| Literature DB >> 35749761 |
Sebastian Ludyga1, Toru Ishihara2, Keita Kamijo3.
Abstract
Specific nervous system functions and the regulating roles of oxytocin have evolved because of the necessity to negotiate increasingly complex social systems. We hypothesize that acute and long-term physical activity and exercise have the potential to benefit social cognitive abilities, such as emotion recognition and regulation, by operating on these functions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35749761 PMCID: PMC9470049 DOI: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exerc Sport Sci Rev ISSN: 0091-6331 Impact factor: 6.642
Figure 1Proposed pathways by which physical activity and exercise promote social cognition. Acute and regular engagement in these interventions may promote social cognition by a facilitation of both shared and distinct pathways to social cognition. Whereas both paradigms seem to promote central nervous system functions, different effects are suggested for the neuropeptide oxytocin and the autonomous nervous system function. Notes: Based on the current evidence, the squares indicate which physical activity and exercise paradigm has been associated with the mechanism and outcome.
Figure 2Main regions and networks that contribute to social cognition based on the Social Brain Network Model and the Hierarchical Model of Social Cognition, as well as overlapping regions with the Executive Function (EF) Network. Notes: The regions highlighted in both models are main contributors to the networks and clusters based on the original description of the models (23,24), meaning that not necessarily all contributing regions (or parts of regions) are shown. The regions highlighted in EF Network are those that overlap between the Hierarchical Model of Social Cognition and the EF Network (25). Brain images were created with the Scalable Brain Atlas (available from https://scalablebrainatlas.incf.org).
Overview of studies investigating the association of physical activity, exercise and fitness, and social cognition (emotion recognition and regulation)
| Author, Year | Sample | Design | Exposure or Focus | Cognitive Task | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alarcon-Jimenez | Cross-sectional | Accelerometer-based physical activity through 7 d | Reading the Mind Through the Eyes Test (36 trials) | Association: | |
| Cliff | Cross-sectional | Accelerometer-based physical activity through 24 h | Children-appropriate Theory of Mind task (5 trials); Test of Emotion Comprehension (23 trials) | Difference: | |
| Ishihara | Cross-sectional | Physical fitness (submaximal endurance, gait speed, dexterity, muscular strength) | Animacy perception (10 trials) & emotion recognition from faces (40 trials) | Association: | |
| Lott & Jensen, 2017 ( | Cross-sectional | Maximal exercise test (shuttle run) | Parent reporting on Emotion Regulation Checklist | Association: | |
| Ludyga | Cross-sectional | Submaximal exercise test (ergometer cycling) | Emotion recognition (labeling/ matching) from faces/ eyes (practice +160 trials) | Association: | |
| Ludyga | Cross-sectional | 7-d physical activity recall | Emotion recognition (labeling/ matching) from faces/ eyes (practice +80 trials) | Association: | |
| Zhang | Experimental (2 groups) | I: 40-min jogging at moderate intensity and 60-min yoga (alternating) 3 times per wk through 8 wk | Emotion regulation in response to affective pictures (40 trials) | Pre vs post: |
For outcomes, the direction of effects or associations are indicated by (−), decrease or inverse association; (0), no change or association; and (+), increase or positive association.
C, control group or condition; eV˙O2max, estimated maximal oxygen consumption; I, intervention group or condition; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; PABaseline, baseline physical activity levels; VPA, vigorous physical activity; ERC, Emotion Regulation Checklist.
Overview of studies investigating the effects of acute physical activity and exercise on social cognition (emotion recognition and regulation)
| Author, Year | Sample | Design | Exposure | Cognitive Task | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aguirre-Loaiza | Between-participants design (2 groups) | I: 45-min ergometer cycling at 75%–85% eHRmax | Emotion recognition from body and face (80 trials) | Pre vs post: | |
| Aguirre-Loaiza | Between-participants design (2 groups) | I: 30-min ergometer cycling at 75%–85% eHRmax | Emotion recognition from body and face (80 trials) | Pre vs post: | |
| Bernstein | Between-participants design (2 groups) | I: 30-min jogging at moderate intensity | Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale after negative mood induction (video) | Pre vs post: | |
| Brand | Between-participants design (3 groups) | I1: 35-min aerobic exercise (relay games) at moderate intensity | Emotion recognition (labeling/ matching) from faces/ eyes (practice +80 trials) | Pre vs post: | |
| Edwards | Between-participants design (3 groups) | I1: 15-min walking at light intensity | Affective Circumplex Scale after negative mood induction (video) | Pre vs post: | |
| Giles | Within-participants design (2 conditions) | I1: 90-min walking at light intensity | Cognitive reappraisal in response to affective pictures (72 trials) | Post: |
For outcomes, the direction of effects are indicated by (−), decrease; (0), no change; and (+), increase.
C, control group or condition; eHRmax, estimated maximal heart rate; I, intervention group or condition; PABaseline, baseline physical activity levels.