| Literature DB >> 35754716 |
Ayushi Gupta1, Deepak Kumar Sinha1, Suresh Nair1.
Abstract
The brown planthopper (BPH) is a monophagous sap-sucking pest of rice that causes immense yield loss. The rapid build-up of pesticide resistance combined with the ability of BPH populations to quickly overcome host plant resistance has rendered conventional control strategies ineffective. One of the likely ways in which BPH adapts to novel environments is by undergoing rapid shifts in its microbiome composition. To elucidate the rapid adaptation to novel environments and the contributions of Pseudomonas toward insect survival, we performed Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA gut-microbiome profiling of BPH populations. Results revealed the differential occurrence of Pseudomonas species in BPH populations with changing climates and geographical locations. Further, the observed variation in Pseudomonas species composition and abundance correlated with BPH survivability. Collectively, this study, while adding to our current understanding of symbiont-mediated insect adaptation, also demonstrated a complex interplay between insect physiology and microbiome dynamics, which likely confers BPH its rapid adaptive capacity.Entities:
Keywords: Entomology; Microbiology; plant biology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35754716 PMCID: PMC9218508 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Figure 1Screening BPH populations, collected from different rice-growing regions in India, for the presence of Pseudomonas
(See ‘STAR Methods’ for details).
A 0.8% agarose gel showing the diagnostic 618 bp PCR-amplified Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA fragment (arrows on the left).
(A) Lanes 1–5: Delhi; 6–10: Nalgonda1; 11–15: Nalgonda2; 16: Blank; 17: 1Kb DNA Ladder.
(B) Lanes 1–5: Tripura; 6–10: Manipur; 11, 13 & 15: Blank; 12 & 14: Positive Control; 16: 1Kb DNA Ladder. Arrows on the right indicate the 500 bp and 750 bp fragments of the 1Kb ladder.
Figure 2Seasonal fluctuations of Pseudomonas in the BPH populations collected in Delhi over a period of seven months (May–Nov)
(See STAR Methods section for details).
(A) 0.8% agarose gel showing the 618 bp PCR-amplified Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA fragment. (i) Lanes 1–4: BPH individuals collected in May; Lane 5: Blank; Lane 6: 1Kb DNA Ladder; (ii) Lanes 1–5: DBOD individuals; Lanes 7–10 & 12–14: BPH individuals collected in June; Lanes 6 & 11: Blank; Lane 15: 1Kb DNA Ladder; Lanes 16–20: BPH individuals collected in November; Lanes 21, 23 & 25: Blank; Lanes 22 & 24: Positive control; Lane 26: 1Kb DNA Ladder; (iii) Lanes 1–5: BPH individuals collected in August; Lanes 6–7: Blank; Lane 8: 1Kb DNA Ladder.
(B) 0.8% agarose gel showing the absence of the 618 bp PCR-amplified Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA fragment in BPH individuals collected during the months of July, October, and September. (i) Lanes 1–5: BPH individuals collected in July; Lane 6: Positive control; Lane 7: No template control; Lane 8: 1Kb DNA Ladder; (ii) Lanes 1–4: BPH individuals collected in October; Lane 5: Positive control; Lane 6: No template control; Lane 7: Blank; Lane 8: 1Kb DNA Ladder; (iii) Lanes 1–7: BPH individuals collected in September; Lane 8: 1Kb DNA Ladder. The 500 bp () and 750 bp () fragments of the ladder are indicated.
Figure 3Comparative rarefaction curves indicating species richness of Pseudomonas in BPH populations and TN1 rice plants
Owing to most samples showing similar rarefaction curves, individual sample labels are not discernible.
Figure 4Boxplots representing the alpha diversity distribution of Pseudomonas sp. across BPH populations and TN1 rice plants
Pseudomonas sp. richness and diversity were measured using Chao1, Simpson, and Shannon indices, respectively.
Figure 5Beta diversity distribution of Pseudomonas sp. across BPH populations and TN1 rice plants using 3D principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots with each axis representing variation between samples (p-value cut-off ≤ 0.001).
Figure 6Identification of differentially abundant Pseudomonas species across BPH populations based on linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) along with their linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (p-value cut-off ≤ 0.05).
Figure 7Stacked bar plots depicting the variation in Pseudomonas species composition, their relative abundance and diversity between BPH populations and TN1 rice plants
Figure 8Core microbiome analysis with reference to Pseudomonas sp. across BPH populations
Heatmap representing their relative prevalence across BPH populations is shown with blue and red signifying the lowest and the highest values, respectively. The x axis represents the detection thresholds (indicated as relative abundance) from lower (left) to higher (right) abundance values. Color shading indicates the prevalence of each Pseudomonas species among samples for each abundance threshold. As we increase the detection threshold, the prevalence decreases.
