| Literature DB >> 35746565 |
Huimin Yin1, Qingqing You1, Jing Wu2, Lianji Jin3.
Abstract
In the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic, promoting influenza knowledge and vaccine helps reduce the risk of dual pandemics and relieve the pressure on healthcare systems. Due to the low rate of influenza vaccination in China, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to investigate whether a knowledge gap regarding influenza and influenza vaccine exists between Chinese groups of different socioeconomic statuses and then explore the possible factors influencing knowledge level. A total of 951 valid questionnaires were collected online in this study. Variance analysis shows a knowledge gap regarding influenza and influenza vaccination between different socioeconomic status groups. Correlation analysis shows that internet media, social media, public communication, and interpersonal communication are positively associated with the knowledge level. Multilevel regression analysis shows a significant interaction between internet media and educational level. This study finds that internet media use helps narrow the knowledge gap between groups with different education levels. This article recommends a multi-channel promotion of influenza and vaccine knowledge and better pertinence between contents and readers.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; health communication; influenza; influenza vaccination; knowledge gap; vaccine hesitancy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35746565 PMCID: PMC9228307 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10060957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Questions about influenza and influenza vaccine.
| No | Questions |
|---|---|
| 1 | Influenza is seasonal flu, an acute respiratory infection caused by the cold virus. |
| 2 | Unlike the common cold, high fever, headache, fatigue, cough, and general aches are the main symptoms of influenza. |
| 3 | Influenza usually heals itself in 3–14 days without causing severe illness or being life-threatening. |
| 4 | Influenza is highly contagious through droplet and contact transmission. |
| 5 | The whole population is susceptible to influenza. |
| 6 | Pregnant women, infants, the elderly, and people with chronic diseases are at high risk for severe illness and death from influenza. |
| 7 | Daily protective measures such as wearing masks, washing hands frequently, and keeping social distance can effectively reduce the infection and spread of influenza. |
| 8 | Annual influenza vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent influenza. |
| 9 | Drug prophylaxis can replace vaccination. |
| 10 | China has now approved a variety of influenza vaccines for the market. |
| 11 | Influenza vaccination is voluntary and self-funded in most regions of China. |
| 12 | Before the flu season every year, September and October are the best time to vaccinate against influenza. |
| 13 | Children aged from 6 months to 5 years are the key groups to receive the influenza vaccine. |
| 14 | The elderly aged 60 and above are the key groups for influenza vaccination. |
| 15 | Healthy adults should also be vaccinated against influenza. |
The age structure of the study participants (N = 600).
| Age | Age Proportion of the Sixth Census (%) | Frequency ( | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18–29 | 20.32 | 174 | 29 |
| 30–39 | 16.14 | 138 | 23 |
| 40–49 | 17.28 | 144 | 24 |
| 50–59 | 12.02 | 102 | 17 |
| 60–65 | 5.08 | 42 | 7 |
| Total | 70.84 | 600 | 100 |
Results of confirmatory factor analysis.
| Construct | Item | Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information Sources | IS | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.53 | 0.53 |
| Knowledge | KL1 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| KL2 | 0.92 |
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants (N = 600).
| Variables | Category | Frequency ( | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 249 | 41.5% |
| Female | 351 | 58.5% | |
| Age | 18–29 | 174 | 29.0% |
| 30–39 | 138 | 23.0% | |
| 40–49 | 144 | 24.0% | |
| 50–59 | 102 | 17.0% | |
| 60–65 | 42 | 7.0% | |
| Region | Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen | 100 | 16.7% |
| Provincial capitals and municipalities | 175 | 29.2% | |
| prefecture-level city | 161 | 26.8% | |
| County-level city | 87 | 14.5% | |
| Town or village | 69 | 11.5% | |
| other | 8 | 1.3% | |
| Monthly income | <119.0 | 28 | 4.7% |
| 119.0–238.1 | 34 | 5.7% | |
| 238.1–357.1 | 25 | 4.2% | |
| 357.4–476.2 | 45 | 7.5% | |
| 476.4–714.3 | 70 | 11.7% | |
| 714.5–1190.5 | 114 | 19.0% | |
| 1190.7–1904.8 | 120 | 20.0% | |
| 1905.0–2381.0 | 50 | 8.3% | |
| 2381.2–4762.0 | 94 | 15.7% | |
| >4762.0 | 20 | 3.3% | |
| Education | Junior high school and below | 45 | 7.5% |
| High school, specialized secondary schools, skilled workers schools | 86 | 14.3% | |
| Junior college | 94 | 15.7% | |
| Undergraduate | 259 | 43.2% | |
| Master’s degree and above | 116 | 19.3% |
Results of variance analysis.
