Potential roles of serum ATPase and AMPase in predicting diagnosis of colorectal cancer patients.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common gastrointestinal cancer with high incidence and mortality rates. CRC may be associated with regulation of circulating nucleotides. This study aimed to evaluate the serum levels of nucleotide-metabolizing enzymes (ATPase and AMPase) in patients with CRC and to explore the clinical diagnostic value of these enzymes. The gene set variation analysis (GSVA) score of the ATP-adenosine signature was calculated using tumor samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). ATP-adenosine signaling plays a central role in CRC progression. A total of 135 subjects, including 87 patients with CRC and 48 healthy controls, were included. The serum levels of ATPase and AMPase in the CRC group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, ATP and AMP hydrolysis levels significantly increased in the advanced CRC group (P < 0.05). ATP and AMP hydrolysis was decreased by the ENTPDase inhibitors (POM-1 and ARL67156) and CD73 inhibitor (APCP). The sensitivities of ATPase and AMPase were 95.4% and 75.9%, respectively, which were higher than those of CEA (67.8%) and CA19-9 (72.4%). The specificities of ATPase and AMPase were 69.9% and 73.9%, respectively, which were higher than that of CA19-9 (47.8%). The combination of CEA, ATPase, and AMPase demonstrated high sensitivity (92.0%) and specificity (87.0%). Collectively, ATPase and AMPase activities are upregulated in CRC with considerable diagnostic significance. The combination of CEA, ATPase, and AMPase may provide a novel approach for CRC screening.

Research highlights

ATP-adenosine signaling play a central role in CRC. The serum samples of CRC patients presented an elevated ATP and AMP hydrolysis. ENTPDase and CD73 are responsible for the ATPase and AMPase activity in the serum of CRC patients. ATPase and AMPase are promising biomarkers in CRC detection.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common gastrointestinal cancer across the globe [1]. The incidence and mortality rates of CRC rank fifth among all cancers in China [2]; therefore, a new approach that can improve the current methods for CRC screening is urgently needed. Currently, colonoscopy is considered the gold standard tool for CRC detection; however, invasive procedures and complications preclude its widespread implementation [3]. Compared to colonoscopy, blood-based tumor biomarkers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9), are widely used because they are noninvasive but show unsatisfactory performance [4]. Therefore, investigations of novel biomarkers, especially blood-based biomarkers for the early diagnosis of CRC, are highly warranted.

Extracellular nucleosides (adenosine) and nucleotides (ATP, ADP, AMP, etc.) act as signaling molecules that mediate diverse biological effects [5]. Regulation of the ATP-adenosine pathway is important in biological nucleotide-mediated signaling processes. This regulation is exerted by a series of ecto-enzymes that hydrolyze nucleotides and consequently generate their metabolites [6]. These ecto-enzymes include the ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase family (ENTPDases) and 5′-nucleotidase(CD73).

Adenosine, a metabolite of nucleotides, plays a central role in tumor escape from the immune system that depends on the cell surface adenosine receptors (A1R, A2AR, A2BR, and A3R) [7]. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), high concentrations of adenosine exert profound immunosuppressive effects on CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, B cells, dendritic cells, and NK cells through high-affinity A2AR [8]. In addition, adenosine can promote proliferation, metastasis, and invasion of tumor cells by interacting with adenosine receptors [9]. Upregulation of ATPase and AMPase (such as ENTPDases and CD73) in several tumors has been associated with poor clinical outcomes [10-13]. In addition, microvesicles derived from many types of tumor cells can establish an immunosuppressive environment through the generation of adenosine from ATP and AMP hydrolysis [14]. Several studies have demonstrated the presence of soluble ATPase and AMPase in the human blood [15].

Considering the fact that adenosine and nucleotide enzymes play an important role in the development of tumors, the aim of our study was to determine ATPase and AMPase activities in the serum of patients with CRC. In addition, we compared the diagnostic efficacy of ATPase and AMPase to traditional blood-based tumor biomarkers and their combinations among these biomarkers.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Adenosine-5′triphosphate (ATP, #A6419-1 g), adenosine-5′monophosphate (AMP, #A2252-5 G), ARL67156 (inhibitor of ENTPDases, #A265-5 mg), Malachite Green (#MAK307-1KT), trichloroacetic acid (TCA, #T6399-5 G) and Tris–HCl were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (USA).