Figure 9Hierarchical clustering analysis (based on the presence and abundance of different Pseudomonas sp.) performed for BPH populations and TNI rice plants
For clustering, the distance estimations based on Jaccard index and Ward’s linkage algorithm was used.
Figure 10Effect of pesticide (imidacloprid) on Pseudomonas titers in BPH as revealed by semi-quantitative PCR
Individuals from pesticide-exposed and un-exposed (control) BPH populations were assayed using semi-quantitative PCR with Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA primers to amplify a 618 bp fragment (for details see ‘STAR Methods’). Samples assayed were BPH individuals from a population (A) exposed to pesticide (1st generation; lanes 1–3) (B) exposed to pesticide (4th generation; lanes 4–6) (C) unexposed to pesticide (control; lanes 7–9) for over 23 generations (D) 1Kb DNA Ladder. The semi-quantitative PCR products were separated on a 1.0% agarose gel. Lanes 1–9: amplification of the Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA fragment from BPH individuals as indicated above the lanes; Lanes 10–11: Blank; Lane 12: 1Kb ladder. Figures and arrows on the left indicate the PCR amplified fragments and their respective sizes (618 bp Pseudomonas-specific 16S rRNA fragment and the 283 bp Actin fragment). The lower panel represents PCR amplification controls (Actin; see ‘STAR Methods’ for details) for the respective lanes on the upper panel. Arrows and figures on the right indicate the 750, 500, and 250 bp fragments of the 1Kb ladder.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Brown planthopper (BOD population) | New Delhi, India | DBOD |
| Brown planthopper (June population) | New Delhi, India | June |
| Brown planthopper (August population) | New Delhi, India | August |
| Brown planthopper (November population) | New Delhi, India | November |
| Brown planthopper (Manipur population) | Manipur, India | Manipur |
| Brown planthopper (Tripura population) | Tripura, India | Tripura |
| Brown planthopper (Nalgonda population; 2015) | Nalgonda, India | Nalgonda1 |
| Brown planthopper (Nalgonda population) | Nalgonda, India | Nalgonda2 |
| Rice, | TN1 variety | TN1 |
| Deoxynucleotide (dNTPs) Solution Mix | New England BioLabs, USA | Cat#N0446S |
| Taq DNA polymerase | BangaloreGeNei, India | Cat#0601600051730 |
| Imidacloprid (Confidor 17.80% SL) | Bayer AG, Germany | N/A |
| Gene ruler 1Kb DNA ladder | Thermo Scientific, USA | Cat#SM0311 |
| Vermiculite | AM Biotech, India | N/A |
| GF-1 Tissue DNA Extraction kit | Vivantis, Malaysia | Cat#GF-TD-050 |
| GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification kit | Thermo Scientific, USA | Cat#K0791 |
| Qubit dsDNA BR Assay kit | Invitrogen, USA | Cat#Q32853 |
| GF-1 AmbiClean kit (Gel & PCR) | Vivantis, Malaysia | Cat#GF-GC-100 |
| NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina | New England BioLabs, USA | Cat#E7645L |
| PCR Barcoding Expansion 1–96 kit | Oxford Nanopore Technology, UK | Cat#EXP-PBC096 |
| Ligation Sequencing Kit | Oxford Nanopore Technology, UK | Cat#SQK-LSK109 |
| Sequence Read Archive (SRA) files | NCBI, | GenBank: PRJNA733325 |
| Pseudo-S2-F | 5′-GACGGGTGAGTAATGCCTA-3′ | |
| Pseudo-S2-F | 5′-CACTGGTGTTCCTTCCTATA-3′ | |
| ACT-mod F | 5′-TGCGTGACATCAAGGAGAAGCTG-3′ | This study |
| ACT-mod R | 5′-GTACCACCGGACAGGACAGT-3′ | This study |
| MinKNOW 2.1 v18.05.5 | Oxford Nanopore Technology, UK | N/A |
| Albacore v2.3.1. | Oxford Nanopore Technology, UK | N/A |
| EPI2ME Agent Software | Oxford Nanopore Technology, UK | N/A |
| ranacapa R package | N/A | |
| MicrobiomeAnalyst Software | N/A | |
| Phyloseq R package | N/A | |
| R package microbiome | N/A | |
| Image Lab software v6.0.1 | Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA | N/A |
| Qubit 4.0 fluorometer | Invitrogen, USA | Cat#Q33226 |
| Gel Documentation System - Alpha Imager HP | Protein Simple, USA | Cat#921382400 |
| NanoVue Plus Spectrophotometer | GE Healthcare, UK | Cat#28-9232-15 |
| GridION X5 | Oxford Nanopore Technology, UK | Cat#GRD-X5B003 |
| SpotON flow cell R9.4 | Oxford Nanopore Technology, UK | Cat#FLO-MIN106D |
| BOD Incubator | Hicon Eminence, India | N/A |
| Veriti 96 well thermal cycler | Applied Biosystems, USA | Cat#4375786 |