| Educational Level |
| Mean | SD | Welch F | Sig |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junior high school and below | 45 | 2.72 | 1.02 | 15.66 | 0 |
| High school, specialized secondary schools, skilled workers schools | 86 | 3.10 | 1.11 | ||
| Junior college | 94 | 3.53 | 0.99 | ||
| Undergraduate | 259 | 3.77 | 0.95 | ||
| Master’s degree and above | 116 | 3.76 | 0.89 |
Correlation analysis between the independent and dependent variables.
| Media | Knowledge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional media | 0.042 |
| |||
| internet media | 0.260 ** | 0.387 ** |
| ||
| Mobile social media | 0.236 ** | 0.268 ** | 0.513 ** |
| |
| public communication | 0.191 ** | 0.285 ** | 0.417 ** | 0.397 ** |
|
| Interpersonal communication | 0.201 ** | 0.185 ** | 0.325 ** | 0.366 ** | 0.408 ** |
** p < 0.01.
Results of the multilevel regression analysis (N = 600).
| Model One | Model Two | Model Three | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | t |
| β | B | SE | t |
| β | B | SE | t |
| β | |
| (constant) | 2.61 ** | 0.21 | 12.449 | 0 | 2.529 ** | 0.209 | 12.088 | 0 | 2.147 ** | 0.324 | 6.626 | 0 | |||
| Education | 0.233 ** | 0.034 | 6.81 | 0 | 0.266 | 0.189 ** | 0.034 | 5.555 | 0 | 0.216 | 0.152 ** | 0.036 | 4.202 | 0 | 0.173 |
| Monthly income | 0.07 ** | 0.018 | 3.963 | 0 | 0.158 | 0.06 ** | 0.017 | 3.491 | 0.001 | 0.136 | 0.059 ** | 0.017 | 3.397 | 0.001 | 0.132 |
| Gender | −0.193 * | 0.081 | −2.383 | 0.018 | −0.093 | −0.186 * | 0.079 | −2.345 | 0.019 | −0.089 | −0.182 * | 0.079 | −2.287 | 0.023 | −0.087 |
| Traditional media | −0.052 | 0.028 | −1.897 | 0.058 | −0.078 | −0.055 * | 0.027 | −1.999 | 0.046 | −0.082 | |||||
| internet media | 0.101 ** | 0.032 | 3.153 | 0.002 | 0.148 | 0.248 | 0.149 | 1.663 | 0.097 | 0.365 | |||||
| Mobile social media | 0.044 | 0.031 | 1.418 | 0.157 | 0.065 | 0.043 | 0.031 | 1.364 | 0.173 | 0.062 | |||||
| public communication | 0.029 | 0.024 | 1.223 | 0.222 | 0.054 | 0.036 | 0.024 | 1.475 | 0.141 | 0.065 | |||||
| interpersonal communication | 0.048 | 0.024 | 1.956 | 0.051 | 0.083 | 0.214 | 0.126 | 1.698 | 0.09 | 0.372 | |||||
| Education*Interpersonal | −0.031 | 0.021 | −1.495 | 0.136 | −0.205 | ||||||||||
| Gender*internet | 0.01 | 0.056 | 0.179 | 0.858 | 0.024 | ||||||||||
| Gender*Interpersonal | 0.005 | 0.047 | 0.115 | 0.908 | 0.015 | ||||||||||
| Education*internet | −0.062 * | 0.025 | −2.447 | 0.015 | −0.344 | ||||||||||
| Income*internet | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.897 | 0.37 | 0.105 | ||||||||||
| Income*Interpersonal | −0.009 | 0.01 | −0.948 | 0.343 | −0.109 | ||||||||||
| R2 | 0.128 | 0.186 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.124 | 0.174 | 0.181 | ||||||||||||
| ΔR2 | 0.128 | 0.057 | 0.015 | ||||||||||||
| F | F (3596) = 29.289, | F (8591) = 16.827, | F (14,585) = 10.458, | ||||||||||||
| ΔF | F (3596) = 29.289, | F (5591) = 8.277, | F (6585) = 1.787, | ||||||||||||
Notes: Dependent variable: knowledge, * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1Regression plot for the interaction between media use (internet) and education.