| Literature DB >> 35754534 |
Xinglong Gong1,2, Min Zheng1,2, Jian Zhang1,2, Yourong Ye1,2, Mengqi Duan1,2, Yangzom Chamba1,2, Zhongbin Wang1,2, Peng Shang1,2.
Abstract
Fat deposition traits are one of the key factors in pig production and breeding. The fat deposition capacity of pigs mainly affects the quality of pork and pig productivity. The aim of this study was to analyze the differential expression of mRNA levels in dorsal adipose tissue of Tibetan and York pigs at different growth stages using transcriptomic data to estimate key genes that regulate fat deposition in pigs. The results showed that a total of 32,747 positively expressed genes were present in the dorsal adipose tissue of the two breeds. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) screening of multiple combinations between the two breeds yielded 324 DEGS. Gene ontology (GO) biofunctional enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses showed that these DEGS were mainly involved in lipid metabolic pathways, steroid biosynthetic pathways and lipid biosynthetic processes, sterol biosynthetic processes, brown adipocyte differentiation, and other pathways related to lipid deposition and metabolism. The results showed that ACACA, SLC2A4 and THRSP genes positively regulated the lipid deposition ability and CHPT1 gene negatively regulated the lipid deposition ability in pigs. The results of this experiment suggest a theoretical basis for further studies on the regulatory mechanisms of fat deposition in pigs.Entities:
Keywords: Tibetan pig; backfat; fat deposition; large white pig; transcriptomic
Year: 2022 PMID: 35754534 PMCID: PMC9218471 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.919904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). (A) Plot of correlation coefficient among samples. (B) Histogram of the number of DEGS statistics for difference comparison combinations. (C) The column diagrams for gene ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs, the X-axis represents the functions of GO analysis and the Y-axis represents the numbers of DEGs.
Figure 2Differential genetic Venn diagram.
Figure 3The column diagrams of top 20 Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analysis.
Figure 4Real-time PCR validation of the DEGs analyzed by RNA-seq. The *symbol indicates the significant difference (P < 0.05). The **symbol indicates extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).
Comparison of backfat thickness determination.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Tibetan pig | 21.27 ± 1.08a |
| York pigs | 16.41 ± 1.16b |
Correlation analysis between backfat thickness and various genes in York pigs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backfat thickness | 1 | |||||||
| IDI1 | 0.921** | 1 | ||||||
| ACACA | 0.935** | 0.959** | 1 | |||||
| ELOVL5 | 0.916** | 0.991** | 0.952** | 1 | ||||
| PLAC8 | 0.934** | 0.959** | 0.948** | 0.967** | 1 | |||
| SLC2A4 | 0.908** | 0.928** | 0.965** | 0.910** | 0.873* | 1 | ||
| THRSP | 0.884** | 0.915** | 0.967** | 0.918** | 0.915** | 0.970** | 1 | |
| CHPT1 | −0.928** | −0.889** | −0.885** | −0.890** | −0.955** | −0.855* | −0.898** | 1 |
The *symbol indicates the significant difference (P <0.05). The **symbol indicates extremely significant difference (P <0.01).
Correlation analysis between backfat thickness and various genes in Tibetan pigs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Backfat thickness | 1 | |||||||
| IDI1 | 0.741 | 1 | ||||||
| ACACA | 0.868** | 0.953 | 1 | |||||
| ELOVL5 | 0.823 | 0.700 | 0.930* | 1 | ||||
| PLAC8 | 0.766 | 0.999* | 0.964 | 0.727 | 1 | |||
| SLC2A4 | 0.890** | 0.706 | 0.991** | 0.830 | 0.732 | 1 | ||
| THRSP | 0.894** | 0.934 | 0.991** | 0.947* | 0.947 | 0.976** | 1 | |
| CHPT1 | −0.134 | −0.743 | −0.958* | −0.652 | −0.768 | −0.958* | −0.909* | 1 |
The *symbol indicates the significant difference (P <0.05). The **symbol indicates extremely significant difference (P <0.01).