Lena Mottie1, Greet Hens2,3, Jeroen Meulemans2,4, Vincent Vander Poorten2,4. 1. Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. lena.mottie@student.kuleuven.be. 2. Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Section Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Section Head and Neck Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This long-term follow-up study aims to externally validate the inside-out technique for surgical treatment of preauricular sinuses. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of all patients who underwent the IO procedure at University Hospitals Leuven from 1 November 2005 to 30 November 2019 (N = 110). We were able to contact 77 of these 110 patients for a telephone interview, where we used a standardized questionnaire to evaluate recurrence, patient satisfaction and aesthetic result. RESULTS: We studied 110 patients (68 males, 77 females), resulting in 145 PAS (35 left, 40 right, 35 bilateral), with a median follow-up of 53 months. Fifteen PAS (10.3%) developed an early (< 4 weeks) postoperative complication (wound dehiscence, infection, abcedation, swelling). Two PAS (2 different patients) needed revision surgery because of recurrence, one after 15 months, the other after 4 years. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free percentage was 97.7%, equating to an estimated recurrence rate of 2.3%. Ninety-four percent was satisfied with the aesthetic result, giving 4 or 5 points on a 5-point Likert scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to externally validate the IO technique for the treatment of PAS. The IO technique should be first choice, since it guarantees low recurrence rates, excellent aesthetic results, and good patient satisfaction.
PURPOSE: This long-term follow-up study aims to externally validate the inside-out technique for surgical treatment of preauricular sinuses. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of all patients who underwent the IO procedure at University Hospitals Leuven from 1 November 2005 to 30 November 2019 (N = 110). We were able to contact 77 of these 110 patients for a telephone interview, where we used a standardized questionnaire to evaluate recurrence, patient satisfaction and aesthetic result. RESULTS: We studied 110 patients (68 males, 77 females), resulting in 145 PAS (35 left, 40 right, 35 bilateral), with a median follow-up of 53 months. Fifteen PAS (10.3%) developed an early (< 4 weeks) postoperative complication (wound dehiscence, infection, abcedation, swelling). Two PAS (2 different patients) needed revision surgery because of recurrence, one after 15 months, the other after 4 years. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free percentage was 97.7%, equating to an estimated recurrence rate of 2.3%. Ninety-four percent was satisfied with the aesthetic result, giving 4 or 5 points on a 5-point Likert scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study was able to externally validate the IO technique for the treatment of PAS. The IO technique should be first choice, since it guarantees low recurrence rates, excellent aesthetic results, and good patient satisfaction.