PURPOSE: Midostaurin, approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed, FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Midostaurin with concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors use (e.g., antifungal azoles) may result in drug-drug interactions. This post hoc analysis of RATIFY phase 3 study data evaluated effects of strong CYP3A4 inhibitor use on the exposure and safety of midostaurin. METHODS: Trough concentrations were used to assess midostaurin and metabolite exposure in the presence and absence of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. Adverse event (AE) frequency was assessed in patients who received concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors vs those who did not. Time to first clinically notable AE (CNAE) was also assessed in patients with high midostaurin plasma exposure vs those of matched placebo controls. RESULTS: Use of concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors was most frequent during the induction phase (60.8%). A 1.44-fold increase in midostaurin plasma exposure was observed in patients with concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitor use vs those without. Midostaurin-treated patients who received concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors experienced grade 3/4 infection-related AEs more frequently vs those who did not. Patients with high levels of midostaurin exposure had a shorter median time to first grade 3/4 CNAE vs placebo controls (36 vs 41 days, respectively; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Although concomitantly administered strong CYP3A4 inhibitors increased midostaurin exposure 1.44-fold, no clinically relevant differences in safety were noted. Midostaurin dose adjustment is not necessary with concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors in patients with FLT3-mutated AML; however, caution is advised, and patients should be closely monitored.
PURPOSE: Midostaurin, approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed, FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Midostaurin with concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors use (e.g., antifungal azoles) may result in drug-drug interactions. This post hoc analysis of RATIFY phase 3 study data evaluated effects of strong CYP3A4 inhibitor use on the exposure and safety of midostaurin. METHODS: Trough concentrations were used to assess midostaurin and metabolite exposure in the presence and absence of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. Adverse event (AE) frequency was assessed in patients who received concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors vs those who did not. Time to first clinically notable AE (CNAE) was also assessed in patients with high midostaurin plasma exposure vs those of matched placebo controls. RESULTS: Use of concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors was most frequent during the induction phase (60.8%). A 1.44-fold increase in midostaurin plasma exposure was observed in patients with concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitor use vs those without. Midostaurin-treated patients who received concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors experienced grade 3/4 infection-related AEs more frequently vs those who did not. Patients with high levels of midostaurin exposure had a shorter median time to first grade 3/4 CNAE vs placebo controls (36 vs 41 days, respectively; P = .012). CONCLUSION: Although concomitantly administered strong CYP3A4 inhibitors increased midostaurin exposure 1.44-fold, no clinically relevant differences in safety were noted. Midostaurin dose adjustment is not necessary with concomitant strong CYP3A4 inhibitors in patients with FLT3-mutated AML; however, caution is advised, and patients should be closely monitored.
Authors: Jason Gotlib; Hanneke C Kluin-Nelemans; Tracy I George; Cem Akin; Karl Sotlar; Olivier Hermine; Farrukh T Awan; Elizabeth Hexner; Michael J Mauro; David W Sternberg; Matthieu Villeneuve; Alice Huntsman Labed; Eric J Stanek; Karin Hartmann; Hans-Peter Horny; Peter Valent; Andreas Reiter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D Fabbro; S Ruetz; S Bodis; M Pruschy; K Csermak; A Man; P Campochiaro; J Wood; T O'Reilly; T Meyer Journal: Anticancer Drug Des Date: 2000-02
Authors: Y Furukawa; H A Vu; M Akutsu; T Odgerel; T Izumi; S Tsunoda; Y Matsuo; K Kirito; Y Sato; H Mano; Y Kano Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Richard M Stone; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Ben L Sanford; Kristina Laumann; Susan Geyer; Clara D Bloomfield; Christian Thiede; Thomas W Prior; Konstanze Döhner; Guido Marcucci; Francesco Lo-Coco; Rebecca B Klisovic; Andrew Wei; Jorge Sierra; Miguel A Sanz; Joseph M Brandwein; Theo de Witte; Dietger Niederwieser; Frederick R Appelbaum; Bruno C Medeiros; Martin S Tallman; Jürgen Krauter; Richard F Schlenk; Arnold Ganser; Hubert Serve; Gerhard Ehninger; Sergio Amadori; Richard A Larson; Hartmut Döhner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ellen Weisberg; Christina Boulton; Louise M Kelly; Paul Manley; Doriano Fabbro; Thomas Meyer; D Gary Gilliland; James D Griffin Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: S Fleming; C K Yannakou; G M Haeusler; J Clark; A Grigg; C H Heath; A Bajel; S J van Hal; S C Chen; S T Milliken; C O Morrissey; C S Tam; J Szer; R Weinkove; M A Slavin Journal: Intern Med J Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.048
Authors: Petros Pechlivanoglou; Hoa H Le; Simon Daenen; John A Snowden; Maarten J Postma Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Jannik Stemler; Philipp Koehler; Christian Maurer; Carsten Müller; Oliver A Cornely Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 3.673