Qingzhao Yu1, Mandi Yu2, Joe Zou3, Xiaocheng Wu4, Scarlett L Gomez5, Bin Li6. 1. Biostatistics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA. 2. Mathematical Statistician, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. 3. Information Management Services, Inc, Rockville, MD, USA. 4. Epidemiology, Louisiana Tumor Registry, New Orleans, LA, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA. 6. Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Abstract
Background: Third-variable effect refers to the effect from a third-variable that explains an observed relationship between an exposure and an outcome. Depending on whether there is a causal relationship from the exposure to the third variable, the third-variable is called a mediator or a confounder. The multilevel mediation analysis is used to differentiate third-variable effects from data of hierarchical structures. Data Collection and Analysis: We developed a multilevel mediation analysis method to deal with time-to-event outcomes and implemented the method in the mlma R package. With the method, third-variable effects from different levels of data can be estimated. The method uses multilevel additive models that allow for transformations of variables to take into account potential nonlinear relationships among variables in the mediation analysis. We apply the proposed method to explore the racial/ethnic disparities in survival among patients diagnosed with breast cancer in California between 2006 and 2017, using both individual risk factors and census tract level environmental factors. The individual risk factors are collected by cancer registries and the census tract level factors are collected by the Public Health Alliance of Southern California in partnership with the Virginia Commonwealth University's Center on Society and Health. The National Cancer Institute work group linked variables at the census tract level with each patient and performed the analysis for this study. Results: We found that the racial disparity in survival were mostly explained at the census tract level and partially explained at the individual level. The associations among variables were depicted. Conclusion: The multilevel mediation analysis method can be used to differentiate mediation/confounding effects for factors originated from different levels. The method is implemented in the R package mlma.
Background: Third-variable effect refers to the effect from a third-variable that explains an observed relationship between an exposure and an outcome. Depending on whether there is a causal relationship from the exposure to the third variable, the third-variable is called a mediator or a confounder. The multilevel mediation analysis is used to differentiate third-variable effects from data of hierarchical structures. Data Collection and Analysis: We developed a multilevel mediation analysis method to deal with time-to-event outcomes and implemented the method in the mlma R package. With the method, third-variable effects from different levels of data can be estimated. The method uses multilevel additive models that allow for transformations of variables to take into account potential nonlinear relationships among variables in the mediation analysis. We apply the proposed method to explore the racial/ethnic disparities in survival among patients diagnosed with breast cancer in California between 2006 and 2017, using both individual risk factors and census tract level environmental factors. The individual risk factors are collected by cancer registries and the census tract level factors are collected by the Public Health Alliance of Southern California in partnership with the Virginia Commonwealth University's Center on Society and Health. The National Cancer Institute work group linked variables at the census tract level with each patient and performed the analysis for this study. Results: We found that the racial disparity in survival were mostly explained at the census tract level and partially explained at the individual level. The associations among variables were depicted. Conclusion: The multilevel mediation analysis method can be used to differentiate mediation/confounding effects for factors originated from different levels. The method is implemented in the R package mlma.
Authors: Thomas R Ten Have; Marshall M Joffe; Kevin G Lynch; Gregory K Brown; Stephen A Maisto; Aaron T Beck Journal: Biometrics Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Erica T Warner; Rulla M Tamimi; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Ann H Partridge Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J W Eley; H A Hill; V W Chen; D F Austin; M N Wesley; H B Muss; R S Greenberg; R J Coates; P Correa; C K Redmond Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-09-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James L Dorling; Corby K Martin; Qingzhao Yu; Wentao Cao; Christoph Höchsmann; John W Apolzan; Robert L Newton; Kara D Denstel; Emily F Mire; Peter T Katzmarzyk Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 8.472