C Mínguez Ojeda1, V Gómez Dos Santos1, J Álvaro Lorca1, I Ruz-Caracuel2, H Pian2, A Sanjuanbenito Dehesa3, F J Burgos Revilla1, M Araujo-Castro4. 1. Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain. 2. Pathology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain. 3. General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain. 4. Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Colmenar Viejo Street, km. 9, 100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. marta.araujo@salud.madrid.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relevance of tumour size in adrenal tumours in the estimation of malignancy risk and in the outcomes of adrenalectomy. METHODS: We evaluate the histological results and surgical outcomes (intraoperative and postsurgical complications) in a retrospective single-centre cohort of patients without history of active extraadrenal malignancy with adrenal tumours consecutively operated in our centre during January 2010 and December 2020. We compared these results in lesions smaller and larger than 40, 50, and 60 mm. RESULTS: Of 131 patients with adrenal tumours who underwent adrenalectomy, 76 (58.0%) had adrenal masses measuring ≥ 40 mm; 47 were > 50 mm and 28 > 60 mm. The final diagnosis was adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) in 7 patients, pheochromocytoma in 35, and benign lesions in the remaining. All patients with ACC had adrenal masses > 50 mm, with Hounsfield units > 40 and low lipidic content in the CT. The risk of ACC and pheochromocytoma increased as tumour size did. The diagnostic accuracy of tumour size was quite good for the prediction of ACC (AUC-ROC 0.883). Nevertheless, when only adrenal tumours with HU < 40 were considered, the risk of ACC was 0% independent of tumour size. For pheochromocytomas, the risk was of 8.6% independent of tumour size for lesions with < 20HU. The risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications was independent of tumour size. CONCLUSION: Risk of malignancy and of pheochromocytoma increased as tumour size increased, but, in the presurgical estimation of malignancy risk and of pheochromocytoma, not only tumour size, also lipidic content and other radiological features, should be considered. The risk of complications was independent of tumour size, but hospital stay was longer in patients with complication or open approach.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relevance of tumour size in adrenal tumours in the estimation of malignancy risk and in the outcomes of adrenalectomy. METHODS: We evaluate the histological results and surgical outcomes (intraoperative and postsurgical complications) in a retrospective single-centre cohort of patients without history of active extraadrenal malignancy with adrenal tumours consecutively operated in our centre during January 2010 and December 2020. We compared these results in lesions smaller and larger than 40, 50, and 60 mm. RESULTS: Of 131 patients with adrenal tumours who underwent adrenalectomy, 76 (58.0%) had adrenal masses measuring ≥ 40 mm; 47 were > 50 mm and 28 > 60 mm. The final diagnosis was adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) in 7 patients, pheochromocytoma in 35, and benign lesions in the remaining. All patients with ACC had adrenal masses > 50 mm, with Hounsfield units > 40 and low lipidic content in the CT. The risk of ACC and pheochromocytoma increased as tumour size did. The diagnostic accuracy of tumour size was quite good for the prediction of ACC (AUC-ROC 0.883). Nevertheless, when only adrenal tumours with HU < 40 were considered, the risk of ACC was 0% independent of tumour size. For pheochromocytomas, the risk was of 8.6% independent of tumour size for lesions with < 20HU. The risk of intraoperative and postoperative complications was independent of tumour size. CONCLUSION: Risk of malignancy and of pheochromocytoma increased as tumour size increased, but, in the presurgical estimation of malignancy risk and of pheochromocytoma, not only tumour size, also lipidic content and other radiological features, should be considered. The risk of complications was independent of tumour size, but hospital stay was longer in patients with complication or open approach.
Authors: Lynnette K Nieman; Beverly M K Biller; James W Findling; John Newell-Price; Martin O Savage; Paul M Stewart; Victor M Montori Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Nigel Field; Ted Cohen; Marc J Struelens; Daniel Palm; Barry Cookson; Judith R Glynn; Valentina Gallo; Mary Ramsay; Pam Sonnenberg; Duncan Maccannell; Andre Charlett; Matthias Egger; Jonathan Green; Paolo Vineis; Ibrahim Abubakar Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Andrea Frilling; Karsten Tecklenborg; Frank Weber; Hilmar Kühl; Stephan Müller; Georgios Stamatis; Christoph Broelsch Journal: Surgery Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: F Mantero; M Terzolo; G Arnaldi; G Osella; A M Masini; A Alì; M Giovagnetti; G Opocher; A Angeli Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: John W Funder; Robert M Carey; Franco Mantero; M Hassan Murad; Martin Reincke; Hirotaka Shibata; Michael Stowasser; William F Young Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jacques W M Lenders; Quan-Yang Duh; Graeme Eisenhofer; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Stefan K G Grebe; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Mitsuhide Naruse; Karel Pacak; William F Young Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.958