POM-1 (inhibitor of ENTPDases, #2689/50) and α-β-methylene-ADP (APCP; inhibitor of CD73, #3633/10) was purchased from Tocris Bioscience (USA).

Analysis of gene expression

Our proposed signature consisted of 14 genes associated with adenosine signaling; this signature was obtained from Sidders et al. [16]. We scored transcriptome data with the adenosine signature using gene set variation analysis (GSVA, and then calculated the GSVA score using the samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Boxplots were generated for the adenosine signature score across various tumors. We also used a published dataset (GSE39582, 562 patients with CRC) to investigate the clinical value of ATPase and AMPase pathway scores.

Human blood samples

All blood samples were collected at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Only subjects who simultaneously underwent CEA and CA19-9 examinations were enrolled, and those who received therapy were excluded from our study. Ultimately, 135 subjects were included: 87 patients with CRC and 48 healthy volunteers (without intestinal system diseases). The use of blood samples was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen University (approval number 2022ZSLYEC-24). Healthy volunteers were selected based on their clinical parameters to match patients with CRC to the greatest extent possible. The sample size was estimated to be able to show the levels of serum biomarkers of CRC patients compared to healthy controls with at least 80% power (1 – β = 0.8) at a significance level of α = 0.05 (2-sided).

Peripheral blood samples (3 mL) were obtained from healthy controls and patients, and stored in plastic tubes without anticoagulant. For blood serum isolation, samples were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 12 min. The resultant serum samples were stored at −80°C, and subsequently used for the analysis of enzyme activity.

Nucleotide hydrolysis evaluation

In accordance with Oses et al. [17], the nucleotide (ATP and AMP) hydrolysis rates were determined using the malachite green method with slight modifications. The reaction mixture containing 3.0 mM ATP as substrate and 120 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), was incubated with blood samples at 37°C in a final volume of 200 µL [17]. After 50 min, the reaction was stopped by adding 10% TCA and subsequently chilled on ice. The samples were then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to eliminate the precipitated material, and the supernatant was used for the next colourimetric assay. AMP hydrolysis was evaluated using an approach similar to that described previously. The reaction system containing AMP as a substrate (final concentration of 3 mM) and 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) was incubated with blood samples, and the other steps were the same as those described above for ATP hydrolysis.

In addition, in accordance with Jiang et al. [15], specific enzymatic inhibitions were performed where POM-1 and ARL67156 were used to evaluate ENTPDases at final concentrations of 5 μM and 80 μM, respectively, and APCP was used to evaluate CD73 at 30 μM. These enzymatic inhibitors were added to the reaction system during the pre-incubation period and incubated with blood samples for 50 min. The absorbance of the mixture was measured using a Thermo Scientific Varioskan Flash spectral scanning multimode reader (Thermo scientific, USA) set at 620 nm. Plot OD620 nm versus phosphate standard concentrations. Then determine blood sample phosphate concentrations from the standard curve. ATPase and AMPase levels were determined as nmol Pi/min/mg protein. All samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0. The differences in ATPase, AMPase, CEA, and CA19-9 levels were assessed using Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The diagnostic efficacy of ATPase and AMPase was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC). The cutoff value was considered the value with the maximization of the Youden index. Sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the diagnostic value of ATPase, AMPase, CEA, and CA19-9. A logistic regression model was fitted to combine the diagnostic performance of the biomarkers (CEA, ATPase, and AMPase). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The relationship between extracellular nucleotides (ATP and AMP) and CRC has already been described in previous studies, but the roles of ATPase and AMPase in CRC have not been thoroughly studied.Therefore, the present study aimed to determine ATPase and AMPase activity in the serum of patients with CRC and the clinical value of these enzymes combined with tumor biomarkers in the diagnosis of CRC.

