| Literature DB >> 35747760 |
Hongmei Dai1, Fangting Liu2, Jianshu Lu3, Yan Yang4, Pingping Liu2.
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a hormonal disorder that affects 5-20% of women of reproductive age. Interestingly, serum miR-124-3p and ANGPTL2 are differentially expressed in PCOS patients. Accordingly, this study set out to explore the clinical roles of serum miR-124-3p/ANGPTL2 in PCOS. Firstly, miR-124-3p/ANGPTL2 expression patterns were detected in the serum of 102 PCOS patients and 100 healthy subjects. miR-124-3p or/and ANGPTL2 diagnostic efficacy on PCOS was further analyzed, in addition to the measurement of lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism, sex hormone indexes, and inflammation levels. Correlations between serum miR-124-3p/ANGPTL2 expressions and age, BMI, Ferriman-Gallwey score, lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism, sex hormone indexes, TNF-α, and IL-6 in PCOS patients were determined. The expression correlation and binding relationship of ANGPTL2 and miR-124-3p were identified. In addition, miR-124-3p was downregulated and ANGPTL2 was upregulated in the serum of obese and nonobese PCOS patients. miR-124-3p expression was found to be negatively correlated with Ferriman-Gallwey score and serum total testosterone (T), and negatively related to prolactin (PRL). ANGPTL2 expression was positively correlated with FNS and inversely linked with PRL. TNF-α and IL-6 were negatively correlated with miR-124-3p, but positively correlated with ANGPTL2. Furthermore, there was a negative correlation and a targeting relationship between ANGPTL2 and miR-124-3p expression in the serum of obese and nonobese PCOS patients. Collectively, our findings indicated that miR-124-3p might target ANGPTL2 expression in obese and nonobese PCOS patients, and further underscored the diagnostic value of their combination.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35747760 PMCID: PMC9213205 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2155018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 2.803
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Forward 5′-3′ | Reverse 5′-3′ |
|---|---|---|
| miR-124-3p | TCTTTAAGGCACGCGGTG | TATGGTTTTGACGACTGTGTGAT |
| ANGPTL2 | GAACCGAGTGCATAAGCAGGA | GTGACCCGCGAGTTCATGTT |
| GAPDH | GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT | GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG |
| U6 | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT |
Comparison of clinical baseline data between obese and nonobese PCOS patients and healthy subjects.
| Feature | Control-obese | PCOS-obese | Control-nonobese | PCOS-nonobese |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ||||
| General comparison | |||||||
| Age (year) | 26 ± 3.6 | 26 ± 3.8 | 26 ± 3.5 | 26 ± 3.7 | >0.9999 | >0.9999 | >0.9999 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.46 ± 0.94 | 30.02 ± 1.66 | 21.03 ± 1.45 | 23.07 ± 1.40 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Ferriman–Gallwey score | 4.87 ± 1.74 | 7.79 ± 2.52 | 4.13 ± 1.67 | 5.92 ± 1.29 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Lipid metabolism index | |||||||
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.52 ± 0.86 | 4.86 ± 0.88 | 4.48 ± 0.63 | 4.63 ± 0.72 | 0.2198 | 0.6735 | 0.4269 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.28 ± 0.24 | 1.33 ± 0.28 | 1.22 ± 0.21 | 1.29 ± 0.25 | 0.8159 | 0.3643 | 0.845 |
| Glucose metabolism index | |||||||
| HOMA-IR | 2.47 ± 0.39 | 2.87 ± 0.66 | 2.39 ± 0.35 | 2.83 ± 0.65 | 0.0083 | <0.0001 | 0.982 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.13 ± 0.82 | 5.52 ± 0.94 | 4.82 ± 0.78 | 5.09 ± 0.84 | 0.2031 | 0.2734 | 0.058 |
| FINS (mU/L) | 10.86 ± 1.84 | 12.48 ± 2.03 | 9.96 ± 1.64 | 11.36 ± 2.01 | 0.0016 | 0.0002 | 0.0171 |
| Sex hormone levels | |||||||
| T (ng/mL) | 0.46 ± 0.12 | 0.63 ± 0.24 | 0.41 ± 0.12 | 0.53 ± 0.16 | <0.0001 | 0.0003 | 0.0141 |
| E2 (pg/mL) | 48.34 ± 8.62 | 52.32 ± 9.03 | 48.26 ± 8.26 | 50.26 ± 8.86 | 0.2074 | 0.5616 | 0.6387 |
| PRL (ng/mL) | 11.86 ± 2.42 | 11.16 ± 1.16 | 11.68 ± 1.26 | 11.38 ± 1.08 | 0.1672 | 0.6438 | 0.8731 |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 6.46 ± 1.62 | 7.62 ± 2.61 | 5.84 ± 1.58 | 6.68 ± 2.48 | 0.0946 | 0.1172 | 0.126 |
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 6.35 ± 1.28 | 5.52 ± 1.12 | 6.64 ± 1.29 | 5.59 ± 1.12 | 0.0194 | 0.0067 | 0.31 |
| LH/FSH | 1.12 ± 0.38 | 1.28 ± 0.31 | 0.88 ± 0.13 | 1.08 ± 0.23 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Inflammatory factor levels | |||||||
| TNF- | 49.36 ± 4.26 | 64.68 ± 10.42 | 46.32 ± 4.03 | 57.28 ± 9.64 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 45.62 ± 5.86 | 72.36 ± 12.64 | 38.69 ± 5.26 | 59.84 ± 11.08 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Note. Pa, PCOS-obese group versus control-obese group; Pb, PCOS-nonobese group versus control-nonobese group; Pc, PCOS-obese group versus PCOS-nonobese group. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. BMI = body mass index; TC = total cholesterol; TG = total triglyceride; HOMA-IR = HOMA insulin resistance; FBG = fasting blood glucose; FINS = fasting insulin; T = total testosterone; E2 = estradiol; PRL = prolactin; LH = luteinizing hormone; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone.
