic reagents.a
|
| |||||||
| Entry | Reagent | Solvent | 3 [11] | 4 [7] | 5 | 6 | |
| 1 | 3.7% HCl | H2O | |||||
| 2 | Ce(NH4)2(NO3)6 | MeOH | |||||
| 3 | Co(acac)3 | ACN | |||||
| 4 | Cu(MeCN)4PF6 | ACN | |||||
| 5 | FeCl2 ∙ 4 H2O | ACN | |||||
| 6b | La(O | THF | |||||
| 7 | Ni(acac)2 | ACN | |||||
| 8 | Pd(OAc)2 | ACN | |||||
| 9 | RuCl3 | ACN | |||||
| 10 | Grubbs 1st Gen | CH2Cl2 | |||||
| 11 | Sc(OTf)3 | ACN | |||||
| 12c | Sc(OTf)3 | ACN | |||||
| 13 | SeO2 | MeOH | |||||
| 14 | VO(acac)2 | MeOH | |||||
| 15 | ZnCl2 | ACN | |||||
| 16 | DDQ | EtOH | |||||
| 17 | PIDA | ACN | |||||
| 18 | TEMPO | ACN | |||||
| Degree of DNA degradation | |||||||
| 0–20% | 21–40% | 41–60% | >61% | ||||
a For each: 20 nmol DNA, aqueous acids or 200 equiv. transition metal salt or 200 equiv. organic reagent, 50 µL solvent, rt, 22 h b Poor solubility, added as suspension. c Experiment was performed at 40 °C. AMA, aq. NH3/MeNH2, ACN, acetonitrile, MeOH, methanol.
FIGURE 3Translation of reactions to CPG-bound DNA-starting materials. (A) Isocyanide MCR chemistries; a) MeOH, 50 °C, b) aq. NH3/MeNH2 (AMA), c) MeOH, 50 °C, d) 1% acetic acid/MeOH, 50 °C. (B) Protic acid-promoted reactions; e) (R)‐(‐)‐BNDHP, EtOH 50 °C, f) (R)‐(‐)‐ BNDHP, EtOH/TEOF, 50 °C, g) 5% TFA, CH2Cl2, rt. (C) Metal ion-promoted reactions; h) CuCl/bpy, DMF/TEOF, 50 °C, i) ZnCl2, ACN/TEOF, rt, j) aq. NH3, 50 °C, 6 h, k) Yb(OTf)3, CH2Cl2/TEOF, rt, l) Yb(PFO)3, toluene, 50 °C, m) AuI/AgSbF6, THF, rt, n) Ipr AuCl/AgOTf, ACN, 50 °C, o) AuI/AgOTf, glacial acetic acid, 60 °C. p) 10% TFA in H2O, 4 h. a,bConversion and DNA degradation determined by HPLC. cadditional 11% of undefined byproduct. dadditional 12% of undefined byproduct. eadditional 15% of undefined byproducts. fadditional 20% of undefined byproducts. AuI=[Tris(2,4‐di‐tert‐butylphenyl)phosphite]-gold chloride. Sequence of all DNA oligonucleotides used in the reactions: CT*C TCT 7De8a‐dGTC T7De8a‐dGT 7De‐dACC T.
FIGURE 4Exemplary DNA-encoded library design based on the Petasis reaction. DEL synthesis is initiated with coupling of secondary amines to the stabilized barcode. Petasis reaction on encoded amines gives for instance diverse N-substituted arylglycines. These are purified, encoded and substituted by amide bond formation in the third reaction step giving a library of diverse N-substituted arylglycine amides.