ATP-adenosine signaling levels in individual tumor types

To investigate the role of nucleosides (adenosine) in tumor pathogenesis, we determined the ATP-adenosine signaling profile of individual tumor types obtained from TCGA. As shown in Figure 1, all 32 cancer types exhibited a wide range of ATP-adenosine signaling levels, and some tumor types had high signaling levels. The highest levels of adenosine signaling were observed in renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), CRC, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD). Consistent with our observations, ATP-adenosine signaling is known to play a key role in these tumors, where it regulates a variety of biological functions and is highly dynamic [18-20]. We next studied the clinical association of ATPase and AMPase pathways with CRC in the GSE39582 dataset. The four-gene (ENTPD1, ENTPD2, ALPP, NT5E) score reflecting ATPase and AMPase activity in the CRC tissues was higher than that in the normal tissues (Figure 2(a), p < 0.05). Furthermore, the high four-gene-score group was significantly associated with worse overall survival in the GSE39582 dataset (Figure 2(b), p < 0.05).

Figure 1.

ATP-adenosine signaling levels vary across tumor types of TCGA.

Figure 2.

Association of the four-gene score with CRC in the GSE39582 dataset. (a) Violin plot of four-gene (ENTPD1, ENTPD2, ALPP, NT5E) score in normal tissues and CRC tissues (P < 0.05). (b) Kaplan–Meier survival plot of comparison between low four-gene score and high four-gene-score groups for overall survival (P < 0.05).

Considering the fact that ATP-adenosine signaling plays a central role in the physiology of CRC, our next study will focus on ATPase and AMPase activities in the serum of patients with CRC.

Baseline characteristics of the patients

A total of 135 subjects (87 patients in the CRC group) with a mean age of 57 (32–66) years were enrolled in the study. The control group consisted of 48 healthy participants with a mean age of 50 (35–73) years. The clinical characteristics of the CRC patients are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical and pathological data of CRC patients.

Characteristics	N	%
Sex
Male	58	66.7
Female	29	33.3
Age(years)
<60	64	73.6
≥60	23	26.4
Colon
Ascending colon	3	3.4
Transverse colon	3	3.4
Descending colon	4	4.6
Sigmoid colon	17	19.6
Rectum	44	50.6
Colon, unspecified	16	18.4
Tumor stage
Stage I+II	40	46.0
Stage III+Ⅳ	47	54.0
T classification
T1+ T2	16	18.4
T3+ T4	71	81.6
N classification
No	26	29.9
Yes	61	70.1
Metastasis
No	65	74.7
Yes	22	25.3
Vascular and neural infiltration
No	37	42.5
Yes	50	57.5

In the CRC group, the most common tumor site was the rectum (50.6%, 44/87), followed by the sigmoid colon (19.6%, 17/87), descending colon (4.6%, 4/87), ascending colon (3.4%, 3/87), transverse colon (3.4%, 3/87), and colon unspecified (18.4%, 16/87). The number of patients in stage I + II and stage III + IV CRC were 40 (46.0%) and 47 (54.0%), respectively. Patients in T1 + T2 and T3 + T4 stages were 16 (18.4%) and 71 (81.6%), respectively. In addition, 61 (70.1%), 22 (25.3%), and 50 (57.5%) patients with CRC had lymph node metastases, distant metastasis, and vascular and neural infiltration, respectively.

Quantitation of human ATPase and AMPase activity in the serum

The results of biomarker levels (CEA, CA19-9, ATPase, and AMPase) in the serum of patients in the CRC and control groups are shown in Figure 3. The serum concentrations of CEA and CA19-9 were significantly higher in the CRC group than in the control group (P < 0.05; Figure 3(a, b)). The level of ATPase was 1.68 (1.12–2.86) nmol Pi/min/mg of protein in the CRC group, significantly higher than that in the control group [1.22 (0.76–1.99) nmol Pi/min/mg] (P < 0.05, Figure 3(c)). Furthermore, the AMP hydrolysis rate was significantly higher in the CRC group (1.56 ± 0.35) nmol Pi/min/mg when compared to the control group (1.24 ± 0.31) nmol of Pi/min/mg (P < 0.05, Figure 3(d)).

Figure 3.

Levels of serum biomarkers in CRC patients and healthy controls. Levels of serum CEA (a), CA19-9 (b), ATPase (c) and AMPase (d) were elevated in 87 CRC patients compared with 48 healthy controls (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001).

Focusing on patients with CRC, the mean ATPase level was 1.79 (1.20–2.26) nmol Pi/min/mg in the advanced CRC group (Stage I + II, n = 47), higher than that in the early CRC group (Stage I + II, n = 40) [1.60 (1.20–2.26) nmol Pi/min/mg] (P < 0.05, Figure 4(a)). Similar to ATPase, AMPase levels were significantly increased in patients with advanced stage III + IV disease (P < 0.05, Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4.