Figure 1Expression patterns of miR-124-3p and ANGPTL2 in the serum of obese and nonobese PCOS patients and their clinical diagnostic efficacy. (a, b) Expression patterns of miR-124-3p and ANGPTL2 in serum of obese and nonobese PCOS patients (N = 102) and healthy subjects (control, N = 100) were detected by RT-qPCR. (c) Expression patterns of ANGPTL2 in the serum of obese/nonobese PCOS patients (N = 42/60) and healthy obese/nonobese subjects (N = 32/68) were detected by ELISA. (d, e) ROC curve was adopted to analyze serum miR-124-3p or/and ANGPTL2 in the diagnosis of obese and nonobese PCOS. Data among multiple groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. P < 0.01.
Relationship between the expression of miR-124-3p in serum and the clinicopathological features of obese and nonobese PCOS patients.
| Parameters | PCOS-obese ( | PCOS-nonobese ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson |
| Pearson |
| |
| General comparison | ||||
| Age | −0.084 | 0.597 | −0.0292 | 0.8248 |
| BMI | 0.0525 | 0.7411 | 0.0861 | 0.513 |
| Ferriman–Gallwey score | −0.3935 | 0.0099 | −0.4104 | 0.0011 |
| Lipid metabolism index | ||||
| TC | −0.0758 | 0.6333 | −0.0312 | 0.8129 |
| TG | −0.0768 | 0.6288 | −0.0308 | 0.8155 |
| Glucose metabolism index | ||||
| HOMA-IR | −0.267 | 0.0874 | −0.148 | 0.259 |
| FBG | −0.0769 | 0.6285 | 0.0322 | 0.8072 |
| FINS | −0.3633 | 0.018 | −0.2541 | 0.0501 |
| Sex hormone levels | ||||
| T | −0.4586 | 0.0023 | −0.3685 | 0.0038 |
| E2 | −0.0753 | 0.6354 | −0.03 | 0.8202 |
| PRL | 0.6254 | <0.0001 | 0.6664 | <0.0001 |
| LH | −0.0755 | 0.6346 | −0.0299 | 0.8204 |
| FSH | 0.2612 | 0.0947 | 0.0421 | 0.7492 |
| LH/FSH | −0.2115 | 0.1787 | 0.0045 | 0.9729 |
Note. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the data. BMI = body mass index; TC = total cholesterol; TG = total triglyceride; HOMA-IR = HOMA insulin resistance; FBG = fasting blood glucose; FINS = fasting insulin; T = testosterone; E2 = estradiol; PRL = prolactin; LH = luteinizing hormone; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone.
Relationship between the expression of ANGPTL2 in serum and the clinicopathological features of obese and nonobese PCOS patients.
| Parameters | PCOS-obese ( | PCOS-nonobese ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson |
| Pearson |
| |
| General comparison | ||||
| Age | 0.0841 | 0.5966 | 0.0002 | 0.9985 |
| BMI | 0.0064 | 0.968 | 0.045 | 0.7333 |
| Ferriman–Gallwey score | 0.2012 | 0.2014 | 0.2853 | 0.0271 |
| Lipid metabolism index | ||||
| TC | 0.0787 | 0.6205 | −0.0101 | 0.939 |
| TG | 0.0792 | 0.6181 | −0.0094 | 0.9429 |
| Glucose metabolism index | ||||
| HOMA-IR | 0.2072 | 0.1879 | 0.0282 | 0.8307 |
| FBG | 0.0795 | 0.6168 | −0.0728 | 0.5804 |
| FINS | 0.38 | 0.013 | 0.2734 | 0.0345 |
| Sex hormone levels | ||||
| T | 0.4227 | 0.0053 | 0.2186 | 0.0934 |
| E2 | 0.0784 | 0.6218 | −0.0108 | 0.935 |
| PRL | −0.3808 | 0.0129 | −0.4387 | 0.0005 |
| FSH | −0.3625 | 0.0183 | −0.161 | 0.219 |
| LH | 0.0785 | 0.6212 | −0.011 | 0.9335 |
| LH/FSH | 0.2569 | 0.1005 | 0.0171 | 0.8967 |
Note. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the data. BMI = body mass index; TC = total cholesterol; TG = total triglyceride; HOMA-IR = HOMA insulin resistance; FBG = fasting blood glucose; FINS = fasting insulin; T = total testosterone; E2 = estradiol; PRL = prolactin; LH = luteinizing hormone; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone.
Figure 2Correlation between serum miR-124-3p and ANGPTL2 with inflammatory factors in PCOS patients. (a–d) Correlation between serum miR-124-3p or ANGPTL2 level and TNF-α or IL-6 in PCOS patients. The correlation of data was carried out using Pearson correlation analysis.
Figure 3miR-124-3p targeted ANGPTL2. (a, b) The relationship between miR-124-3p and ANGPTL2 mRNA level in obese and nonobese PCOS patients. (c) The binding sites between miR-124-3p and ANGPTL2 predicted using the StarBase database. (d) The binding relationship of miR-124-3p and ANGPTL2 was detected with a dual-luciferase assay. Pearson correlation analysis was used in panels A/B, and the nonpaired t-test was used in panel D. P < 0.001.