| Literature DB >> 35755205 |
Stefan Piantella1, William T O'Brien2, Matthew W Hale1, Paul Maruff3, Stuart J McDonald2, Bradley J Wright1.
Abstract
Jockeys work in high-risk environments that rely heavily on attention- and decision-making to perform well and safely. Workplace stress literature has often overlooked the impact of stress on cognition, and designs that include physiological measures are rare. This study assessed the prospective concurrent relationships between workplace stress, depression symptoms and low-grade inflammation with cognitive performance among professional jockeys. Professional jockeys (N = 35, Mage = 32.29) provided information on workplace stress and depression symptoms, with serum levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, TNFα) and cytokine balance (IL-6: IL-10, TNFα: IL-10) quantified with SIMOA, and cognitive performance with CogSport computer-based testing battery. These measures were repeated after a twelve-month interval. Increased workplace stress between testing intervals was associated to an increased cytokine imbalance (β = 0.447, p = .015) after controlling for age and gender. Increases in cytokine imbalance occurred in unison with decreases in attention (β = 0.516, p = .002), decision-making (β = 0.452, p = .009) and working memory (β = 0.492, p = .004). These preliminary findings suggest the underlying mechanisms linking workplace stress and reduced cognitive performance may be influenced by measures of low-grade inflammation and specifically a cytokine imbalance. Our findings suggest a measure of cytokine balance may explain the heterogenous findings in previous studies that have focussed solely on the association of workplace stress with pro-inflammatory cytokines. Future work is needed however, to provide a broader evidence-base for our claims to better inform designs to intervene in the higher workplace stress-poorer cognition relationship.Entities:
Keywords: CRP; CRP, C-reactive protein; CV, Coefficient of variation; CogSport; Cognition; DASS-21, Depression, Anxiety and Stress scale 21; DET, Detection task; ERI, effort reward imbalance model; Effort-reward imbalance; HPA-axis, Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; IDN, Identification task; IL-10, interleukin-10; IL-4, interleukin-4; IL-6, interleukin-6; Inflammation; Longitudinal; OCL, one card learning task; ONB, one-back task; T1, Timepoint 1; T2, Timepoint 2; TNFα, Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha
Year: 2022 PMID: 35755205 PMCID: PMC9216657 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2022.100131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol ISSN: 2666-4976
Fig. 1Flow chart outlining data selection.
Descriptive statistics of workplace stress, depression symptoms, inflammatory markers, and CogSport measures in jockeys (N = 35).
| Measure | Variable | T1 | T2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | p | d | ||
| Workplace stress | Efforts | 17.49 | 3.79 | 15.97 | 3.20 | .023 | .433 |
| Rewards | 30.03 | 4.32 | 29.40 | 4.67 | .339 | .140 | |
| ERI | 1.00 | 0.32 | 0.93 | 0.25 | .125 | .244 | |
| Depression Symptoms | Depression symptoms | 2.28 | 3.25 | 3.97 | 3.37 | .189 | .185 |
| Inflammatory markers | IL-6, pg/mL | 1.13 | 0.95 | 1.19 | 0.89 | .417 | .178 |
| TNFα, pg/mL | 2.92 | 0.97 | 3.02 | 1.23 | .669 | .090 | |
| IL-10, pg/mL | 1.41 | 1.21 | 1.29 | 0.77 | .806 | .044 | |
| IL-6: IL-10 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.02 | 0.67 | .285 | .217 | |
| TNFα: IL-10 | 2.63 | 1.10 | 2.72 | 1.00 | .621 | .086 | |
| Cognitive tasks | DET | 2.48 | 0.07 | 2.52 | 0.09 | .021 | .399 |
| IDN | 2.64 | 0.06 | 2.67 | 0.06 | .049 | .421 | |
| OCL | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.10 | 0.10 | .570 | .095 | |
| ONB | 2.82 | 0.08 | 2.81 | 0.08 | .849 | -.125 | |
Note. pg/mL: picograms per millilitre; ERI = effort reward imbalance, IL-6 = interleukin 6, TNFα = tumour necrosis factor alpha, IL-10 = interleukin 10, DET = detection task, IDN = identification task, OCL = one card learning task, ONB = one-back task; Raw means and standard deviations are presented but transformed values were used for all analyses. p-values were derived from a paired samples t-test based on the change score for each variable between T1 and T2, d = Cohen's d. Higher OCL denotes better performance, but for all other cognitive measures lower scores (time in milliseconds) denote better performance.
