Literature DB >> 35752722

Surgical management of sacral schwannomas: a 21-year mayo clinic experience and comparative literature analysis.

William Mualem1,2, Abdul-Karim Ghaith1,2, Deja Rush1,2, Ryan Jarrah1,2, Yohan Alexander1,2, Cameron Zamanian1,2, John L D Atkinson2, Michael J Yaszemski3, William E Krauss2, Robert J Spinner2, Mohamad Bydon4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sacral and presacral schwannomas are rare, accounting for a minority of spinal schwannomas. We present our institution's experience surgically treating spinal schwannomas and compare it to the literature.
METHODS: Data were collected for 27 patients treated surgically for sacral or presacral schwannoma between 1997 and 2018 at all Mayo Clinic locations and 93 patients in the literature. Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival analysis was conducted. Unpaired two-sample t tests and Fisher's exact tests assessed statistical significance between groups.
RESULTS: Our patients and those in the literature experienced a similar age at diagnosis (49.9 y/o. vs 43.4 y/o., respectively). Most of our patients (59.3%) reported full recovery from symptoms, while a minority reported partial recovery (33.3%) and no recovery (11.1%). A smaller percentage in the literature experienced full recovery (31.9%) and partial recovery (29.8%) but also no recovery (1.1%). Our patients experienced fewer complications (14.8% versus 25.5%). Disease-free survival curves for all patients showed no significant variation in progression by extent of resection of schwannoma (log-rank P = 0.26). No lesion progression was associated with full or partial symptom improvement (p = 0.044), and female patients were more likely to undergo resection via a posterior approach (p = 0.042).
CONCLUSION: Outcomes of patients with sacral or presacral schwannomas vary based on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, symptoms, and surgical treatment. Among the range of symptoms experienced by these patients, the most common is pain. Prognosis improves and overall survival is high when the surgical approach towards sacral schwannomas is prepared and executed appropriately.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome; Presacral; Sacral; Schwannoma; Surgical management

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35752722     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-03986-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.506


  10 in total

1.  Incidentally diagnosed giant invasive sacral schwannoma. Its clinical features and surgical management without stability.

Authors:  Guray Togral; Murat Arikan; Askin E Hasturk; Safak Gungor
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.906

Review 2.  Giant Sacral Schwannoma Causing Bilateral Hydronephrosis: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alican Tahta; Cem Dinc; Yasar Ozdenkaya; Asli Cakir
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Sacral schwannoma with intraosseous extension.

Authors:  Carlos Dias Silva; José Eduardo Mateus; Joana Oliveira Silva; Teresa Vaio
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-01-22

4.  The neuroimaging and clinical spectrum of neurofibromatosis 2.

Authors:  V F Mautner; M Lindenau; M E Baser; W Hazim; M Tatagiba; W Haase; M Samii; R Wais; S M Pulst
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Management of presacral schwannomas-a 10-year multi-institutional series.

Authors:  Zach Pennington; Clemens Reinshagen; A Karim Ahmed; Sean Barber; Matthew L Goodwin; Ziya Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-05

Review 6.  Perineal and Radicular Pain Caused by Contralateral Sacral Nerve Root Schwannoma: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jael E Camacho; M Farooq Usmani; Cheng-Ying Ho; Charles A Sansur; Steven C Ludwig
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Surgery of spinal nerve schwannoma. Risk of neurological deficit after resection of involved root.

Authors:  P Kim; M J Ebersold; B M Onofrio; L M Quast
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Surgical management of giant sacral schwannomas.

Authors:  C D Abernathey; B M Onofrio; B Scheithauer; P C Pairolero; T C Shives
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Giant sacral schwannoma: a report of six cases.

Authors:  Chanplakorn Pongsthorn; Hiroshi Ozawa; Toshimi Aizawa; Takashi Kusakabe; Takeshi Nakamura; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.384

10.  Complexities of abdominoperineal surgery: synchronous resection of an ano-rectal adenocarcinoma and pelvic schwannoma.

Authors:  Ryan P C Higgin; Michael A Glaysher; Bashir A Zeidan; Andrew J G Miles
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-01-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.