| Literature DB >> 35754483 |
Wenjun He1,2,3, Yanming Wang1,2,4, Rui Yang1,2,4, Huihui Ma1,2,4, Xuqing Qin1,2,4, Meijuan Yan1,2,3, Yi Rong1,2,4, Yufang Xie1,2,4, Li Li1, Junqiang Si1,2,4, Xinzhi Li1,2,3, Ketao Ma1,2,4.
Abstract
Although the protective effects of naringenin (Nar) on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) have been confirmed, whether it has anti-proliferation and anti-migration effects in high-glucose-induced VSMCs has remained unclear. This study aimed to clarify the potential targets and molecular mechanism of Nar when used to treat high-glucose-induced vasculopathy based on transcriptomics, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and in vivo and in vitro assays. We found that Nar has visible anti-proliferation and anti-migration effects both in vitro (high-glucose-induced VSMC proliferation and migration model) and in vivo (type 1 diabetes mouse model). Based on the results of network pharmacology and molecular docking, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), the proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (Src) and the kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) are the core targets of Nar when used to treat diabetic angiopathies, according to the degree value and the docking score of the three core genes. Interestingly, not only the Biological Process (BP), Molecular Function (MF), and KEGG enrichment results from network pharmacology analysis but also transcriptomics showed that phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt) is the most likely downstream pathway involved in the protective effects of Nar on VSMCs. Notably, according to the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the transcriptomic analysis, we found that cAMP-responsive element binding protein 5 (CREB5) is a downstream protein of the PI3K/Akt pathway that participates in VSMCs proliferation and migration. Furthermore, the results of molecular experiments in vitro were consistent with the bioinformatic analysis. Nar significantly inhibited the protein expression of the core targets (VEGFA, Src and KDR) and downregulated the PI3K/Akt/CREB5 pathway. Our results indicated that Nar exerted anti-proliferation and anti-migration effects on high-glucose-induced VSMCs through decreasing expression of the target protein VEGFA, and then downregulating the PI3K/Akt/CREB5 pathway, suggesting its potential for treating diabetic angiopathies.Entities:
Keywords: diabetic angiopathies; molecular docking; naringenin; network pharmacology; transcriptomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35754483 PMCID: PMC9219407 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.862709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Protective effect of Nar against diabetic angiopathies in vivo. (A) HE staining of thoracic aorta from diverse groups of mice. (B) Bar graph of media thickness of aorta in diverse groups. (C) Bar graph of lumen diameter of aorta in diverse groups (D) Bar graph of HE staining analysis the ratio of media thickness/lumen diameter in aorta. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared with Control group, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, compared with HG group. (E) Representative images of Masson’s staining of the aorta (magnification: 400×).
FIGURE 2(A) Nar inhibited diabetes induced VSMCs’ proliferation, migration and phenotype switching in vivo. Immunohistochemical analysis of PCNA, MMP2, and MMP9 expression in the aorta in diverse groups (magnification: 400×). (B) Immunofluorescence staining of α-SMA and OPN expression in diverse groups of mice.
FIGURE 3Nar inhibited high-glucose-induced VSMC proliferation. (A) CCK-8 assay showed that Nar reduced the viability of high-glucose-induced VSMCs at 24 and 48 h, p < 0.05. (B,C) Flow cytometry showed a lower cell proliferation rate in the Nar group than in the HG group. (D) Immunofluorescent staining of PCNA (magnification: 200×). (E,F) Western blot analysis showed PCNA expression associated with different treatments of VSMCs, * p < 0.05 compared with Control group, ## p < 0.01 compared with HG group.
FIGURE 4Nar inhibited high-glucose-induced VSMC migration. (A,B) Wound healing assay of VSMC migration at 12, 24, and 48 h (magnification: 40×). (C,D) Transwell migration assay of Control group, HG group, and groups with diverse doses of Nar (magnification: 200×). (E–G) Western blot analysis of MMP2 and MMP9 expression. ** p < 0.01 compared with Control group, ## p < 0.01 compared with HG group.
FIGURE 5Nar abrogated high-glucose-induced VSMC dedifferentiation. (A,B) Immunofluorescent staining of α-SMA and OPN (magnification: 200×). (C–E) Western blot analysis of α-SMA and OPN expression. * p < 0.05 compared with Control group, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with HG group.
FIGURE 6Results of network pharmacology analysis. (A) Venn diagram shows the number of common targets between Nar and diabetic angiopathies. (B) Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the common targets according to degree value analyzed by Cytoscape software. (C) GO enrichment (BP) analysis of network pharmacology. (D) GO enrichment (MF) analysis of network pharmacology. (E) Top 20 most enriched KEGG categories for the common targets shows the vital Nar-related signaling pathway against diabetic angiopathies according to network pharmacology analysis.
FIGURE 7Results of transcriptomic sequencing and data analysis (A) A volcano plot indicates the mRNA expression profile of the Nar group vs the HG group. (B) Heatmap shows the clustering of mRNAs between the Nar and HG groups of VSMCs. Up- and downregulated genes are colored in red and blue, respectively. (C) GO enrichment (BP) analysis of transcriptomic analysis. (D) GO enrichment (MF) analysis of transcriptomic analysis. (E) Top 20 most enriched KEGG categories for the downregulated genes shows the vital Nar-related signaling pathway against diabetic angiopathies according to transcriptomic analysis.
LibDock analysis of core targets bound with different molecules.
| Target | PDB | LibDock score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naringenin | Cognate ligand | Inhibitor | ||
| VEGFA | 1VPP | 98.7813 | 99.4048 | 117.326 |
| Src | 5XP7 | 104.866 | 128.602 | 111.639 |
| KDR | 3VHK | 111.412 | 120.848 | 121.494 |
FIGURE 8Molecular docking. (A-C) 3D docking for Nar in the active binding pocket of VEGFA, Src and KDR. (a-c) 2D interaction patterns between Nar and VEGFA, Src and KDR.
FIGURE 9Nar down-regulated the expression of core target VEGFA and PI3K/Akt/CREB5 signaling pathway. (A) Western blot detected the protein expression of VEGFA. (B) Analysis of VEGFA protein expression. (C) Analysis of VEGFA mRNA expression. (D,E) Nar suppressed KDR, p-Src, p-PI3K, p-Akt and CREB5 expression which upregulated by HG group. (F) Bar graph showed related protein expression analysis. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with Control group, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with HG group.