Correlation matrix depicting associations between change scores on key variables after controlling for age and gender (N = 35).
| Age | Gender | ERIΔ | Depression symptomsΔ | IL6Δ | TNFαΔ | IL10Δ | IL6:IL10Δ | TNFα:IL10Δ | DETΔ | IDNΔ | ONBΔ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | .149 | |||||||||||
| ERIΔ | .176 | - .015 | ||||||||||
| Depression symptomsΔ | - .203 | .313 | .209 | |||||||||
| IL6Δ | .254 | .149 | .316 | - .087 | ||||||||
| TNFαΔ | .006 | - .134 | .026 | - .161 | .484** | |||||||
| IL10Δ | - .015 | .180 | - .203 | .172 | - .471** | .683** | ||||||
| IL6:IL10Δ | .260 | .308 | .173 | .048 | .688** | - .040 | .316 | |||||
| TNFα:IL10Δ | - .088 | - .139 | .402* | .023 | .350* | .114 | - .747** | - .238 | ||||
| DETΔ | - .164 | .028 | .075 | - .030 | .071 | .060 | - .353* | - .214 | .512** | |||
| IDNΔ | .084 | - .088 | .212 | - .073 | .082 | - .062 | - .300 | - .158 | .447** | .478** | ||
| OCLΔ | .092 | - .192 | .062 | - .010 | - .026 | - .029 | - .036 | - .058 | .048 | .219 | - .070 | |
| ONBΔ | - .002 | - .001 | .286 | - .076 | .267 | .077 | - .401* | - .043 | .481** | .372* | .640** | - .314 |
Note. *p < .05, **p < .01; ERI = effort reward imbalance, IL6 = interleukin 6, TNFα = tumour necrosis factor alpha, IL10 = interleukin 10, DET = detection task, IDN = identification task, OCL = one card learning task, ONB = one-back task; Δ = change score; Δ was calculated by subtracting T2 values from T1 values. Higher scores on the OCL denote improved performance and higher change scores for DET, IDN and ONB denote poorer performance.
Hierarchical Regression of Age, Gender, and Changes in ERI and Depression Symptoms Predicting Changes in TNFα: IL-10 ratios (N = 35).
| TNFα: IL-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | Beta | p | |
| Step 1 | .024 | .678 | |
| Age | - .170 | ||
| Gender | - .083 | ||
| Step 2 | .180 | .047* | |
| ERI | .447* | ||
| Depression symptoms | -.079 | ||
Note. *p < .05, The full model (Step 1 + Step 2 variables) for TNFα: IL-10 was R = 0.204, F (4, 30) = 1.926, p = .132; ERI = effort reward imbalance, IL-6 = interleukin 6, IL-10 = interleukin 10, TNFα = tumour necrosis factor alpha.
Hierarchical regression of age, gender and changes in TNFα: IL-10 predicting changes in DET, IDN and ONB (N = 35).
| Predictor | Beta | p | Beta | p | Beta | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | .030 | .616 | .017 | .755 | .000 | .999 | |||
| Age | -.137 | .130 | .031 | ||||||
| Gender | -.120 | - .045 | .063 | ||||||
| Step 2 | .260 | .002* | .199 | .009** | .236 | .004** | |||
| TNFα: IL-10 | .516* | .452** | .492** | ||||||
Note: *p < .05, **p < .01; TNFα = tumour necrosis factor alpha, IL-10 = interleukin 10, DET = detection task, IDN = identification task, ONB = one-back task; Full model (Step 1 + Step 2 variables) for DET was R= 0.260, F (3, 31) = 4.223, p = .013, Full model for IDN was R = 0.217, F (3, 31) = 2.859, p = .053, Full model for ONB was R = 0.236, F (3, 31) = 3.199, p = .037. The regression did not include any variables at Step 2 for the OCL variable.
Fig. 2Path Diagram summarising Key Findings.
Note. Increased workplace stress (ERI) is associated with an increased cytokine imbalance (TNFα:IL-10), and increased cytokine imbalance is associated with poorer cognition (IDN, DET and ONB). Solid lines refer to significant associations and dotted lines refer to non-significant associations. ERI = effort reward imbalance, TNFα = tumour necrosis factor alpha, IL-10 = interleukin 10, DET = detection task, IDN = identification task, ONB = one-back task. The one card learning (OCL) task was not included in the path diagram as it contained no significant associations with the variables of interest.