| Literature DB >> 35754493 |
Bin Lv1, Weikang Gan1, Zhangrong Cheng1, Juntao Wu1, Yuhang Chen1, Kangchen Zhao1, Yukun Zhang1.
Abstract
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), characterized by conversion of genotypic and phenotypic, is a major etiology of low back pain and disability. In general, this process starts with alteration of metabolic homeostasis leading to ongoing inflammatory process, extracellular matrix degradation and fibrosis, diminished tissue hydration, and impaired structural and mechanical functionality. During the past decades, extensive studies have focused on elucidating the molecular mechanisms of degeneration and shed light on the protective roles of various factors that may have the ability to halt and even reverse the IDD. Mutations of GDF-5 are associated with several human and animal diseases that are characterized by skeletal deformity such as short digits and short limbs. Growth and differentiation factor-5 (GDF-5) has been shown to be a promise biological therapy for IDD. Substantial literature has revealed that GDF-5 can decelerate the progression of IDD on the molecular, cellular, and organ level by altering prolonged imbalance between anabolism and catabolism. GDF family members are the central signaling moleculars in homeostasis of IVD and upregulation of their gene promotes the expression of healthy nucleus pulposus (NP) cell marker genes. In addition, GDF signaling is able to induce mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to differentiate into NPCs and mobilize resident cell populations as chemotactic signals. This review will discuss the promising critical role of GDF-5 in maintenance of structure and function of IVDs, and its therapeutic role in IDD endogenous repair.Entities:
Keywords: extracellular matrix; growth and differentiation factor (GDF); intervertebral disc degeneration; mesenchymal stem cell; nucleus pulposus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35754493 PMCID: PMC9213660 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.842525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Overview of IVDs structure and the cellular migration/directions during IVDs repair. (A) Avascular nature of the human IVDs. Reproduced from Rebecca et al.(Kritschil et al., 2021) with permission from Copyright 2021 Wiley. (B) Intervertebral disc stem cell niche and cells migrate to AF, the outer layer of collagen-rich fibers (COLL I). Cells migrate to the germinal region and interact with ECM along the alignment of collagen fibers. Moreover, the disorganization of collagen fibers and increasing of the interlamellar distances between collagen bundles in the annulus fibrosus were usually observed during the degeneration process that often results in disc bulging. Reproduced from Henriksson et al. (2015) with permission from Copyright 2015 Elsevier.
FIGURE 2The effect of GDF-based therapeutic cycle in IDD. The imbalance between synthesis and catabolism in normal IVDs and degenerate IVDs increase inflammation and alter ECM production. The processes accelerate increasing type I collagen and decreasing proteoglycan production, compromises tissue integrity, and cause NP herniation and CLBP. Moreover, injection of GDF has shown promise for readdressing the balance between catabolic and anabolic processes in the degenerate IVD, thereby restoring disc matrix integrity and function, and reducing pain. ECM, extracellular matrix; GDF, growth differentiation factor; IVD, intervertebral disc; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; NP, nucleus pulposus. Reproduced with permission (Hodgkinson et al., 2019). Copyright 2019, Wiley.
FIGURE 3The molecular mechanisms of low-grade inflammation in IVDJD and the crosstalk between intervertebral disc and subchondral bone. Reproduced from Eduardo et al. (Anitua and Padilla, 2018) with permission from Copyright 2018 Future Medicine.
Effect of GDF5 on MSCs in culture.
| GDF5 Concentration | Cell population | Culture duration | Culture conditions | Outcomes | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 μg/ml | hASCs | 28 Days | Pullulan microbeads | Promote cell recruitment and ECM remodelling |
|
| 100 ng/ml | hMSCs | 18 Days | 3D alginate bead | i) Up-regulate aggrecan and collagen II. |
|
| ii) Promote expression of aggrecan in relation to collagen | |||||
| 100 ng/ml | hACs and hMSCs | 21 days | GE-silk fleece | GE-silk scaffold thrive hMSC towards a NP-cell-like phenotype or maintain the phenotype of native hAFC. |
|
| 100 ng/ml | ADSCs | 14 days | PNIPAAM-g-CS | i) Hydrogel support NP regeneration |
|
| ii) PNIPAAM-g-CS supports the survival, proliferation, and differentiation of ADSCs toward an NP-cell-like phenotype | |||||
| 100 ng/ml | hACs and hMSCs | 4 weeks | 2D | i) Up-regulate chondrogenic gene expression in both hACs and hMSCs |
|
| ii) Induce the upregulation of chondrogenic genes and synthesis of cartilage-specific matrix | |||||
| iii) Yield mechanically robust cartilage rich in collagen II and GAGs | |||||
| 50–500 ng/ml | hMSCs | 21 Days | Pellet | i) Upregulate collagen II. |
|
| ii) Potential synergistic relationship with TGFβ1 in driving chondrogenic differentiation | |||||
| 10 ng/ml; 100 ng/ml; 1,000 ng/ml | AD-MSCs | 14 Days | type I collagen hydrogels | i) Differentiate to an NP-like phenotype and results in a more proteoglycan-rich matrix |
|
| ii) GDF6-treated AD-MSCs have a less-stiff matrix composition | |||||
| iii) Induce a matrix that is more akin to the native NP-like tissue | |||||
| 100 ng/ml | hMSCs | Up to 7 Days | HA-pNIPAM | Support hMSC differente toward the disc phenotype |
|
FIGURE 4Delivery of GDF-5 with functionalized scaffolds and their role in IVDs repair. The combined impact of GDF-5 and pore alignment can drive MSCs differentiate towards the desired NP cells phenotypes for IDD repair. Engineered scaffolds guide spatial positioning of GDF-5 at specific regions and the temporal control of quantal growth factors release. The delivery of GDF-5 enhanced the expression of markers and collagen II protein content on substrates with isotropic porosity. Reproduced from Font Tellado et al. (2018) with permission from Copyright 2018 Elsevier.