Serum ATPase and AMPase levels are increased in advanced CRC patients. (a, b) The serum ATPase and AMPase levels were upregulated in 47 advanced CRC patients compared with 40 early CRC patients (*P < 0.05).

Furthermore, to identify the enzymes responsible for ATP and AMP hydrolysis in the serum of patients, we performed an incubation test in the presence of inhibitors. We used POM-1 and ARL67156 (inhibitors of ENTPDases) at final concentrations of 5 μM and 80 μM, respectively, and APCP (an inhibitor of CD73) at a final concentration of 30 μM. As shown in Figure 5(a), the presence of POM-1 and ARL67156 resulted in a significant decrease in ATPase activity. In contrast, APCP significantly reduced AMPase activity, reflecting the involvement of CD73 in AMP hydrolysis (Figure 5(b)).

Figure 5.

Effect of specific inhibitors of ENTPDases and CD73 on ATPase and AMPase levels in CRC patients. (a) Effect of specific inhibitors of ENTPDases (ARL67153 and POM-1) on ATP hydrolysis (***P < 0.001). (b) Effect of specific inhibitor of CD73 (APCP) on AMP hydrolysis (***P < 0.001).

Individual diagnostic value of indicators in CRC

To evaluate the diagnostic value of ATPase and AMPase, we plotted ROC curves and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of indicators (ATPase, AMPase, CEA, and CA19-9). As shown in Figure 6, the AUCs of ATPase, AMPase, and CEA were 0.839 (95% CI: 0.762–0.917), 0.769 (95% CI: 0.680–0.859), and 0.869 (95% CI: 0.811–0.926), respectively, whereas the AUC for CA19-9 was only 0.633 (95% CI: 0.535–0.730).

Figure 6.

ROC curves of using CEA, CA19-9, ATPase and AMPase alone in CRC patients.

The sensitivity and specificity of the indicators are summarized in Table 2. CEA was able to diagnose CRC with the highest specificity (93.5%) and relatively high sensitivity (67.8%). The sensitivities of ATPase and AMPase were 95.4% and 75.9%, respectively, which were higher than those of CEA (67.8%) and CA19-9 (72.4%). The specificities of ATPase and AMPase were 69.9% and 73.9%, respectively, higher than that of CA19-9 (47.8%).

Table 2.

The diagnosis value of individual indicator in CRC detection.

Markers	AUC	Standard error	95%CI	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)
CEA	0.869	0.029	0.811–0.926	67.8	93.5
CA19-9	0.633	0.050	0.535–0.730	72.4	47.8
ATPase	0.839	0.040	0.762–0.917	95.4	69.9
AMPase	0.769	0.045	0.680–0.859	75.9	73.9

AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA, carbohydrate antigen.

Combined diagnostic value of ATPase, AMPase, CEA, and CA19-9 levels in CRC

Next, we assessed the diagnostic value of CEA in combination with CA19-9, ATPase, and AMPase in CRC. As shown in Figure 7 and Table 3, the overall AUCs increased when combined with ATPase/AMPase. The combination of ATPase and AMPase with CEA achieved the highest AUC value of 0.956 (95% CI, 0.918–0.986). Among the combined indicators, CEA + ATPase + AMPase showed improved sensitivity (92.0%) compared with CEA + CA19-9 (69.0%). The combination of CEA, ATPase, and AMPase also demonstrated high specificity (87.0%). The results showed that ATPase and AMPase levels could act as promising biomarkers for CRC.

Figure 7.

ROC curves of using CEA, CA19-9, ATPase and AMPase in combination in CRC patients.

Table 3.

The diagnosis value of CEA, CA19-9, ATPase and AMPase in combination to diagnose CRC.

Markers	AUC	Standard error	95%CI	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)
CEA	0.869	0.029	0.811–0.926	67.8	93.5
CEA + CA19-9	0.893	0.027	0.841–0.945	69.0	93.5
CEA + ATPase	0.940	0.020	0.901–0.978	94.3	80.4
CEA + AMPase	0.933	0.021	0.893–0.974	97.7	73.9
CEA + ATPase + AMPase	0.956	0.017	0.918–0.986	92.0	87.0

AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA, carbohydrate antigen.

