| Literature DB >> 35747376 |
Xiaoqin Zhang1, Yu Wu1.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical study of acupoint massage combined with recombinant bovine basic fibroblast growth factor (rbFGF) ophthalmic gel combined with limbal stem cell transplantation on visual quality, corneal refraction, and aesthetic outcome in patients with pterygium.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35747376 PMCID: PMC9213128 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7103496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of clinical efficacy (n (%)).
| Groups | Cured | Effective | Recurrence | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 8 (26.67) | 13 (43.33) | 9 (30.00) | 21 (70.00) |
| Study group ( | 20 (66.67) | 8 (26.67) | 2 (6.67) | 28 (93.33) |
|
| 5.46 | |||
|
| 0.02 |
Improvement of visual quality parameter ( ± s).
| Groups | SR | TF-OSI | MTF cutoff | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| Control group ( | 0.07 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.06 | 1.53 ± 0.14 | 0.65 ± 0.28 | 9.31 ± 1.25 | 19.58 ± 1.28 |
| Study group ( | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 1.52 ± 0.13 | 0.50 ± 0.23 | 9.30 ± 1.26 | 20.47 ± 1.68 |
|
| 0.97 | 3.79 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 2.31 |
|
| 0.33 | <0.001 | 0.77 | 0.02 | 0.98 | 0.02 |
Comparison of corneal refractive status ( ± s).
| Groups | CAD | CHC | CVC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| Control group ( | 1.61 ± 0.14 | 0.58 ± 0.18 | 39.01 ± 5.24 | 45.24 ± 5.25 | 40.20 ± 4.35 | 43.19 ± 4.19 |
| Study group ( | 1.60 ± 0.16 | 0.47 ± 0.13 | 40.02 ± 5.16 | 47.82 ± 4.10 | 40.17 ± 4.23 | 47.24 ± 4.30 |
|
| 0.26 | 2.71 | 0.75 | 2.12 | 0.02 | 3.69 |
|
| 0.79 | <0.001 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 0.97 | <0.001 |
CAD, corneal astigmatism degree; CHC, corneal horizontal curvature; CVC, corneal vertical curvature.
Comparative analysis of changes in tear film function ( ± s).
| Groups | BUT (s) | SIT (mm/5 min) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | |
| Control group ( | 9.51 ± 0.24 | 12.15 ± 1.29 | 12.25 ± 0.24 | 13.12 ± 0.14 |
| Study group ( | 9.50 ± 0.22 | 13.93 ± 1.26 | 12.23 ± 0.30 | 13.95 ± 0.32 |
|
| 0.16 | 5.40 | 0.28 | 13.01 |
|
| 0.86 | <0.001 | 0.77 | 0.01 |
Analysis and comparison of cosmetic effects (n (%)).
| Groups | Subvalvular effusion | Opaque graft flap | Congestion in the transplant area | Adverse manifestations rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group ( | 4 (13.34) | 4 (13.34) | 7 (23.32) | 15 (50.00) |
| Study group ( | 2 (6.67) | 1 (3.33) | 1 (3.33) | 4 (13.33) |
|
| 9.32 | |||
|
| <0.001 |