Literature DB >> 3575008

Evaluation of routine lumbar punctures in newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome.

M Eldadah, L D Frenkel, I M Hiatt, T Hegyi.   

Abstract

Infants with respiratory distress syndrome are routinely evaluated for infection which commonly includes a lumbar puncture. In this study cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination failed to elicit evidence for meningitis in 238 consecutively admitted infants with respiratory distress syndrome evaluated during the first 24 hours of life. Blood cultures were obtained in all; suprapubic or catheterized urine was obtained in 163 infants; CSF was collected successfully in 203 infants. Seventeen infants demonstrated positive blood cultures: 7 Streptococcus, 5 Staphylococcus, 3 Haemophilus influenzae, 1 Bacillus subtilis and 1 diphtheroid infection. CSF obtained from 14 of those infants had normal examinations and sterile cultures. Factors associated with bacteremia were birth weight (P less than 0.01), gestational age (P less than 0.01), prolonged rupture of membranes (P less than 0.05) and leukopenia below 10 000/mm3 (P less than 0.05). In view of the negative CSF examinations in infants with positive blood cultures and the potential complications of lumbar puncture (hypoxia, trauma, infection, epidermoid tumor), the potential risks of CSF evaluation may exceed the assessed benefit for the infant with respiratory distress syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3575008     DOI: 10.1097/00006454-198703000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  8 in total

1.  Routine lumbar punctures in the newborn--are they justified?

Authors:  P MacMahon; L Jewes; J de Louvois
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  When to do a lumbar puncture in a neonate.

Authors:  H L Halliday
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Is lumbar puncture necessary for evaluation of early neonatal sepsis?

Authors:  B Ray; J Mangalore; C Harikumar; A Tuladhar
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Early-onset neonatal sepsis.

Authors:  Kari A Simonsen; Ann L Anderson-Berry; Shirley F Delair; H Dele Davies
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Bacterial meningitis in infants.

Authors:  Lawrence C Ku; Kim A Boggess; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Management of term infants at increased risk for early-onset bacterial sepsis.

Authors:  Ann L Jefferies
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Towards accurate exclusion of neonatal bacterial meningitis: a feasibility study of a novel 16S rDNA PCR assay.

Authors:  Arthur Abelian; Thomas Mund; Martin D Curran; Stuart A Savill; Nipa Mitra; Carol Charan; Amanda L Ogilvy-Stuart; Hugh R B Pelham; Paul H Dear
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Variation in lumbar punctures for early onset neonatal sepsis: a nationally representative serial cross-sectional analysis, 2003-2009.

Authors:  Stephen W Patrick; Robert E Schumacher; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.125

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.