Discussion

CRC is a common digestive tract malignancy with a high incidence and mortality rate, and early diagnosis is crucial for the health examination population [21,22]. Investigations of novel biomarkers, especially blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis of CRC, are highly warranted because liquid biopsy is convenient and minimally invasive [23]. Currently, CEA is the most widely used blood-based biomarker in the clinical practice for CRC [24,25]. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these traditional biomarkers (CEA and CA19-9) remain low for CRC, highlighting the urgent need to explore novel biomarkers to aid diagnosis [26].

It is well known that ATP and adenosine are fundamental components of the tumor microenvironment, where they affect diverse biological processes, such as apoptosis, tumor growth, and immune cell functions [27,28]. Our data showed that ATP-adenosine signaling levels were high in CRC. Tumor cells and immune cells express extracellular nucleosides (adenosine) and nucleotides (ATP, ADP, AMP, etc.) [29]. In some instances, enzymes involved in the hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides have become reliable indicators for monitoring disease [30,31]. These enzymes include members of the ENTPD family, which hydrolyze ATP into AMP, and CD73, which hydrolyses AMP to adenosine [32]. We then demonstrated that serum samples from patients with CRC presented higher ATPase and AMPase activities than those from healthy controls, showing that this gastrointestinal malignancy promotes changes in nucleotide metabolism and produces high levels of circulating adenosine. In the tumor microenvironment, adenosine promotes immunosuppression and cancer cell proliferation. ATPase and AMPase are synchronized to promote a pro-tumoral niche [33]. ENTPDase and CD73 are required to maintain the stability of the tumor environment by hydrolyzing ATP and AMP. The critical roles of ENTPDase and CD73 in tumors have been confirmed in many studies [34-36]. For instance, the plasma concentrations and activity of CD39 (ENTPD1) in patients with cervical cancer play an important role in the progression of tumors and may be valuable markers. In addition, AMPase activity in the serum of patients with advanced melanoma has been attributed to CD73, which has been suggested as a blood-based biomarker for metastatic melanoma [35]. Moreover, increased levels of soluble CD73 activity have been found in serum samples of patients with other types of tumors [35,36]. In this study, elevated ATP and AMP hydrolysis was observed in the serum samples of patients with CRC. We found that ATPase activity could be altered by ENTPDase inhibitors (POM-1 and ARL67156), suggesting a role of ENTPDases. In addition, AMPase activity was reduced in the presence of a CD73 inhibitor (APCP), so we can conclude that soluble CD73 is responsible for the activity of AMPase.

Furthermore, to elucidate the involvement of nucleotide (ATP and AMP) degradation in CRC, we analyzed the activity of ATPase and AMPase in patients divided into early and advanced groups. In CRC patients with advanced stages, we observed enhanced ATP and AMP hydrolysis, which supports the view that ATPase and AMPase activity is increased during tumor progression, in line with previous studies [37]. The serum levels of ATPase and AMPase may complement the diagnostic value of other biomarkers to guide the early diagnosis of CRC.

Highly convenient, sensitive, and specific biomarkers are required for the early diagnosis of CRC [38,39]. Serum CEA and CA19-9 are traditional biomarkers used across a variety of cancers and are commonly used to diagnose and monitor CRC. In this study, the AUC for serum CEA was 0.869, which is similar to the previous studies [40]. We found that the combination of ATPase and AMPase with traditional biomarker (CEA) further improved the AUC value and overall sensitivity. Taken together, our findings indicate that the common biomarker CEA combined with ATPase and AMPase could be a better test to diagnose CRC than when used alone.

The limitations of our study must be mentioned. First, further investigations with larger sample sizes in other populations are required. Second, our study focused on the diagnostic value of ATPase and AMPase in CRC detection, but the association between these enzymes and the prognosis of CRC patients is not included here; therefore, further study is needed.

Conclusions

In conclusion, ATPase and AMPase achieved high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values. The combination of ATPase and AMPase with CEA further improved the sensitivity. In addition to the advantages of minimal invasiveness and convenience, ATPase and AMPase are promising biomarkers for CRC detection. The combined use of ATPase and AMPase with traditional biomarkers could improve the diagnostic performance among CRC patients with CRC, which may provide a novel approach for CRC screening.

Click here for additional data file.