| Literature DB >> 35749397 |
Maryam A Amour1, Christiaan A Rees2,3, Patricia J Munseri1, Jamila Said1, Albert K Magohe1, Mecky Matee1, Elizabeth A Talbot2, Robert D Arbeit4, Kisali Pallangyo1, C Fordham von Reyn2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prospective studies of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) on healthy subjects in tuberculosis-endemic regions have not examined the long-term variability of serial assays. This issue is relevant to the interpretation of tuberculosis (TB) vaccine trials based on prevention of infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35749397 PMCID: PMC9231806 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Interpretation of T-SPOT TB results based on spot-forming cells (SFCs).
| Interpretation | Nil | ESAT-6 or CFP-10 minus Nil | PHA |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Negative Control) | (Positive Control) | ||
| Positive | ≤ 10 spots | > 7 spots | Any number |
| Borderline | ≤ 10 spots | 5 to 7 spots | Any number |
| Negative | ≤ 10 spots | < 5 spots | ≥ 20 spots |
| Invalid | ≤ 10 spots | < 5 spots | < 20 spots |
| > 10 spots | Any number | Any number |
ESAT-6: TB early secreted antigen-6; CFP-10: TB culture filtrate protein-10; PHA: phytohemagglutinin. Values represent counts of Spot-forming Cells (SFCs).
Concordance between results obtained by quantitative IGRA and manual IGRA.
| N | Quantitative IGRA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Borderline | Negative | Invalid | |||
| (N = 254) | (N = 59) | (N = 3025) | (N = 49) | |||
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Manual IGRA | Positive |
| ||||
| Borderline |
| |||||
| Negative |
| |||||
| Invalid |
| |||||
mIGRA: Manual IGRA interpretation; qIGRA: Quantitative IGRA interpretation using an automated plate reader. A total of 3,387 assays were analyzed by both methods. Light grey cells correspond to concordance between qIGRA and mIGRA results.
Baseline characteristics of study participants.
| Prevalent IGRA Positives (n = 143) | Incident IGRA Converters (n = 45) | Persistent IGRA Negatives (n = 579) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Age | 14·3 [0·75] | 13·9 [0·78] | 14·2 [0·75] | 0·23 |
| Sex (n (%)) | 0·28 | |||
| Male | 69 (48·3) | 16 (35·6) | 248 (42·8) | |
| Female | 74 (51·7) | 29 (64·4) | 331 (57·2) | |
| BMI | 19·1 | 18·5 | 19·3 | 0·52 |
| (Median [Range]) | [13·8–34·9] | [12·9–33·1] | [13·3–35·4] | |
| Hemoglobin | 12·7 | 11·9 | 12·6 | <0·001 |
| (Median [Range]) | [8·7–17·1] | [10·0–20·9] | [8·6–23·5] | |
| WBC count | 6·0 | 5·4 | 5·8 | 0·54 |
| (Median [Range]) | [3·3–12·0] | [2·6–9·7] | [2·8–16·5] | |
| Platelet count | 304 | 312 | 300 | 0·75 |
| (Median [Range]) | [125–672] | [115–719] | [88–1914] | |
| District (n (%)) | 0·73 | |||
| Temeke | 101 (70·6) | 35 (77·8) | 428 (73·9) | |
| Ilala | 5 (3·5) | 1 (2·2) | 24 (4·2) | |
| Kigamboni | 4 (2·8) | 1 (2·2) | 25 (4·4) | |
| Ubungo | 33 (23·1) | 8 (17·8) | 102 (17·6) | |
| Baseline qIGRA SFCs | ||||
| (Median [Range]) | ||||
| Nil | 0 [0–6] | 0 [0–4] | 0 [0–6] | 0·27 |
| ESAT-6 | 24 [0–322] | 0 [0–7] | 0 [0–4] | <0·001 |
| CFP-10 | 28 [0–438] | 0 [0–5] | 0 [0–7] | <0·001 |
| PHA | 228 [21–521] | 203 [22–530] | 206 [20–586] | 0·21 |
p-values reflect the comparison across all three groups.
*,†, and ǂ all indicate pairwise comparisons with p-values <0.05.
