Literature DB >> 35748955

Validation of a scoring system to predict bladder dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Kwan Ho Lee1, Chungki Min1, Hyung Ook Kim2, Yong Bog Kim1,3, Yongjun Park1, Jung Tak Son1, Sung Ryol Lee1, Kyung Uk Jung1, Hungdai Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A recent trend in  urinary catheter management in patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is early removal. However, some patients develop bladder dysfunction and require urinary re-catheterization. In 2016, a scoring system to predict bladder dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery was developed in our institution. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the validity of this scoring system and to determine the suitability of patients for early removal of urinary catheter.
METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study from a prospective database was conducted on 234 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2019. According to bladder dysfunction predictive score, the urinary catheter was removed on the first postoperative day (low-risk group) and fifth postoperative day (high-risk group). After catheter removal, all patients were managed using in-house protocols.
RESULTS: Of 234 patients, 130 (55.6%) were classified as a low-risk group. The overall incidence of bladder dysfunction was 8.5% (11/130) in the low-risk group and 13.5% (14/104) in the high-risk group.
CONCLUSION: The scoring system developed to predict bladder dysfunction showed good overall performance for discriminating between patients suitable or not for early removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Rectal neoplasms; Rectal surgery; Urinary catheterization

Year:  2022        PMID: 35748955     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02582-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  18 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Douglas W Wilmore
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons.

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Liane S Feldman; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Early Urinary Catheter Removal Following Pelvic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Devin N Patel; Seth I Felder; Michael Luu; Timothy J Daskivich; Karen N Zaghiyan; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Long-term outcomes of urethral catheterisation injuries: a prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  N F Davis; N R Bhatt; E MacCraith; H D Flood; R Mooney; G Leonard; M T Walsh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Male sex and anterior wall tumor location as risk factors for urinary dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Authors:  Hiroki Hamamoto; Masashi Yamamoto; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Masatsugu Ishii; Wataru Osumi; Keitaro Tanaka; Junji Okuda; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Voiding and sexual dysfunction after deep rectal resection and total mesorectal excision: prospective study on 52 patients.

Authors:  Peter Sterk; Bijan Shekarriz; Svetlana Günter; Jan Nolde; Robert Keller; Hans-Peter Bruch; Hodjat Shekarriz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery--is it necessary for that long?

Authors:  Oded Zmora; Khaled Madbouly; Hagit Tulchinsky; Ahmed Hussein; Marat Khaikin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Retrospective risk analysis for acute urinary dysfunction after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in patients receiving epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Masatsugu Hiraki; Toshiya Tanaka; Eiji Sadashima; Hirofumi Sato; Kenji Kitahara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Outcomes of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter Following Rectal Resection for Cancer.

Authors:  E Duchalais; David W Larson; N Machairas; K L Mathis; E J Dozois; S R Kelley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Scoring Systems Used to Predict Bladder Dysfunction After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Hyung Ook Kim; Young Sam Cho; Hungdai Kim; Sung Ryol Lee; Kyung Uk Jung; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.