[a] ANOVA
[b] Chi-squared test
[c] Kruskal-Wallis test
Characteristics of IGRA converters based on timing of initial positivity.
| (N = 45) | Early Converters | Late Converters | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 15) | (n = 30) | ||
| Age in Years | 15 [13–15] | 14 [13–15] | |
| (Median [Range]) | |||
| Baseline qIGRA SFCs | |||
| (Median [Range]) | |||
| Nil | 0 [0–3] | 0 [0–4] | 0·43 |
| ESAT-6 | 0 [0–5] | 0 [0–7] | 0·41 |
| CFP-10 | 1 [0–4] | 0 [0–5] | 0·08 |
| PHA | 195 [40–530] | 204 [22–527] | 1·00 |
| Incident qIGRA SFCs | |||
| (Median [Range]) | |||
| Nil | 0 [0–5] | 0 [0–2] | 0·15 |
| ESAT-6 | 12 [2–133] | 14 [1–277] | 0·65 |
| CFP-10 | 10 [0–405] | 20 [0–224] | 0·15 |
| PHA | 330 [75–542] | 397 [112–1000] | 0·12 |
Analysis of Nil, ESAT-6, and CFP-10 was done using the Mann-Whitney U-test; analysis of PHA was done using the Student’s t-test. Early converters: initial positive at month two. Late converters: initial positive at one to three years.
IGRA results at baseline and at time of first positive IGRA for subgroups of converters.
| Transient Converters | Persistent Converters | Irregular Converters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 16) | (n = 12) | (n = 15) | ||
| Baseline qIGRA SFCs | ||||
| (Median [Range]) | ||||
| Nil | 0 [0–3] | 0 [0–2] | 0 [0–4] | 0·61 |
| ESAT-6 | 0 [0–5] | 0 [0–2] | 1 [0–7] | 0·10 |
| CFP-10 | 0 [0–4] | 0.5 [0–4] | 1 [0–5] | 0·06 |
| PHA | 198 [30–496] | 220 [32–527] | 195 [22–530] | 0·92 |
| Incident qIGRA SFCs | ||||
| (Median [Range]) | ||||
| Nil | 0 [0–2] | 0 [0–5] | 0 [0–3] | 0·69 |
| ESAT-6 | 11.5 [2–277] | 40 [4–133] | 12 [2–48] | 0·17 |
| CFP-10 | 10 [0–224] | 25 [6–405] | 12 [0–58] | 0·09 |
| PHA | 323 [81–578] | 385 [118–1000] | 330 [75–634] | 0·70 |
Converter subcategories are based on the pattern of IGRA results obtained after the initial positive result: Transient converters were subsequently consistently IGRA-negative; persistent converters were consistently IGRA-positive; irregular converters had ≥2 different assay results after conversion.
Results in the p-value column represent analyses across all three groups using Kruskal-Wallis test, except for the baseline PHA analysis, which was done by ANOVA. Comparison of transient vs persistent converter subgroups was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, except for the baseline PHA analysis, which was done by Student’s t-test, with results shown by symbol
ǂp = 0.25
*p = 0.06. See text regarding potential effect of vaccine on ESAT-6.
Distribution of 3 IGRA conversion categories based on number of IGRAs performed after initial conversion.
| N of IGRAs after initial conversion | Transient Converters (n = 16) | Persistent Converters (n = 12) | Irregular Converters (n = 15) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| 2 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 15 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Total | 16 | 12 | 15 | 43 |
Excludes two initial converters with no repeat IGRA assays.
P = 0.004 for distribution by Chi-squared analysis.
Results of serial IGRAs performed among 15 subjects who met criteria for irregular converters.
| Subject | Visit | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 2 Months | A | B | 1 Year | C | 2 Years | D | 36 | E | |
| 1 | N | N | - | - | P | P | P | - | B | - |
| 2 | N | N | - | - | N | - | P | P | P | N |
| 3 | N | P | N | B | N | - | N | - | N | - |
| 4 | N | P | N | N | N | - | P | N | - | - |
| 5 | N | P | N | N | B | - | - | - | - | - |
| 6 | N | P | N | - | B | - | N | - | P | N |
| 7 | N | N | - | - | N | - | P | N | P | - |
| 8 | N | N | - | - | N | - | P | P | N | - |
| 9 | N | P | N | - | N | - | P | N | - | - |
| 10 | N | P | - | - | B | - | N | - | N | - |
| 11 | N | N | - | - | P | - | P | P | N | - |
| 12 | N | P | P | N | N | - | N | - | B | N |
| 13 | N | P | N | B | P | - | B | - | - | N |
| 14 | N | - | - | - | P | - | B | - | P | - |
| 15 | N | P | P | N | N | - | P | N | N | - |
Irregular converters were defined as subjects who converted from IGRA-negative to IGRA positive then had ≥2 subsequent shifts in IGRA category. Per-protocol visits were scheduled at baseline, 2 mos and 1, 2 and 3 years. Additional visits between these times are labelled A, B, C, D and E.
B = Borderline
N = Negative
P = Positive